Posted on 07/07/2018 9:34:16 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[FULL TITLE] Yes, It’s True: Peter Strzok Failed His Polygraph Yet Retained Security Clearance and Position on Two Investigations…
I have been asked about this repeatedly:
Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: Strzok himself posed a national security risk while he was investigating Trump & his campaign aides for national security threats. Strzok flunked a 2016 internal polygraph by FBI, yet retained access to TS/SCI classified info & continued to run 2 major espionage probes 4:59 PM - 6 Jul 2018
Validating Paul Sperry’s tweet. Yes, FBI Agent Peter Strzok failed his polygraph and his supervisors were notified on January 16th, 2016, his results were “out of scope“. Meaning he failed his polygraph test. Yet he was never removed from any responsibilities; and against dept policy, he did not have his clearance revoked until he could clear.
This was discussed during the Rosenstein testimony and overlooked by most.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Lying should immediately disqualify you from any position of trust. His clearance should have been pulled. Period.
Go to the CTH and voice your opposition of Sessions. You will be eventually banned. If you don’t drink the coolaid of the popular contributors (and donator$) you will be called troll, etc. Posters there such as : For God and Country, Albertus Magnus, Fleaborg and a few others are Rabid sessions butt lickers.
Spoofing is one problem. False positives are the bigger problem. Interview 100 people over a bank robbery and you will find a significant percentage of innocent people who seem guilty. Likewise you can miss the guilty person.
You can tell the truth and the machine can still catch you in a lie.
The process is that you keep retaking the poly, up to 3 times.
Then you’re denied clearance.
This is for access to our most critical national secrets.
There is NO RIGHT to this info!
It is NOT necessarily about "lying", rather an intent to deceive or withhold.
The gov't has every right to deny you access!
Polygraphy is scientific hocus pocus. There is plenty to get Strzok on without dunking women to see if they are witches.
I’d like to see just how many of these clowns could pass a Yankee White background check.
Sessions is hiding in his office doing his damndest to undermine any prosecutions of the real criminals. Looks like he did a good job of letting the Awan case go bye- bye. Even Luke Rosisk, the reporter who has been on this case called Sessions Magoo.
This is the written gov't POLICY regarding access to seriously classified info.
Per that policy, his access "should" have been denied.
when did God die and leave you in charge.
It is not "my opinion" but the view of the panel of the National Academy of Sciences.
And my personal opinion is that you have a loathsome susceptibility to scientific humbuggery. Given that view I will henceforth discount the credibility of any position you post here.
There is an awful lot about the security clearance process that you are woefully ignorant of.
I always thought they were admissible in court... But, then again, I ain't no stinking, lousy, back stabbing lawyer...
The question was “Is Sessions a part of the Deep State ?”
His answer was “No”.
bookmark
While I believe he’s a traitor photographs aren’t reliable.
No, polygraphy is not admissible in court because the necormancers who operate it cannot demonstrate that polygraphy meets even the low standards of reliability required by our judicial system.
They’re not admissible because they’re utterly unreliable and mean nothing. Pretty much the only thing they’re actually good for is playing the “bad cop” part in good cop/ bad cop and getting people to confess. The whole science they’re based on is utter bunk. The damning part of this whole story is that the FBI still uses this junk science on its own agents.
Not all TS/SCI involves poly. If you fail the poly, you just can’t work poly gigs.
re-ping - title not showing correctly in search..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.