Posted on 09/24/2018 11:44:53 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The burden of proof lies with the accuser. If you cannot prove your case, then do not make false rape accusations.
If someone is feeding Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand these lines, I hope they are being led away in chains, as this is one of the most idiotic analysis I’ve heard yet. How in the heck are Republicans trying to silence Christine Blasey Ford who accused Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault from 35 years ago, when they keep giving her time to play them like fools?
Source: CNS News
Giving Christine Blasey Ford the opportunity to testify about her unsubstantiated accusations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is, somehow, silencing her, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) declared Wednesday night.
Refusing to launch an FBI investigation into Ford’s claims is also “silencing her,” Sen. Gillibrand said in a tweet:
“Denying Dr. Ford an FBI investigation is silencing her. Forcing her into a sham hearing is silencing her. And pushing through Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation is silencing her.”
Let’s recap if you will allow me. Christine Ford has no specific date, no place, just a hazy memory of a possible groping from a repressed memory 35 years old. The FBI doesn’t go after gropers based on a foggy memory regardless of how many celebrities believe her. These are just the stop facts and, there is nothing strange here?
(Excerpt) Read more at waynedupree.com ...
Kafkaesque!
The stupid runs deep .....
What ? LOL
Almost.
We want the lying whore on the stand, and under oath, so she can be arrested for perjury.
Only the lunatic left would believe you try to silence someone by giving them the opportunity to speak.
Would some FReeper be so kind as to translate the title of referenced article into English? /semi-sarc
George Orwell, lease pick up the nearest white courtesy phone.
Forcing her to testify under oath undermines her constitutional right to lie. /semi-sarc
Demanding she testify under oath will definitely silence her, once she faces penalties for perjury.
All of the senators involved in this attempted character rape & lynching of this obviously highly qualified jurist should be expelled. His crime? Being considered for the SCOTUS while white, male, admittedly Christian and demonstrably constitutionalist.
I guess Sen. Gillibrand is going to be a character witness upcoming inquiries.
It would be interesting to see someone of her lofty stature at the future inquiries into NXVIM.
Liberal logic.
The fact that so many people in America vote for people like Gillibrand, Waters, Pelosi, Feinstein, Booker, Obama causes me to wonder how we have survived as long as we have...
(I heard someone pro-Kavanaugh say that on Foxnews)
Women just got the right to vote in 1920.
She should have stuck working at a bunny ranch in Nevada and left NY politics alone....it’s got enough “loony tunes” as it is.
Yeah...OK...
How does that affect what I posted???
And people actually voted for her; shows ya the state of their party. Wow...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.