Skip to comments.
Twitter users expose Google's sexually biased search algorithm.
Twitter ^
| July 3, 2019
| I, Hypocrite
Posted on 07/03/2019 8:07:55 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Twitter thread
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: genders; google; searchalgorithm; sexes
To: 100American; al baby; Allegra; BufordP; EveningStar; Gefn; GunsareOK; JRios1968; Lazamataz; ...
2
posted on
07/03/2019 8:08:47 PM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Show me the people who own the land, the guns and the money, and I'll show you the people in charge.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Repeat after me:
Google is not a search engine.
Google is not a reliable search engine.
Google is a tool of the progressives.
Google is working to undo America.
Google is America’s enemy.
3
posted on
07/03/2019 8:16:01 PM PDT
by
adorno
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Much ado about nothing. I don’t get those search results.
“Women canvas shoes”
“men cancer”
The one about men having babies did show up and the Wikipedia article completely debunked the idea.
4
posted on
07/03/2019 8:21:55 PM PDT
by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Norm McDonald did some hilarious google searches:
“Who were 2016 NWBA champs?”
“Did you mean: ‘Who were 2016 _NBA_ champs?’”
“GOOGLE!!!”
5
posted on
07/03/2019 8:22:56 PM PDT
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: BradyLS
I changed to DuckDuck.go from google. So far I have no complaints.
6
posted on
07/03/2019 8:25:55 PM PDT
by
Equine1952
(Get yourself a ticket on a common mans train of thought. ))
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Do you want to see politically driven algorithms?
Search Google Images: American Scientists.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
8
posted on
07/03/2019 8:38:08 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(No muzzy is fit to hold public office - their cult (religion) is incompatible with the Constitution.)
To: bigbob
Putting a space after the “can” gets the depicted results.
9
posted on
07/03/2019 8:46:25 PM PDT
by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Show me the people who own the land, the guns and the money, and I'll show you the people in charge.)
To: yesthatjallen
10
posted on
07/04/2019 5:42:55 AM PDT
by
Pollard
(If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
To: Pollard
To: yesthatjallen
Wow! You weren’t kidding. A lot of them weren’t even scientists by any stretch of the definition (*cough* 0bama *cough*)
12
posted on
07/04/2019 1:05:37 PM PDT
by
Hardastarboard
(Three most annoying words on the internet - "Watch the video")
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson