Seana McKenna (left) as Julius Caesar and Michelle Giroux as Mark AntonyPosted on 07/20/2019 7:12:10 AM PDT by NOBO2012
Last year I went to the annual Shakespeare Festival in Stratford, Ontario. You may remember me discussing it at the time.
They had a production of The Tempest showcasing Martha Henry as Prospero – the revenge seeking wizard exiled to a remote island. The role of Prospero is considered a plum role and highly sought after by men in their fifties or sixties as it is quite possible they would have a 15-year-old daughter. Given that the director chose to fundamentally transform Prospero’s character from Miranda’s father to her mother it’s a bit more of a stretch for the 80 year old actress. But hey, that’s the magic of theater.
Also part of last year’s Shakespearean offerings was Julius Caesar…where the lead was played by Seana McKenna, Cassius by Irene Poole, and Michelle Giroux as Mark Antony – women all. Nor were they the only gender bending roles, several other male characters in Julius Caesar were played by women because:
“It makes a lot of sense that in this day and age, a play with so few female characters should have women playing some of the more juicy male roles.” - BWW
It makes a lot of sense to a certain segment of the population. To the rest of us it just appears stupid and manipulative.
Seana McKenna (left) as Julius Caesar and Michelle Giroux as Mark Antony
Yet CBC Radio seemed surprised that all that gender-bending created a bit of blowback.
This year at Stratford, two of Canada's theatre greats will be playing "trouser roles." Seana McKenna will play Julius Caesar and Martha Henry will play Prospero.
Even in the 21st century, it has unsettled some patrons.
Speaking to The Sunday Edition's Michael Enright, Martha Henry says that Stratford has had complaints about the cross-gender casting.
"They've had people who were really incensed about this. Some even said they weren't going to come."
Martha's response?
"Tell them that if they don't come, they can't complain, because they will have nothing on which to stand. Come first, and see what you think."
Um, okay, I’ll not complain about not spending $100+ per ticket to not see the performance. We chose instead to see the Music Man which was a wonderful production. Even then one had to suspend one’s disbelief somewhat to imagine that in 1912 River City, Iowa a black Henry Hill could pull off the con of selling non-existent band instruments and wooing Marion the fair librarian.
But then, The Music Man is a bit tongue-in-cheek in the believability department to begin with so casting is less critical than it is in oh, say, a historical Shakespearean play where they pretend to be gender blind. Daren A. Herbert, the actor who portrayed Hill explained why he hates the term “colourblind” casting:
“I hate the lie it portrays because it insinuates that you’re seeing something that is not unseeable. People come to see this show and they see me — a black guy. There’s no way to pretend that I’m not.” – Windsor Star
In other words, there is no such thing as “colourblind” casting: nothing is more obvious than the color of one’s skin. It is what it is. And that’s fine. Herbert is a great actor, a great singer and dancer and the musical was a delight. But you know and I know and Daren A. Herbert knows he was chosen for the part because he was black, not despite it. The arts have an agenda. At least The Music Man’s director wasn’t trying to convince us that men and women are interchangeable parts.
Plus they did their homework to ensure that the pluralistic culture of the mythic River City wasn’t a complete pipedream:
Herbert and director Donna Feore did some homework on that period — “and it’s not as though there were no black people there. There was one who was fairly high up in the Republican Party, so we’re not completely out of the bounds of reality.”
Ha ha! A Republican! Now isn’t that a kick in our racist teeth. Anyway, we all know the premise is still a stretch - it’s not a racist thing, it’s a historical thing - but we chose to play along and had a good time.
All of which is a long way around to the lede, allow me to introduce the next Agent 007: Lashana Lynch will play 007 in new James Bond movie.
“It’s a popcorn-dropping moment. Bond is still Bond but he’s been replaced as 007 by this stunning woman,” the source told the Mail.
Either that’s a bad publicity photo of Lashana or I no longer understand the meaning of “stunning.” For insurance purposes however Danial Craig still plays a retired James Bond although his special number has been reassigned. Good luck social engineers of the arts and letters crowd, sooner or later you hit the wall. I think you may have arrived.
Posted from: MOTUS A.D.
FWIW, “Turnabout Intruder” was the final nail in the STOS coffin.
I’m bored with tv choosing actors just for their ethnicisity.
Moreover, the recent series of Both Victoria, and Poldark had black characters shown in a very good light and not one type of ‘racism’ shown to them. In fact, the black chatachter in Victoria helped lead the anti-monarchy mob!
Forgot about that!
Is this notion of a black Xerxes being pushed like a black Cleopatra?
ROFLMAO!!
I don’t think I have ever seen Xerxes portrayed as anything other than Persian except for 300.
Bond: THATS A MAN, BABY! Black, but still a man...I think they’re trying to cover all the bases including the tranny set.
Music Man: I thought it bad enough in that Broderick had black people dancing in the town just like anyone else.
I don’t mind sex and race mixing for high school productions. Maybe no choice, and parts and players are limited. They should all get a chance. But in a wider production with vast choices for players....no, stick to the original plan.
Don’t like Hamilton for that alone, either....sorry, these people weren’t black.
Exactly what I would retort. For Shakespeare. Women WERENT ALLOWED to be in show business.
Imagine Juliet. Yikes.
After Fleming saw Dr. No, he changed his mind and thought Connery was good.
Thanks for the tip. That is not as bad/good as it seemed on the surface.
Still, I like to see a convincing woman in a “tough-guy” role. Haven’t seen a convincing tough woman in 60 years.
The Sandbaggers did.
Sandbagger 2 and 3 had replacements as well as “C”.
How long before Hitler is black?
Or Idi Amin was White.
“Tell them that if they don’t come, they can’t complain, because they will have nothing on which to stand. Come first, and see what you think.”
I dont need to open a septic tank to know I wont like the smell.
I’m a James Bond fan. I was initially really P.O.’d at this stunt casting. With some time to cool down I came to two thoughts:
1) She won’t make it through the movie alive and Bond takes up the mantle again. But this will outrage the SJWs that are not Bond fans but all celebrating this casting (same people who praised the female Doctor Who and then didn’t watch that garbage). But then who is the next Bond once Craig really goes?
2) Craig is going so this is his last film and the next will just be yet another reboot and poor Lashawna will be kicked to the curb.
3) They are actually stupid enough to think that “007” is what makes the movies great, not James Bond and they try to roll with this woman moving forward. End of the franchise.
I doubt it’s item 3, just too stupid. If it was a black man they could still call James Bond than I’d think yah, they might do that. But they took it to far to be possible to preserve the brand with this actress.
So I’ve calmed down. I won’t watch it because it’s obvious they’ve decided to be woke and Craig’s Bond will be getting patriarchy schooled by this woman right up until she gets offed (most likely) and I don’t need any more of that BS in my entertainment choices. But at least I think it’s probably just a PR stunt and there will be a James Bond after this.
Good point about “Hamilton”.
That guy, Lin Manuel Miranda, intentionally chose minority group members to play the parts of people who were white.
He did not choose the best actors/actresses available, he only hired minorities to play the parts of historic figures who were white.
Can you imagine any performance, in which a white or Asian person played the part of Martin Luther King, or Malcolm X, or Louis Armstrong, or Jackie Robinson, for example??
That would not be allowed, and any such person in the performing arts would have been banished, given the Roseanne Barr treatment, for even suggesting that they could pick any but black performers to play the parts of famous black people.
Let it succeed or fail on it’s own merits.
And if it fails, who will be blamed? The producers of these productions, or will they blame the audiences for not being enlightened enough, for being racist and bigoted?
I’m confused. Are James Bond and 007 not one and the same? Some comments here say Daniel Craig will still be James Bond in the movie, but this black woman was assigned the 007 number.
I’m just a casual James Bond movie fan, and perhaps there is a fine distinction between the man called James Bond and the assignment of the code number to an agent. And I perhaps just don’t understand how that works.
I want to re shoot “7 Years a Slave” and reverse cast all the race roles. It would be fun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
