Sorry, Mr. Pitts, but Liberalism is Beyond “Silly”

Trevor Grant Thomas.com ^ | 7/13/2017 | Trevor Grant Thomas

[DWW1990]

Well, well, it seems the “T” in LGBT has finally produced a line that even committed liberals are unwilling—or at least, not yet willing—to cross. For liberal columnist Leonard Pitts, a “genderless” child is the “proverbial bridge too far.” Of course, given the sad, sick, rotten fruit of modern liberalism, Mr. Pitts’ conclusion on genderless children raises the question: Why would any devoted liberal of the 21st century be taken aback by an “enlightened” parent who refuses to recognize the clear gender of his or her newborn child?

Touting his rock-solid liberal credentials, in his recent piece, Mr. Pitts points out,

"I have, after all, long taken great pride in supporting LGBTQ freedom. Marriage equality, adoption rights, job protections, I have demanded them. Restroom ID laws, “don’t ask, don’t tell” and so-called “religious freedom” measures, I have fought them."

If modern liberalism “demands” that we dehumanize the unborn and ignore the clear science and morality of life in the womb; if it can procure from U.S. courts a legal redefinition of the oldest institution in the history of humanity; if it has concluded that elementary, middle, and high school students in America have the “right” to use whatever bathroom or locker room they so desire;... if it has decided that men can have babies (Is there a better headline to reveal the corruption of modern liberalism than, “British Man, 21, Makes History by Giving Birth…”?); if it has resolved that a black business owner doesn’t have to serve a “plantation wedding,” but a Christian business owner must serve a same-sex “wedding,” why would any modern liberal be surprised that those under the influence of liberalism would reject one of the tenets of basic biology?

[aquila48]

“I’ll bet they didn’t play games with the foundation.”

Nor the walls. This is just a very expensive facade attempting to be “edgy” and “postmodern”. Inside the facade is a conventional brick building, proving that postmodernism is nothing but a hoax and a fraud.

[Sam Gamgee]

Good points! The wife would say certain people will continue to be tempted by the gay temptation, as for some reason that is how their heads were screwed on during puberty for whatever reason.

[Sam Gamgee]

Thanks. Bookmarked it to share with wife....

[Westbrook]

> The wife would say certain people will continue to be
> tempted by the gay temptation, as for some reason that is
> how their heads were screwed on during puberty for whatever
> reason.

Yes, and an alcoholic will forever be tempted to fall off the wagon, but we don’t encourage that, do we.

[Sam Gamgee]

Yes, and my main concern is “what is the church teaching these days”? By the church I mean the Christian community at large. Now I understand that the difference between my wife and I is maybe only the intensity of feelings about this topic. She leans to compassion and I lean to outright disgust and condemnation. Or the difference is due to the fact the Christian church now avoids even discussing the issue.