Posted on 07/10/2019 9:48:41 AM PDT by bitt
An investigative journalist who has spent years probing Jeffrey Epstein said that there were girls under the age of 18 on Epsteins plane when former President Bill Clinton flew on it.
Conchita Sarnoff, the journalist, appeared on Fox News this week and was asked about the issue.
Let me ask you this, because tonight President Clinton has spoken out and said I want to make it clear that there was some travel with him, there was always Secret Service, two had brief meetings, people who are trying to tie the two of them together, just like there are people trying to tie Epstein to President Trump, that those are unfair leaps in logic, the Clintons say, Fox host Shannon Bream said.
I have read too much information, and I have spoken to too many people on the inside, Sarnoff responded, noting she attempted to interview Clinton in the past.
I know from the pilot logsand these are pilot logs that were written by different pilots at different timesthat Clinton went, he was a guest of Epsteins 27 times. Many of those times Clinton had his Secret Service with him and many times he did not, Sarnoff added.
Almost every time that Clintons name is on the pilot logs there are underage girls, there are initials, and there are names of many, many girls on that private plane.
So you have to ask yourself, and this is what I asked myself: why would anyone, not only a former president, fly on a plane 27 times that did not belong to him? Sarnoff wondered.
Clintons press secretary said in a statement released after Epstein was charged with sex trafficking that Clinton knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
P
Why else would Clinton fly on Epsteins plane?
We can hear echoes of "I did not have sex with those girls....Carla, Margaret, Pamela, Tanya, etc etc etc...
BILLY HAS CONVENIENT MEMORY LAPSES but the paper trail doesnt lie
<><> Bill Clinton and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein flew on Epsteins private jet in 2002 to meet with the Sultan of Brunei.
<><> The National Enquirer reported flight logs reveal Epstein picked up Clinton at a Japanese naval airport.
<><> The mega-rich Sultan later donated between $1-5 million to the Clinton Presidential Library in Arkansas.
All of that is proveable.
Those mideast potentates are known to have kinky sex fetishes.....was that part of the Clinton deal?
A "kid" pro quo (smirk)
=================================
.....the Clinton Presidential Library is refusing to turn over documents related to Epstein......
Looks like a job for Judicial Watch
425 3rd Street, SW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024
TELE 1-888-593-8442 between 8:30am and 5:30pm EST.
ACTION NOW:
Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414 email at http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact @POTUS or @realDonaldTrump on Twitter!
US CONGRESS SWITCHBOARD: (202) 224-3121
U.S. Department of Justice
Comment Line: 202-353-1555
Switchboard: 202-514-2000
FBI tip line web site----https://www.fbi.gov/tips
FBI electronic fraud unit----www.fbi.gov/scams-and-safety/common-fraud-schemes/internet-fraud '
Almost every time that Clintons name is on the pilot logs there are underage girls, there are initials, and there are names of many, many girls on that private plane.
************
Even if the girls testified against Clinton nothing would happen to him. He still has plenty of friends and defenders in the Just Us system.
The flight logs seem to only identify the underage girls by first and last initial, adults mostly by full name.
They knew exactly what they were doing.
Wonder if the pilots have already given testimony to prosecutors.
Every LibTard I’ve talked to in Real Life about President Clinton and Monica always gives me the, ‘They were impeaching President Clinton over SEX! It was just SEX between consenting adults!’ (Actually it was his lying to Congress, but facts be damned!)
They are strangely silent this time around where minors are most likely involved, and that’s A Good Thing!
However, having sex with a minor boy or girl is bad, but killing them in the womb is not!
Inside the convoluted mind of a Liberal, is a terrible place to be!
I'll go out on a limb here an guess that Clinton is into rape AND into raping young girls...
Democrats believe President Bill Clinton. And have always believed him. Democrats believed it when Clinton said he had never been drafted in the Vietnam War and believed him later when Clinton said he had merely forgotten to mention that he had been drafted in the Vietnam War.
Democrats believed him when Clinton he said he hadnt had sex with Gennifer Flowers and believed him later, when Clinton reportedly said he did bed her down.
Democrats believed the president did not rent out the Lincoln Bedroom to celebrities, did not sell access to himself and the vice president to hundreds of well-heeled special pleaders and did not supervise the largest, most systematic money-laundering operation in campaign finance history, collecting more than $ 3 million in illegal and improper donations.
Democrats believe that Charlie Trie and James Riady were motivated by nothing but patriotism for their adopted country.
Democrats believed President Clinton when he conceded that his administration mistakenly obtained the FBI files of more than 300 people, including many top Republicans and believes it was the result of a completely honest bureaucratic snafu involving security clearances.
Democrats believed Clintons chief of staff, Leon Panetta, when he told reporters that obviously a mistake was made and apologized to the people whose FBI files wound up at the White House. Democrats believed Clinton when he said I completely support what my COS Panetta said about the affair.
Democrats believed Vice President Gore when he said that he had made dunning calls to political contributors on a few occasions from his White House office, and believed him when he said that, actually, a few meant 46.
Democrats devoutly believe in "no controlling legal authority"....but not for Nixon or Trump.
Democrats believed Bruce Babbitt when he said that the $286,000 contributed to the DNC by Indian tribes opposed to granting a casino license to rival tribes had nothing to do with his denial of the license. Democrats believed the secretary when he said that he had not been instructed in this matter by then-White House deputy chief of staff Harold Ickes.
Democrats believed him when he said later that he had told lobbyist and friend Paul Eckstein that Ickes had told him to move on the casino decision, but that he had been lying to Eckstein. Democrats agreed with the secretary that it is an outrage that anyone would question his integrity.
Democrats firmly believe in the Clinton Standard of adherence to the nations campaign finance and bribery laws, enunciated by the president on March 7, 1997: I dont believe you can find any evidence of the fact that I had changed government policy solely because of a contribution. Democrats noted with approval the use of the word evidence and also the use of the word solely. Democrats devoutly believe, as Clinton does, that it is proper to change government policy to address the concerns of people who have"given the president money, as long as nobody can find "evidence" of this being the "sole" reason.
Democrats believe president Clinton lived up to his promise to preside over the most ethical administration in American history that indicted former agriculture secretary Mike Espy did not accept $35,000 in illegal favors from Tyson Foods and other regulated businesses.
Democrats believe that indicted former housing secretary Henry Cisneros did not lie to the FBI and tell others to lie to cover up $250,000 in blackmail payments to his former mistress.
Democrats believe that convicted former associate attorney general Webster Hubbell was not involved in the obstruction of justice when the presidents minions arranged for Hubbell to receive $ 400,000 in sweetheart consulting deals at a time when he was reneging on his promise to cooperate with Kenneth Starrs Whitewater investigation.
Democrats believe, as Harvey Weinstein does, that Paula Jones is a cheap tramp who was asking for it, that Kathleen Willey is a cheap tramp who was asking for it, and that Monica Lewinsky is a cheap tramp who was asking for it.
Democrats firmly believe Monica Lewinsky was just fantasizing in her 20 hours of taped conversation in which she reportedly detailed her sexual relationship with the president and begged Linda Tripp to join her in lying about the relationship and that any gifts, correspondence, telephone calls and the 37 post-employment White House visits that may have passed between Lewinsky and the president are evidence only of a platonic relationship. Journos believe that such innocent intimate friendships are quite common between middle-aged married men and young single women, and also between presidents of the United States and White House interns.
Democrats see nothing suspicious in the report that the presidents intimate pal, Vernon Jordan, arranged a $40,000-per-year job for Lewinsky shortly after she signed but before she filed an affidavit saying she had not had sex with the president.
Nor did Democrats read anything significant into the fact that the ambassador to the United Nations, Bill Richardson, visited Lewinsky at the Watergate to offer her a job.
Democrat believe the instructions Lewinsky gave Linda Tripp informing her on how to properly perjure herself in the Willey matter simply wrote themselves.
Democrats believe, as does Hillary, that The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, Newsweek, Time, U.S. News & World Report, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS and NPR are all part of a vast right-wing conspiracy to malign the saintly Clintons.
Reminds me of the line in the Charlie Wilson's war movie wherein the DOJ was pursuing his use of cocaine. He was asked, did you consider what the chauffeur driver from the hotel might say?
Herewith, for your edification, are the Certified Democrat Degenerates......the scum that vilify and destroy America's Judeo-Christian ethics and values in movies promoted as being "diverse, politically correct, and socially relevant."
HOLLYWOOD'S CERTIFIED DEMOCRAT DEGENERATES
FINANCED BILL CLINTON'S LEWINSKY SEX MESS
According to FEC Info, an Internet Web site (www.tray.com) that tracks federal political contributions, 176 individual donors actually contributed $10,000 or more to the lewinsky-era Clinton Legal Expense Trust fund through Dec 1999. Another 21 donors gave $10,000 in the first six months of 2000.
Thanks to Hollywood's generosity, a total of more than $2.2 million was raised in six months, which was notably more than was collected in funding during the previous four years of his presidencycombined. Hollywood producers and stars made up the bulk of the most generous givers. They included:
<><> Universal Studios tycoon Lew Wasserman and his wife, Edith, gave $60,000;
<><>DreamWorks trio Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, $20,000 each;
<><> producer Ron Burkle and his wife, Janet, $40,000;
<><> producers Peg and Bud Yorkin, $30,000;
<><> TV producer Norman Lear, $20,000.
Entertainment celebrities and executives giving $10,000 included:
<><> singers Tony Bennett and feminist Barbra Streisand;
<><><> actors Michael Douglas and Tom Hanks;
<><> director Ron Howard; producer Gail Zappa;
<><>Black Entertainment Television founder Robert L. Johnson.
cont
<><> How did the Hollyood elite list payments to Clinton's sex defense fund on their corporate statements AND on their tax returns?
<><>How did the "DreamWorks" trio, Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, list their 60,000 dollars to Clinton's sex defense fund?
<><>How did BET list its contribution to Clinton on its corporate statements?
<><> Did Harvey's company list these payments as "business expenses?"
The biggie is the tax element.
<><> Did donors deduct it as a business expense,
<><> was it included in assets, payments listed on organization balance sheets as a "liability?"
<><> Did Clinton document it as "income"?
<><> Were the donors given a tax-free certificate from the Clinton Foundation?
When Bill Clinton was at the height of the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, Hollywood was by his side, offering donations for his legal fees, and one significant donor was a man who is now going through his own sex scandalHarvey Weinstein.
Billionaire Harvey Weinstein raised $1,422,683 for federal candidates and political entities between 1990-2016. Thats small potatoes for his 27 years of rank Democratism, sucking up to feminism and upholding so-called abortion rights as he rampaged and assaulted young women. Adds up to about $5300 a year.
Something tells me there are a lot of cash payments off-the-record being paid. (hat tip outpostinmass2) Crunching the numbers as outpost did does give us a sharper look at the political money game as played by the conniving Clintons.
Harvey also gave a bundle to the nefarious tax-exempt Clinton Foundation and perhaps to offshoots of the Clintons tax-free entities.
Did Harvey's donations to the C/F go to "do-good projects"? Or did they make a circuitous route? Maybe landing back into the Clintons eternal political scams?
Hmmmm.
EXCLUSIVE: Bill Clinton pictured with Jeffrey Epstein’s social fixer at Chelsea’s wedding AFTER severing links with disgraced pedophile
(Getty image at link)
I tried to post from this source once and I thought it was banned. I am glad to see that you were able to post from it. Over all it is a great source.
spent years probing Jeffrey Epstein
poor choice of words
Sure, bubba is teflon coated but do you think h is old ticker is enjoying this sunlight.
Look for sudden changes is volume, tone And frequency from those associated with Epstein.
When the sh*t hits the fan, many of those involved will suddenly go completely quiet or get even louder...
Adults are no different than the children they once were. They have a conditioned response to the (Principal’s office) authority.They either shrink to fly under the radar or they puff up to challenge any suspension of them.
I suspect that many of his associates will attack accusers (girls who come forward) without defending Epstein.
Sure, bubba is teflon coated
Google, Wikipedia and the others have spent the last 2 days sanitizing Clinton/ Epstein search results. Not content with simply removing Clinton, search results for Clinton/Epstein pics were re-directed to Trump/Epstein pics. Orwellian.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.