Skip to comments.
Fed Judge Rules Trump Admin Can't Withhold Grants to 'Sanctuary Cities'
MRC TV ^
| September 19, 2017
| P. Gardner Goldsmith
Posted on 09/19/2017 8:43:12 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Interesting commentary on immigration jurisdiction.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
2
posted on
09/19/2017 8:46:27 PM PDT
by
cableguymn
(We need a redneck in the white house....)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The judge is wrong, appeal the decision.
3
posted on
09/19/2017 8:47:55 PM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Ignore, no jurisdiction to rule on this. It’s a BUDGET ITEM.
It can be cut anytime.
Otherwise we can let the school districts put God and the 10 Commandments and bibles back in and get the perverts out and planned parenthood out and they won’t lose federal funding either.
4
posted on
09/19/2017 8:48:42 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
A. Federal District Judge Harry Leinenweber can go #### himself.
B. It’s treason so send in the ####ing national guard.
#### this courtroom bullsh.t.
I dont know about everyone else but i’m mother ####ing sick of it.
5
posted on
09/19/2017 8:50:10 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(The Left should know that if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"John Marshall has made his decision: now let him enforce it!"
"I am an American fighting man. I serve in the forces guarding our country and our way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense." |
6
posted on
09/19/2017 8:51:00 PM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(FMF Corpsman - Lima 3/5 RVN 1969 - St. <font size=4><b> hael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Fed Judge Rules Trump Admin Can't Withhold Grants to 'Sanctuary Cities' I wonder what he'd think of my solution to Snacutary Cities then.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
So according to this judge they can't withhold the funds. Says nothing about the time frame on actually distributing the funds. Make it the lowest priority of everything the DOJ does. That would take the paperwork about 2 years to get through.
8
posted on
09/19/2017 8:54:11 PM PDT
by
TheCipher
(To my mind Judas Iscariot was nothing but a low, mean, premature Congressman. — Mark Twain)
To: TheCipher
Indeed! I'm reminded of Dean Jagger in "Twelve O'Clock High"
"I am an American fighting man. I serve in the forces guarding our country and our way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense." |
9
posted on
09/19/2017 8:58:59 PM PDT
by
ConorMacNessa
(FMF Corpsman - Lima 3/5 RVN 1969 - St. <font size=4><b> hael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Kinda expect that if a city wanted to prevent sodomite marriage, this judge would be eager to approve an embargo of so-called “Federal funds”
10
posted on
09/19/2017 9:01:55 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Secret Agent Man
Depending on how Congress wrote the law authorizing the spending, the judge might be right, although I doubt it.
Conspiracy to violate US immigration law is a crime and the deciding state and political authorities should be arrested and prosecuted. What’s lacking is political will.
11
posted on
09/19/2017 9:02:03 PM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
That’s fine, the sooner that gets reversed by the SC the better. Bring it on Leftist nitwit judges. Your days are numbered.
12
posted on
09/19/2017 9:06:05 PM PDT
by
Bullish
(Whatever it takes to MAGA)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
So? Redefine ‘public safety’. Your king is now in danger. Check. And checkmate.
13
posted on
09/19/2017 9:12:12 PM PDT
by
Viking2002
("If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck." - John Steinbeck)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
nor federal control over immigration are sanctioned by the US Constitution. Sovereignty over one's borders is a fundamental understanding of nationhood. In this area, the states are limited from operating independently.
14
posted on
09/19/2017 9:25:58 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Where is Jeff Sessions? If he can’t challenge these bottom feeder judges, what good is he?
“ZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZ”
Jeff Sessions! Do I hear you?
15
posted on
09/19/2017 11:17:27 PM PDT
by
jonrick46
(The Left has a mental illness: A totalitarian psyche.)
Hopefully the Supreme Court will remedy this problem!!!
16
posted on
09/19/2017 11:40:37 PM PDT
by
KavMan
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
"
The Constitution has not been amended to allow this kind of spending, so why is it that a federal district judge didnt bother to mention that grants from the US government arent provided for in the document he claims to uphold? Instead, he based his ruling on statute, rather than upholding his oath."
In the practice of "Law," when a issue (lawsuit) can be solved via a statute, their is no need to address the constitutional merits. legalize 101. :-(
It's been that way for a very LONG TIME!
17
posted on
09/19/2017 11:55:13 PM PDT
by
Stanwood_Dave
("Testilying." Cop's don't lie, they just Testily{ing} as taught in their respected Police Academy.)
To: Stanwood_Dave
I could not find the statutes...It is late, but perhaps you could link to the ones judge used in his ruling.
18
posted on
09/20/2017 12:12:20 AM PDT
by
Freedom56v2
((Freeper formerly known as bushwon ;))
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
The kcuF they can’t.
All deals have “Terms & Conditions”...
19
posted on
09/20/2017 12:31:34 AM PDT
by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
Well, the DoD can relocate its extensive investments to other locations. And the intention alone would certainly change the Sanctuary attitudes.
20
posted on
09/20/2017 12:44:07 AM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson