Posted on 12/20/2019 7:07:56 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
While every single 2020 Democratic presidential candidate avidly supports a womans right to abortion, it seems some are considerably more comfortable with calling the procedure what it is: killing a child.
Old sins cast especially long shadows when you run for president, as former New York Mayor and latecomer to the 2020 Democratic primary race, Michael Bloomberg has discovered, and an incident in the 90s in which he rather crassly referred to abortion is making headlines once more.
According to The New York Times, the former New York City Mayor was recently forced to address the heartless, decades-old statements made to a former female staffer upon learning that she was pregnant.
Kill it, Bloomberg allegedly told Sekiko Sakai Garrison, one of his sales executives at the company that bears his name, when she notified him of her pregnancy. Garrison at the time also claimed that Bloomberg angrily complained of the number of pregnant women in his employ, saying, Great! Number 16!
It never ceases to amaze me that anyone would deem themselves fit to lead and represent any group of people, let alone a major city or an entire country, when they look upon news of pregnant women so contemptuously and the murder of innocent children so casually. But, when a sizeable chunk of the population is crying out for the right to murder their innocent children, this is what we end up with, and Bloomberg went on to win three terms as the mayor of New York City after making these comments.
While Bloomberg vehemently denies ever making the statement, Garrison allegedly possesses a tape of an answering machine message from Bloomberg saying, I didnt say it, but if I said it I didnt mean it.
(Excerpt) Read more at activistmommy.com ...
Barely noticed a difference between Bloomingefftard and Kaiser Wilhelm de Bolshevik in the Mayor’s office.
of course this person is taken seriously, leftists have no standards which means anything and everything is permissible to them. disgusting, but they are mental cases . . .
PLANNED PARENTHOOD NEVER IS FOR ANYONE WHO CHOOSES LIFE.
What do they care if someone chooses a or b as long as they make the choice? I mean if pro-choice is all about choice, why the hatred for choosing b?
And when it comes to mirdering people, you are damn right I am anti-choice. No one has a right to murder another. KILLING AN ATTACKER IN SELF DEFENSE IS NOT MURDER.
It’s too bad Bloomturd’s mother didn’t “kill it.”
You have misconstrued “activist mommy.” She is opposing the very same moral horror you are opposing.
Thanks fieldmarshaldj.
I remember reading some ridiculous article that said Buffoonberg was “alarmed” that Warren Wilhelm Jr. would “undo” his record as Mayor. In order for that to occur, the new communist Mayor would have to flip-flop 180o degrees on all his policies and suddenly govern as a pro-life, pro-gun, pro-traditional marriage, anti-illegal alien, free enterprise, limited government tax cutter. He was as likely to “undo” Buffoonberg’s “legacy” as RuPaul is to “undo” Drag Queen shows.
This actually is an old story. I, for one, happen to believe it. But when front runner for mayor of NYC in 2001, Mark Green, made an ad about it, the press went wild in condemning him. It shook his poll ratings, 9/11 happened, Rudy endorsed Bloomberg and the rest is history.
Remember, Democrats say women don’t lie about this
Planned Parenthoods founder...and Nancy Pelosi's grandfather.
John F. Kennedy did some good for our country, and he was a horrible womanizer, so I see your point. Unfortunately, one of his paramours was an East German spy named Ellen Romisch.
Bill Clinton, say would you will about him, also did some good for his country with welfare reform and a few tax cuts, as well as his moderation through “triangulation.” However, his wife was (and probably still is) a screaming harridan who’s antics no doubt put a drag on his popularity, which was still high. Her legendary throwing of objects could be construed as a threat to his physical safety, which could have had worldwide ramifications if she had severely injured him. His moderation did not extend to abortion, unfortunately. He also won his re-election with the help of the Chicomms, and shortly thereafter, nuclear warhead aiming technology was released to the Chicomms from Loral and maybe another company as well.
And of course, he was infamously have his d*** sucked in the Oval Office while on the phone discussing troop movements in the messed-up land formerly known as Yugoslavia. Not to mention foreign leaders could have compromised him with his numerous affairs and boorish molestations of women.
Trump, to his credit, seems to have been on good personal behavior since getting into the Oval Office.
So why should anybody want to take another chance with Bloomberg and this nation’s security?
Enough of these folks inhabit our schools and media, that we’ll be assured an endless supply of new liberals to take their place.
Bill Clinton, say would you will about him, also did some good for his country with welfare reform and a few tax cuts, as well as his moderation through triangulation. However, his wife was (and probably still is) a screaming harridan whos antics no doubt put a drag on his popularity, which was still high. Her legendary throwing of objects could be construed as a threat to his physical safety, which could have had worldwide ramifications if she had severely injured him. His moderation did not extend to abortion, unfortunately. He also won his re-election with the help of the Chicomms, and shortly thereafter, nuclear warhead aiming technology was released to the Chicomms from Loral and maybe another company as well.
And of course, he was infamously have his d*** sucked in the Oval Office while on the phone discussing troop movements in the messed-up land formerly known as Yugoslavia. Not to mention foreign leaders could have compromised him with his numerous affairs and boorish molestations of women.
Trump, to his credit, seems to have been on good personal behavior since getting into the Oval Office.
So why should anybody want to take another chance with Bloomberg and this nations security?
;-)
The only rights unlimited abortion laws are designed to protect are those of men who want unlimited sexual access to women without consequence. Thats the ugly truth at root of this evil.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.