Problem solved.
-PJ
Posted on 10/11/2019 3:14:49 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
Today’s Campaign Update (Because The Campaign Never Ends)
Hey, remember when Bug-eyed Adam Schiff told us that this brave, heroic, fake whistleblower was going to testify live and in person before his committee, like two weeks ago now? – Yeah, that didn’t happen, did it? And it didn’t happen last week, either, and it is not going to end up not happening this week, as the fake whistleblower – who is really just another Democrat leaker of classified information – sees his story falling apart.
Oh, and it probably isn’t going to happen in the future, either, at least not in the House of non-Representatives, where this particular bit of DC-Swap Kabuki Theater is being choreographed for the masses. I kid you not, word came down late on Thursday that the leaker’s lawyers have now asked Bug-eyes and San Fran Nan if their client can testify via…wait for it…oh, you gotta wait for this one…via LETTER!
Yes, the Democrats and their fake news media toadies now propose to impeach a sitting President of the United States of America by letter. I swear I do not make this stuff up. Who could? Friends, Romans and countrymen, lend the fake whistleblower your eyes because you ain’t gonna need none of them damn ears with this particular clown.
Of course, the lawyers are now so aware that their client leaker’s story has fallen so badly apart that they are using the classic Saul Alinsky tactic of claiming he is now receiving “death threats.” Note how this tiresome tactic has been used by every fake journalist and hack politician who has gotten on the bad side of Donald Trump for four and half years now, and each and every one of those people still somehow remains among the living.
If these “threats” really do exist – they don’t – they are awfully damned idle ones.
Think about these “death threats” in the context of this leaker: Nobody knows who he actually is. So, how are these nefarious people threatening him? It’s like threatening the Unknown Comic or Jack the Ripper, or that guy who really killed O.J.’s wife.
Indeed, in their very next pathologically-lying breath, the leaker’s lawyers say this:
The request reflects concerns about whether the whistleblower could testify to Democrats and Republicans without revealing his identity,…
Ok, well, that’s almost a valid concern, given that the very leaky Bug-eyes is the Chairman of the House Intelligence Clown Circus, which is leading this mind-numbingly-stupid farce. But then you realize that Schiff is supposedly on this guy’s side, so what’s the concern, really?
The obvious concern, really, is that this guy is getting cold feet about having to verbally testify under oath in a setting where he would have to field questions from Republicans – you know, the members of the committee who did not help him construct his false fairy tale in the first place. They might ask him tough questions during a live hearing, such as, why are you sitting there, bald-faced lying under oath before our clown circus committee, Mr. Leaker? You know, questions about the stark reality of this matter, in a setting that would require him to form actual words and maybe even complete sentences without the help of Schiff or his Lawfare lawyers.
This entire tiresome exercise veered off into the theater of the absurd on the day the despicable Pelosi announced her impeachment “inquiry”, which itself is not even a real thing. But, with this proposal to try to get the American people to buy into a process in which the House of non-Representatives would seek to impeach a President based on “testimony” from a witness who will not even identify himself to the public, the Democrat/media Propaganda Ministry has truly reached Peak Absurdity.
So, how do you impeach a President without a real witness? No worries there – the Democrats will just double-down on something even more tiresome and absurd. Because that is who they are, and this is what they do.
Continue voting for them at your own risk.
That is all.
Wonderful posting to start my day! This whole theatre of the absurd is comical in its makeup. You just cannot make this stuff up.
I have been waiting for the President to go on the offensive.
I believe he was waiting until the time was right. Well new conspiracy by the Democrats to remove him from office based on lies must have been it.
He came out swinging last night.
He is exposing the swamp for it’s corruption and daring the Democrats to call him a liar. Knowing how the President done things in the past, as soon as they call him a liar he will drop a dime on them and release the evidence.
You might wonder (like I do sometimes) why he does not go the legal route. I think the answer is two fold, one he can not trust the DOJ to do what has to be done (and perhaps even throwing the case so the defendant gets off like they did with Hillary). The other reason is that this is a battle for American’s heart and soul, in other words, a public relation battle.
Saw he kept attacking the media. The purpose there is to make sure everyone knows what ever they print is based on the bias that Democrats pure as the driven snow and Orange man bad. The media is willing to cover up for Dictators like Saddam, and kiss the leadership of China’s ass, and protect sexual predators as long as they raise money for the Democrats. So a court case gains us nothing at this point since the media would spin it as much about nothing.
So I would expect to see more information come from Donald (as he wants his friends to call him) over the next few months.
Well that is my take on the situation, I am sure you have your own.
OK, so an anonymous “whistleblower” provides anonymous testimony via whatever means and commits perjury.
Pretty cool, nobody knows who it is, so no harm no foul, perjury’s OK!
I’m beginning to doubt that there’s an actual ‘whistleblower’.
This is sounding more and more like a total fake.
Remember, it’s the magnitude of the a accusation not the existence of a crime, that matters.
Problem solved.
-PJ
How do you threaten an anonymous whistle-blower, anyhow?
pelosi changed the RULES (and Constitution)
to allow Obama the Moslem to run and ruin America.
she was never punished.
but should have been.
BOL........
Oh, silly....you forget THE REAL BENEFIT of this turn of events.......
Schiff will be staying away from the cameras....... for awhile....(cackle)
"Will the whistleblower sign in, please."
Me, too. The fact that the “complaint” was written in legalese, referencing regulation after regulation, with very little substance related to the supposed act of wrongdoing, suggests that Schiff-for-brains or one of his staff wrote it. Although I have seen speculation that the “whistleblower” is actually someone close to Biden. That makes sense, too, since the complaint is about what Joe Biden did, with a couple of details changed to frame President Trump for it.
Thank God for Mr. Trump! He is a fighter!
Twitter is saying it’s Eric Ciaramella. For more information on him see: https://twitter.com/FOOL_NELSON/status/1182443711353049089
This phantom "whistleblower" with no name or face, is allegedly threatened by people who don't even know who he is, has unsubstantiated third-party hearsay gossip from around the hallway water cooler at the CIA, that says the president said something inappropriate in a phone call that he didn't actually listen to, and after getting help from the democRATS' committee chair to write this bogus complaint, now wants to testify by letter instead of showing their face.
By letter. Really?
This is the "evidence" the democRATS want to impeach the president over.
Surely this is a comedy sketch from SNL.
Trump needs to keep offensively pounding these dumbasses in the House until they are on the defensive themselves.
The democRATS will rue the day they ever attempted to run this ridiculous scam on Donald Trump.
What the Democrats have done to the Rule of Law:
1) The accused no longer has a right to face his accuser.
2) The accuser remains anonymous and can commit perjury with impunity.
3) None of this matters because we assume people are guilty until they prove they are innocent, but we haven’t actually charged them with a crime, so they should abandon all hope of proving they didn’t do it.
Trump used Alinsky to go after the rats and they are not happy about it. I bet they will try to impeach using Trump’s cultural appropriation of “Rules for Radicals” as evidence.
I think it was blown when Trump released the call transcript. The theater of the absurd won't hold up under the light of day.
The transcript, Trump’s other statements and the text messages between the diplomats are what they are and no one’s disputing them.
I don’t think the Dems are going to rely on the WB’s statements anyway.
Yawn...
Kavanaugh, believe all Women. (even if you can’t substantiate anything they say)
Trump, believe all Whistleblowers. (even if you can’t substantiate anything they say)
Uncover a Video of V.P. Biden bragging about blackmailing a Foreign Government with the approval of POTUS Obama. (crickets on steroids)
All Animals are equal, but some Animals are more equal than others. As true now as when Orwell penned those words.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.