Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: coloradan

They’re not admissible because they’re utterly unreliable and mean nothing. Pretty much the only thing they’re actually good for is playing the “bad cop” part in good cop/ bad cop and getting people to confess. The whole science they’re based on is utter bunk. The damning part of this whole story is that the FBI still uses this junk science on its own agents.


38 posted on 07/07/2018 12:54:22 PM PDT by discostu (Does this kind of life look interesting to you?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
The damning part of this whole story is that the FBI still uses this junk science on its own agents.

Even worse, being a polygrapher is a "profession" with its own lobbying associations, the American Polygraphy Association and National Association of Polygraphers.

44 posted on 07/07/2018 2:58:39 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson