Skip to comments.Stephen Miller: Democratic party set Constitution 'ablaze' this week
Posted on 12/21/2019 5:27:25 AM PST by iontheball
Ms. Regan interviews Miller regarding impeachment, Pelosi's Democrats, and the DNC's lust for power to destroy America. He delivers a warning to viewers that the only man standing in the breach keeping the Socialist/Communists from destroying America is Trump. I would add that it includes the American peoples' steadfast support and fervent prayer.
(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxbusiness.com ...
Impeachment is part of a law to my thinking and the session has ended.
A must see video and Trish is soooo easy on the eyes!
Can I retract my last post?? I think it is based on the two Sessions of the Congress...
Yes, this legislative session ends January 3, 2021.
Which leaves a really bizarre possibility:
1. Trump is re-elected next November.
2. Pelosi finally transmits Articles of Impeachment, and list of House Managers, to Senate.
3. The impossible happens and Senate promptly convicts Trump.
4. Trump leaves office.
5. Pence is promptly inaugurated.
6. Trump is inaugurated January 21, 2021.
Removal from office doesn’t mean he can’t come back.
A bar from holding public office can be part of the sentence imposed by the Senate.
The Democrats don’t care if they destroy the Constitution, the rule of law, or the United States. In fact, that is their objective.
Anyone else wondering why Trump in his pre impeachment tweets did not openly and repeatedly accuse Pelosi and her son Paul of overt corruption. Paul Pelosi did exactly the same thing as Hunter Biden in the Ukraine. He like Hunter Biden was given a job for which he had absolutely no qualifications other than his relation to Nancy Pelosi and received a huge amount of money. If Trump had pointed out this corruption on a regular basis and argued that he had every right and obligation to investigate this corruption, that the impeachment fiasco was meant to blunt that righteous investigation and protect the criminals, then perhaps many more of those Democrats in swing districts would have backed off and the American people would have a better understanding of what was really happening. Most Americans do not know that Paul Pelosi also laundered corrupt funds.
They did that on Usurpation Day, January 20, 2009.
With the complete cooperation of the GOP.
Removal from office doesnt mean he cant come back.
Surprise,surprise, it appears the Democrats are willing to make subtle change as it appears if the Senate were to remove Trump the rats were sure to add the provision he can never hold elected office again. I’ll look it up and see if they authorized a stake be driven tru his heart also.
The Dems are going to have an election that’ll make the UKLabour Party look like a mild loss...
It’s been smoldering ever since 0bama.
Articles of impeachment are different from legislation and nominations in that they survive not only across session, but even across Congresses.
Clinton was impeached (and articles intro’d to the senate) in the 105th, trial began on the 106th. The only thing that did not survive the transition was naming of managers, so a second/new resolution was passed for that.
The Clinton case is not unique in this regard.
For the sake of our Republic, I pray that you are right.
If Miller is right, we need to arrest every law breaker immediately. Otherwise shut up and give in to the socialists.
I think their goal is two-fold. First, They want to tar him before the next election and in essence do themselves by colluding with the news media with the next election cycle what they falsely accused Trump and the Russians of doing in 2016, affect the election. Second, they want a way to keep Trump and the Senate from replacing RBG should the time come. They would then release the articles to the Senate, forcing a trial phase, after which, win or lose, they and their media darlings would peddle the argument that an impeached Trump should not be allowed to appoint a replacement justice. The Constitution does not give them the power to use the impeachment process in this fashion.
Simply says they can remove him from office.
There is no “...with conditions” clause.
The People can put him back.
Show me wrong.
Relax it’s an add on by the dems, nobody is arguing how legally sound it is.
Or somewhat less convoluted, Pelosi sits on the articles, through some twist of fate the Dems win the Senate, then Trump is inaugurated for his 2nd term only to be removed shortly thereafter. I think some of them are so deluded that this is what they are counting on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.