Sex and religion has nothing to do with it.
Bad break Kennedy is still there for this case
That's how I see it as well. Someone from the Cato Institute had a good op-ed about this issue, saying that the homosexual couple suing Mr. Phillips is no different from a homosexual taking a family member or friend to court for refusing to attend his "wedding" for religious or political reasons.
Incidentally, Mr. Phillips never refused service to homosexual customers or anyone who wanted to buy his products, he just refused to custom-make cakes for homosexual weddings. He also refused to custom-make products for (heterosexual) bachelor parties, divorce parties, and anything else that he found morally objectionable. However, straight divorcees had the good sense not to sue him for it or make this a federal issue.