They will disarm us through lawsuits, taxes and slow strangulation, if they can.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: Erik Latranyi
Buy 80 percent lower futures.
To: Erik Latranyi
news item 3 weeks from now:
“industry experts are baffled by an unexpected increase in firearms sales, especially assault rifles . . .”
To: Erik Latranyi
Could this be strategy to set a precedent that these lawsuits are totally stupid? I’m thinking that rejecting the case doesn’t explicitly answer the question. But hearing the case and declaring “This is BS” might prevent all future cases.
But I don’t understand legal matters.
4 posted on
11/12/2019 8:58:35 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: Erik Latranyi
Yes - They will litigate the Mfgs out of existence.
To: Erik Latranyi
I wonder where Justice Roberts is in all this?
6 posted on
11/12/2019 9:00:49 AM PST by
Truth29
To: Erik Latranyi
I think once a lawsuit is lost by a gunmaker, that can then proceed to the SCOTUS. The only reason one should be able to sue a manufacturer is for a manufacturing defect. If the gun used shot straight and reliably, there was no manufacturing defect.
7 posted on
11/12/2019 9:02:48 AM PST by
cuban leaf
(The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
To: Erik Latranyi
Just how does Remington "Market" these guns anyways ???
I never see any ads, and I don't buy trade magazines ?
Wonder what the prosecution has on that ?
Stupid lawsuit.
8 posted on
11/12/2019 9:02:56 AM PST by
onona
(Just tell me where to muster, I'll bring my shit)
To: Erik Latranyi
WOW! Guess booze makers, car makers, power tool makers and on and on and on better watch out.
9 posted on
11/12/2019 9:04:07 AM PST by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: Erik Latranyi
So now if you are a victim of a hit and run, or drunk driver, or any other automobile accident we can sue the manufacturer?
10 posted on
11/12/2019 9:04:51 AM PST by
Dogbert41
(Blessed is He who comes in the Name of the Lord!)
To: Erik Latranyi
This isn’t criminal. How many on the jury? And how must they vote for award?
16 posted on
11/12/2019 9:12:14 AM PST by
umgud
To: Erik Latranyi
"to hold the gun maker liable for its marketing of the assault-style rifle used in the 2012 Sandy Hook school massacre that killed 20 children and six adults"![](https://cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Bushmaster-ad-courtesy-nytimes.com_.jpg)
It's a novel idea, but it also follows that if an AR manufacturer (of which there are hundreds, if not thousands) doesn't advertise, or if it does advertise, clearly shows Bambi or a target in the ad, that's okay.
18 posted on
11/12/2019 9:15:59 AM PST by
Sooth2222
("Every nation gets the government it deserves." -Joseph de Maistre)
To: Erik Latranyi
Does the Supreme court think Auto Makers should be liable for all violence involving vehicles on the road then?
Interesting opinion...
19 posted on
11/12/2019 9:16:04 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Pledge: "...and to the Democracy for which it stands..." I give up. Use the democRat meme...)
To: Erik Latranyi
I would think they’d have to prove that Lanza saw the advertising. Otherwise, why would it matter?
20 posted on
11/12/2019 9:16:57 AM PST by
Twotone
(While one may vote oneself into socialism one has to shoot oneself out of it.)
To: Erik Latranyi
I guess we must place our faith in a jury then. Probably a better shot then the SCOTUS these days.
21 posted on
11/12/2019 9:18:10 AM PST by
Religion and Politics
(It is time for more than one denomination of "Political Correctness".)
To: Erik Latranyi
Sure glad weve got that 5-4 majority in the SCOTUS...
22 posted on
11/12/2019 9:18:25 AM PST by
LIConFem
(I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept)
To: Erik Latranyi
both unconstitutional and illegal
PDJT needs to put more honest people into the courts
23 posted on
11/12/2019 9:19:38 AM PST by
faithhopecharity
( “Politicians are not , born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
To: Erik Latranyi
I just googled "Remington Arms" and this come up:
![Screen-Shot-2019-11-12-at-10-18-25-AM](https://i.ibb.co/6r84c3B/Screen-Shot-2019-11-12-at-10-18-25-AM.png)
I think they should sue google, too. Much more money there! /s
25 posted on
11/12/2019 9:19:59 AM PST by
reintarnation
(not a noob, i just change my identity over the years...)
To: Erik Latranyi
Remington didn’t sell the weapon to the shooter. The mother bought the guns legally, and Lanza chose to shoot her with them. Can’t punish her, so let’s go after the manufacturer. If this is where they’re going, then they need to go after the companies who produced the raw materials that were used to make the weapon. And in the case of wooden stocks, to show how ridiculous this all is, they need to let the company who cut down the trees to make them, to be sued, and also the person who owned the land the trees grew on. This is friggin’ nuts.
30 posted on
11/12/2019 9:24:52 AM PST by
mass55th
("Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway." ~~ John Wayne)
To: Erik Latranyi
How many car manufacturers have been sued because their cars killed people?
31 posted on
11/12/2019 9:26:36 AM PST by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: Erik Latranyi
32 posted on
11/12/2019 9:26:45 AM PST by
MrBambaLaMamba
(Socialism is great, 300 million dead Socialist martyrs can't be wrong)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson