Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Efforts Begin To Challenge States Clinton Won
Resistance Feed ^ | 11-25-2016 | Rhett October

Posted on 11/25/2016 7:09:22 PM PST by rhett october

While it appears that Jill Stein has raised enough money, albeit suspiciously, to start a vote recount in Wisconsin, efforts have begun on the other side to challenge votes in three states won by Hillary Clinton: Colorado, Nevada and Virginia.

Operation Sabot 2016, started by the group Oath Keepers is contesting vote totals in Clark County in Nevada; Denver and Boulder Counties in Colorado; and Richmond, Fairfax, and Henrico Counties in Virginia.

(Excerpt) Read more at resistancefeed.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016recount; 2016swingstates; belongsinbloggers; belongsinbooggers; blogpimp; boulder; clarkcounty; clickbait; co2016; colorado; denver; fairfaxcounty; henrico; nevada; nv2016; oathkeepers; recount; richmondva; trump; va2016; virginia; voterecount; yourblogsucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-176 next last
To: Salamander

“To whom they are “praying”, is a mystery.”

Probably the new Saint Fidel.


101 posted on 11/26/2016 1:05:05 AM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

Because that is how it is done.


102 posted on 11/26/2016 1:51:06 AM PST by jimfree (In November 2016 my 16 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sten

What does jill have to gain from all of this? nothing! her money comes from soros and the clinton foundation, nuff sed!


103 posted on 11/26/2016 3:18:35 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sten
to quote 20+ judges... Jill just doesn’t have the standing to challenge

And yet there are reports that Wisconsin os going to recount....

104 posted on 11/26/2016 3:54:20 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dsm69

How about no?

Does no work for you?

If you don’t like you kooky conspiracy crap called out, then try to formulate something that make sense.


105 posted on 11/26/2016 4:43:07 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789
Maybe ballots should be printed with people’s name and address on them, where the choices are randomized to prevent “template” filling, and then have people turn them in in-person showing ID.

No, you don't want names and addresses on the ballots, that opens the door wide for tyranny.

What can be done is for each ballot to have a serial number, and for the serial numbers to be marked first, when a ballot is handed to a voter, and second, when the ballot is turned in for the count. Each person would have to show an ID to receive a ballot, but the serial number would not be linked to the person's name.

Any serial numbers not used at the time the polls close would become invalid at that time.

There are so many technologies in use for validation of documents such as driver's licenses--it is ridiculous that ballot counterfeiting should be so easy.

106 posted on 11/26/2016 4:54:40 AM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: rhett october

Shine some sunshine where the Democrats cheated.

Then watch them scurry for cover.

They are not that strong if the opposition is only willing to fight.

Prosecute a few, and expose their methods.


107 posted on 11/26/2016 5:05:50 AM PST by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhett october
It is news.

It's a blog. It belongs in the blog section. If at all.

It’s a news website, not a blog.

You recycle other people's material, creating none yourself. It's a blog.
Pay attention, son.

It clearly contributed information that generated a lot of discussion here and the pertinent info was provided in the excerpt.

Yeah, about that excerpt.. since you "wrote" it, you can post the whole thing rather than try to drive FR's traffic to your questionable blog.

It is news.

We covered that. It's your blog.


108 posted on 11/26/2016 5:18:54 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource
Don’t forget New Hampshire.

Boy,you've got *that* right.It became a "same day registration" state a few years ago thanks to a small window when the Rats controlled everything.Since then Republican legislatures have tried to repeal it only to be thwarted by Rat Governors.The result...every November of an even year...particularly a Summer Olympics year...bus loads,AND BUS LOADS,of homeless schizophrenics and addicts come up from Massachusetts,claim to live in NH and then vote.

Senator Scott Brown is convinced (and the numbers he presented support his claim) that he was denied a Senate seat thanks to that massive fraud.Former Governor Sununu has said that there's not a damn thing that can be done to stop it...short of repealing the law.

Trump "lost" by a whisker...as did Ayotte.Fraud is the answer.

And yes,I know...Ayotte's a RINO.So she votes with the GOP maybe 50% of the time.I guarantee you that the pig who "defeated" her will vote with the GOP 0.00% of the time!

109 posted on 11/26/2016 5:23:56 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

Is it constitutional to cast aside EVe for a whole state because certification doesn’t meet the deadline? I thought everybody’s vote is supposed to count, or something like that.


110 posted on 11/26/2016 5:29:15 AM PST by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

“There are so many technologies in use for validation of documents such as driver’s licenses—it is ridiculous that ballot counterfeiting should be so easy.”

But securing voting integrity gets into the area of racism, white nationalism, white privilege, holdover form Anglo-Saxon prejudice, and according to Obama, everyone becomes pure and sinless when it comes time to vote and it is crude and boorish to suspect voter fraud, ever.


111 posted on 11/26/2016 5:32:39 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

Also Clinton stole Maine and New Mexico by less than 20,000 votes.

There are a lot of illegals in New Mexico and a lot of Somali’s in Maine.

Heck, Clinton even won Oregon by less than the amount Trump won Pennsylvania.


112 posted on 11/26/2016 5:44:09 AM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Didn’t New Hampshire however elect a GOP governor and now has a GOP legislature?


113 posted on 11/26/2016 5:44:31 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: freeandfreezing
Don’t forget New Hampshire

Scot Brown Brown was all over the place the weekend before the election saying that NH has same day voter registration, that the dems bus people in from MA and they say they have a Domicile in NH and forgot their ID, or something to that effect. Said that is why he lost and why Romney lost NH. They know the approximate numbers.
114 posted on 11/26/2016 6:04:13 AM PST by TimPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource
Didn’t New Hampshire however elect a GOP governor and now has a GOP legislature?

I believe that's correct,However I think it's been a while since NH had both a Republican legislature and Governor at the same time.

115 posted on 11/26/2016 6:10:59 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu
"The House of Representatives has to vote to accept the electoral college votes from each state. If, in fact, it looks like an attempt to steal the election is underway, the House can (and hopefully will) refuse to accept the “new” results. This happened once before in the Hays-Tilden election."

Shhh, don't talk sense to these people.

116 posted on 11/26/2016 6:37:42 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Protocol: "President Trump"; subsequent references "The President" or "Pres. Trump". NO "POTUS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Publius

RE “Trump... Call”

It’s a BEAUTIFUL thing to finally see a Republican with a brass set of cajones, the FYou money, and the WILL to fight back, ain’t it?


117 posted on 11/26/2016 6:38:48 AM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhett october
This bothered me in 2000 with the attempt to steal Florida, however strangely enough, I am not really feeling like this is a threat. Rather, it smells like desperation and fear on the part of the left. I mean, usually I follow these things but from my general observation and reading, this is more diaper-baby tantrum stuff than an actual threat. Yes, there is obviously an end game here but it is from the same people who believed their polls of a Hillary blow-out were true.

And they will fail again.

However, I do agree that the people involved here must be exposed for who and what they are.

118 posted on 11/26/2016 6:48:11 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the differen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

It makes sense alright except this like you who lack English comprehension, numbnuts.

Haven’t you been told before by the mods to stop disrupting threads?


119 posted on 11/26/2016 7:16:49 AM PST by dsm69 (Boycott News Media/Hollywood Advertisers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner; rhett october; DocRock

And (as if by magic) this thread is now in “Bloggers” where it belongs.

But probably that’s only because we don’t have a section yet for “Re-Bloggers.”

You know Gunner, our wee buddy rhett can’t really post this unexcerpted because what he is attempting to call “news” is actually a re-blog of the Oathkeepers website. just about every paragraph in the article begins with “Navy Jack said this...” or “On the Oathkeepers site it says this...”

Of course the honest way to do this would be to simply post the Oathkeepers article and let them get the hits for what they wrote and put his two sentences of comment on the forum like everyone else.

But nooo.....


120 posted on 11/26/2016 7:16:56 AM PST by shibumi (Cover it with gas and set it on fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson