Posted on 12/03/2017 12:32:37 PM PST by Jeff Chandler
POLL: Should sanctuary cities be liable for illegal alien crimes?
No
Yes
I'm not sure
Nope.
The perp is the actor of his own agency...he is fully and solely responsible...
Damned right they should be held liable. Criminally as well as civilly.
Can’t say what I’m thinking re that pic.
Anyway, i just voted.
Yes 53%
No 46%
Not sure 1%
A Giant Class Action Lawsuit against every Sanctuary City for previous deaths and or bodily harm and name all the plaintiffs, all those politician's involved. Make it huge and on everyones radar.
Judicial Watch should file it, then let the fir fly.
The question is too simple.
As a civil matter, the right question may be:
If the officials in a “sanctuary city” knowingly released an illegal immigrant, knowing that that person had previous criminal convictions, and that the person was again wanted for deportation as an illegal immigrant, and that person, after release by the sanctuary city commits another crime, causing death, bodily injury or property loss or damage, those who suffer from that crime of the illegal immigrant ought to be able to sue the sanctuary city, in civil court, on the basis of official negligence by the sanctuary city.
My answer is not a quick yes, because the question lacks any context and I think it is context that establishes the right answer.
Of course
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. (multiple votes using multiple internetz devices are allowed!) And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)
YES.
Big answer is if a sanctuary city had someone in custody that they *knew* had committed violent crimes, and still let them out, YES, the city should be on the hook.
I know SF wants to score political points, but this seems more of a "harboring and abetting" criminals.
That's wrong, no matter who you are.
Yes only 55%.
YES!....pure negligence on the part of local and state governments to protect their citizens
Absolutely. No different than taking in a vicious dog that then escapes and injures someone. The owner/keeper is responsible.
The most effective way to deal with Santuary Cities is not to threaten them, not to bother taking away funds, it’s by arresting the mayors and doing massive roundups and deportations. Everyone, just round up anyone here illegally and deport them. Day after day keep hitting them for months. And once that city is cleared of all illegals move to the next one.
Yes 56%
Yes (57%)
No (42%)
I’m not sure (1%)
.
Yes winning easy, as I expected.
.
$hit yes..........
agreed. and I’m sure there are plenty.
Agreed. I can’t believe they even exist.
Needs more Freep-in’
Yes (58%)
No (41%)
I’m not sure (1%)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.