Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Cake Bake Legal Case Reaches Supreme Court
Canada Free Press ^ | 12/11/17 | Douglas Gibbs

Posted on 12/11/2017 9:48:14 AM PST by Sean_Anthony

The Rule of Law has become the Rule of Man, and when that happens, it's normally not very long before the people begin dancing around a golden calf

The Christian Baker who refused to bake a cake with a homosexual wedding message on it lost everything. The business is gone. They went bankrupt. The court case, however, lives on, and The United States Supreme Court has heard the oral arguments on it. This is dangerous. I am not excited when the federal government, especially the courts, begins to stick their fingers into issues regarding our rights. In fact, the Constitution strictly forbids it.

Natural Rights have five characteristics, four of which are listed in the Declaration of Independence.


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: bakery; blogpimp; gaycakebake; homosexualagenda; lawsuit; religiousliberty; ruleoflaw; ruleofman; supremecourt

1 posted on 12/11/2017 9:48:15 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

It’s a shame that this couldn’t wait until we had one more conservative judge on the Supreme Court (which we certainly will soon with Breyer, Ginsberg, and Kennedy at or over 80), but I’m confident that Mr. Phillips and the First Amendment will both find justice and vindication.


2 posted on 12/11/2017 10:01:06 AM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
The way I see it....The government does not have the right to FORCE you to participate in any way, shape or form, in the marriage of any two people.

Sex and religion has nothing to do with it.

3 posted on 12/11/2017 10:01:56 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Bad break Kennedy is still there for this case


4 posted on 12/11/2017 10:09:46 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
The way I see it....The government does not have the right to FORCE you to participate in any way, shape or form, in the marriage of any two people. Sex and religion has nothing to do with it.

That's how I see it as well. Someone from the Cato Institute had a good op-ed about this issue, saying that the homosexual couple suing Mr. Phillips is no different from a homosexual taking a family member or friend to court for refusing to attend his "wedding" for religious or political reasons.

Incidentally, Mr. Phillips never refused service to homosexual customers or anyone who wanted to buy his products, he just refused to custom-make cakes for homosexual weddings. He also refused to custom-make products for (heterosexual) bachelor parties, divorce parties, and anything else that he found morally objectionable. However, straight divorcees had the good sense not to sue him for it or make this a federal issue.

5 posted on 12/11/2017 10:12:20 AM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
LGBT is no more a valid identity with rights than is a habitual drunk or drug user.

LGBT is a choice of behavior. They do not have the right to demand and force anyone to endorse that behavior.

6 posted on 12/11/2017 10:31:28 AM PST by Ciaphas Cain (Liberalism, as with all else evil, can never create. It can only corrupt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck

nAH. Let’s do it now asap. Cant wait for these old leftard geezers to croak. We might have another conservative judge murdered like Scalia..


7 posted on 12/11/2017 10:37:52 AM PST by beergarden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

There have been several times that homosexuals with businesses have refused to serve someone on account of their beliefs. These should act as precedents.


8 posted on 12/11/2017 11:43:40 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck
... I’m confident that Mr. Phillips and the First Amendment will both find justice and vindication.

I'm not, although I hope I'm severely mistaken.

Courts these days try to craft compromises, not adjudicate law. They try to "split the baby," Solomon-style, to appease two contesting claimants, and thereby no one wins.

9 posted on 12/11/2017 11:59:36 AM PST by fwdude (Why is it that the only positive things to come out of LGBT organizations are their AIDS tests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The bake shop could merely put a very prohibitive price on his work.


10 posted on 12/11/2017 12:10:25 PM PST by Joe Bfstplk (A Texas Deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bfstplk

Then subcontract the work.


11 posted on 12/11/2017 12:11:35 PM PST by Joe Bfstplk (A Texas Deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ek_hornbeck
but I’m confident that Mr. Phillips and the First Amendment will both find justice and vindication.

Really?

12 posted on 12/11/2017 12:12:21 PM PST by libertylover (Kurt Schlicter: "They wonder why they got Trump. They are why they got Trump")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

Maybe I’m too optimistic - once again Kennedy’s vote will decide the outcome, and his vote seems to be a coin toss on most issues. That’s why I said that this would go more smoothly had it happened a year or two from now when President Trump gets a chance to replace one or more of the octogenarian liberal judges.


13 posted on 12/11/2017 12:20:08 PM PST by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bfstplk

“The bake shop could merely put a very prohibitive price on his work.”

I read a very good idea a while back, the bakery should make it clear at the time the order is placed that 100% of the monies charged will be donated to a pro-family charity.


14 posted on 12/11/2017 1:45:13 PM PST by Shadow Deamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shadow Deamon

“I read a very good idea a while back, the bakery should make it clear at the time the order is placed that 100% of the monies charged will be donated to a pro-family charity.”

It’s a moral issue so they’d never have done it but if they really wanted to, they could have put a sign above the cash register that said:

“100% of what you pay for your gay wedding cake will be donated to Donald Trump for President, 2020”


15 posted on 12/11/2017 7:30:11 PM PST by Personal Responsibility (If we disarmed democrats gun violence would decrease by 90%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson