Posted on 10/09/2019 10:09:00 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
In case you missed it, take 10 minutes out of your day to watch the clip below. – Laura Ingraham had Rudy Giuliani and Joe diGenova on together for a 9 minute segment Tuesday night, and both men were very blunt in their assessments of the sordid behavior of Nancy Pelosi and her House Circus Clown caucus, the status of the fake impeachment process, and of the Barr/Durham investigation, among several other topics.
Here’s the clip:
For those of you who still like to read stuff, here are some key quotes from Giuliani and diGenova:
Giuliani: “I would love to testify [before the House Intel Committee], give me a half hour to point out ‘Biden inc.’. Four decades of crime. I’d love to do it.”
Giuliani: [After seeing clip of Cory Booker saying he’d love to question Giuliani if he testifies before Senate Judiciary Committee] “I have to go into the arena with Spartacus? Gee, I don’t know if I could handle it. I mean, he’s a really tough guy. I don’t know. Man, he really scares me.
“He was a terrible mayor. I was a mayor of a city [New York] and I turned it around. He was a mayor and the city [Newark] had more crime when he left than when he came in.”
diGenova: “This is why this notion that you are going to keep these witnesses identities secret, while they are trying to nullify an election, commit regicide, and remove a president of the United States is ludicrous. Everybody knows that in all likelihood, Fusion GPS was involved with this person, this ‘anonymous informant’ – I refuse to call him a whistleblower because he is not a whistleblower under the law – and everybody knows that there is a former FBI agent[!] who worked with this whistleblower, as he is now called.
“So, we’re going to learn a lot about the fact that this person never wrote this document, this was drafted by a committee of political consultants and researchers and people affiliated with the Democrat National Committee.
Giuliani: “Adam Schiff is a witness. You can’t preside over a hearing where you’re a witness. Also, how can it be possible that we can’t test the credibility of these witnesses? You can’t come to a conclusion unless you can test credibility. For example, this law firm – Campos, Dampos or whatever the name of it is – was offering money to people. They were offering help with your mortgage, expenses, they were bribing the witnesses to come forward. You don’t think I’d want to cross examine the witness with that?”
diGenova: “Here’s the deal. This [IC] Inspector General is a moron. When he wrote that analysis he was wrong about the law, this was not a ‘matter of grave concern,’ he got slapped down so badly by the office of legal counsel when they analyzed the facts. This guy, Michael Atkinson, is a moron. There is no way around how bad a job he did. He’s an embarrassment to the inspector general cadre.”
Giuliani: “I’d just like to explain to ‘little Schiff’ that propounding and presenting a false narrative of someone’s guilt is called obstructing justice. He did it. He did it right in front of the American people, he did it for about 20 minutes. And he did it again, earlier, when he said he had evidence of ‘Russia collusion’. Where’s your evidence, Schiff? You’re a liar – I’m calling you out as a liar. Where’s your evidence?”
diGenova: “If it weren’t for double standards, Democrats would have no standards at all. This is just insanity…that tape of Schiff, just watching him, bug-eyed, performing like a loon, and watching him pronounce these nostrums that are stupid and unsupportable legally, this is the chairman of a major committee, and Pelosi, you know, trying to keep her dentures in her mouth while she’s talking to him, is just there, abiding by this, it’s outrageous.”
Giuliani: “And it would be funny if it wasn’t such a horrible, horrible trashing of our constitution.”
diGenova: [Asked how confident he is that big things are coming from IG Horowitz’s report and the Barr/Durham investigation] “This is gonna be a bang-bank couple of weeks.”
There’s much more in there, so please watch the whole thing. The fun is just beginning.
That is all.
Is “bang bang” the new “tick tock”??
yeah, sure.
As I said in another thread, I have no doubt that some very damning information will be forthcoming in the next few weeks and months, but I question how many “referrals for prosecution” will be completely ignored; “He/she has already lost his/her job; they’ve paid enough of a price.”
Would that any of us would get the same consideration for far, far lesser crimes...
Joe D is great.
But he has been saying FOR MONTHS “big things are just about to happen”.
We need indictments, we need news of “Mr X spills all, granted immunity and names names” and “grandy jury has been called”
I can believe this. Something in the last few weeks has caused the Dems to panic. It could be this upcoming report, or perhaps RBG is in worse shape than we know. But something is happening.
LOL...my first thought was “BOOM!” has been demoted to “Bang-Bang”...then the fuse will go “pfffft.”
Or just boom-boom, BM for short.
If there aren’t arrests and indictments in the next few weeks, a lot of Trump supporters will throw up there hands and walk away.
Would have loved to see President Trump nominate Joe diGenova as Attorney General instead of the swamp rat Sessions.
I think the last 3 years would not have been in such turmoil.
Hell, there won't even be a report in a few weeks. The current show will drag out until past 2020.
No way in hell the turtle would approve Joe diGenova as Attorney General. I think barr was only approved because he is deep state and is the last clean-up man. I hope he proves me wrong.
Pitter-Patter..........
One can hope...
Yup. However, I'm already a disbeliever.
I agree with you. The Rats are on the DEFENSIVE big time.
Tic toc, tic toc, rah rah sis boom bah, any moment now, b.s.
Totally corrupt fedgov.
Tick tock. Boom. Now Bang.
ZZZzzzz......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.