Posted on 11/02/2016 11:37:08 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
She's 'sick and tired' of you.
I suspect that, somewhere in the cancerous bowels of Clinton campaign HQ, there are some ugly internal polling numbers. The candidate, and her surrogates, are starting to sound scared - the kind of “scared” you hear from people who thought something was in the bag, only to have the rug pulled out from under them at the last minute.
You can see it everywhere you look. Hillary’s cronies are melting down during interviews, Obama has abandoned his ‘hands off’ stance in regards to James Comey and seems upset by black voter turnout, and Hillary Clinton, the candidate herself, has gone into feverish fits of accusatory shrieking.
....I am sick and tired of the negative, dark, divisive, dangerous vision....
C’mon, Hillary! Halloween is over!!!! We don’t need such macabre language, which is only fitting for the WITCH you are!!!!
The clintons are criminals! It’s time to sweep them out of power, and move on with President Trump!!!!
#LockHerUp!!!! #DrainTheSwamp!!!!
She has no more ammunition against Trump. She is reduced to rehashing old talking points.
I beg forgiveness from vets and all who served.
But since 0 has been elected I’ve been ashamed to fly the flag. And I’d attract attn if it were upside down. For the first time in my adult life I’ve been ashamed of my country.
If Trump wins, my flag will fly.
She talks ‘peaceful transition’ on one hand, and threatens retribution on the other. Nasty woman.
The way she sounded when she said this was WAY worse than Howard Dean when he did his Dean Scream.
Imagine dealing with that for the next 4 years!
Yes. Hillary and I am sure you had those “intervention” camps all lined up for us. Evil.
“Deplorables II: the sequel”
HRC: “I want you to do me another favor, if you know anybody who says they are thinking of voting for Trump, I want you to stage an intervention”
These people would put us all in reeducation camps a la Cambodia, or at least Vietnam, if they thought they could get away with it.
That a woman who has been politically active, her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bane of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government would rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she totally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most--pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, on the 19th.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but per-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under their experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
Oh puleeez...I am likely to break the TV screen!
You’ve written a variant of one great George H. W. Bush quote (no sarcasm):
“You better be nice to your kids, because they’re the ones who’ll decide what nursing home you go to.”
Times have gotten very tough for the majority of people in this country and they are going to get tougher. This is why men like Trump and Bernie Sanders so readily find a following.
Decent, average, hard working people who have followed the rules find themselves in diminished circumstances while crooks are showered with money and privileges.
Hillary is a regressive reactionary anachronism that the crooked old men of Wall Street and Beltway establishment are trying to foist on this country against its will though the agency of money and power. Despite her left wing rhetoric she is Charles I or some thugish South American Generalissimo not Hugo Chavez.
Telling poor and desperate people that their hunger and fear is a crime is not a wise strategy for anyone that understands the history of the French and Russian revolutions. When you call desperation “radicalism” you get radicals not the end of the desperation.
Trump is a responsible experienced man that is committed to the laws and norms of our constitutional republic. If they defeat him the next agent of change in this country will be, from their perspective, a monster that has slithered out from the pit. He will be at the head of a red storm that will sweep all these people before them.
The Democrats, the GOPe, the rich, the privileged, had better start listening more and sneering less.
Watch "Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/kypl1MYuKDY (19.46 min)
I've always believed this to be true, even when her campaign and the MSM were telling us it was over. Hillary's increasing desperation while out on the stump is obvious.
Such a hateful, bitchy, evil woman
“Well she is very sick and very tired.”
Not half as sick and tired as we are of her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.