Posted on 10/28/2016 10:00:19 PM PDT by FredZarguna
I still think we need miracles (please God) to prevent the election results from being rigged.
Not necessarily so, Fred.
According to http://nypost.com/2016/09/22/nypd-investigating-weiners-sexting-relationship-with-teen/:
Prosecutors in US Attorney Preet Bharara’s office have issued a subpoena for Anthony Weiner’s cell phone and other records, law enforcement sources said.
NYPD detectives and the Manhattan DA’s office are also “looking into” allegations that Anthony Weiner engaged in a months-long sexting relationship with an underage girl, sources told The Post Thursday...
I am not knowledgeable enough to speak with authority but I thought US Attorneys issued subpoenas for US business not for municipalities.
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. I'd much prefer NYPD was holding the reins than the feds.
You realize that none of these are mutually exclusive and in fact, ALL, are probably true. The answer to number one is Wikileaks.
In fact the answer to EVERYTHING is Wikileaks. Whatever any of these clowns tries to do will be blown to pieces by Wikileaks so it is irrelevant. Even trying to “drain the pus” out as the Clinton’s like to do is futile. It just draws attention to the thing.
My theory, Clinton is cratering in the REAL polls. Zero does not want her dragging him down with her. Sure, he can pardon her BUT WHO IS GOING TO PARDON HIM? Realistically, even if he pardons her, like Ford pardoned Nixon, he has to give SOME idea of just what it is, generally, the pardon covers. If it is the server and emails, she is still vulnerable on the Foundation. You get the idea. Whatever the pardon covers she is so corrupt there will still be things to get her on the pardon did not cover. The Klown can’t pardon her for “everything she did for years”. Read Ford’s pardon, a little vague but still focused on certain acts.
You are under estimating Wikileaks, IMHO. Even if the BSM won’t cover them the leaks throttle what they DO cover. The Wikileaks are KILLING them.
The fix was in before the investigation started. Let’s recall that someone chose to start the investigation into Hillary’s email server without a grand jury ... hence no subpoena powers.
Have to be ...... we really have to be ! Nite !
Preet Bharara is supposedly a good guy (well... That was allegedly true of James Comey, and we now know how untrue that was.) But Bharara has gone after some very high profile Dems in New York State and brought them down. I can't believe the people behind this cover-up can be happy that other agencies have seen the things they granted immunity and destruction of evidence in order to conceal.
My theory: They knew that Hillary was going lose the election, and needed a way to get her to step down so they can postpone the election and replace Hillary with someone else who can actually win against Trump.
Also, I just perused DU (I’m going to hit the shower imminently as a result), and they’re convinced that this will galvanize the left and cause a bump in support for Hillary as a result. Could this whole stunt have been a convoluted scheme to whip up the democrat base?
Maybe it’s been nibbling at Clinton’s support, but the Wikileaks haven’t resulted in the knockout blow that it would in a sane world.
Obama knee capped poor old Hillary . This is a battle of to mob bosses . The Clinton foundation was exposed as money scam for Bill from Wikileaks. No better time than know to take out the only person standing in the way from being king and queen of the leftists . Follow the money who benefits the Obamas. Who becomes the opposition to Trump .Start a foundation roll in the cash .
You can bet your bippy that we’re on her hit list.
Comey never argued that Hillary didn’t break the law, but did not recommend prosecution because there was no intent. So all they need is an email or other evidence that proves intent, and her goose is cooked.
....”In the meantime, 0bama was leveraging this investigation against Hillary!® behind the scenes. He really does hate the Clintons, .....”
Just the opposite.
#6. Clinton was given the Secretary of State position as an agreement upon conceding in 2008 to Obama. They despise him, but could not lose their bind on the blacks, so her total backers used the “Secretary of State” facade, to conceal an operation Shadow Executive Branch. Nothing from Obama has been original. The oppressive BodyMortgage Act, originated from the Clinton backers, as does TPP,( making sure they’re exempt of course).
She won’t go quietly into the night. If she falls she will scorch the earth and Obama will go too.
The Wikileaks disclosure of the Doug Band memo on Teneo and the CF is a smoking gun. The FBI can’t ignore it. Huma was an employee of the State Department, Teneo, and the CF at the same time. Her emails probably contain incriminating evidence of the pay for play shenanigans of the CF.
The NYPD IT department has proved to be 3 times more proficient in identifying a threat than the FBI. Apparently there is some pride on the line. About three more days of the October surprise are remaining. The National Enquirer is promising another bombshell next week—yawn. The problem now is not only the new laptop but any WIFI connection to that equipment that essentially made it a public broadcasting system for anyone willing to snoop. The threat to the Clinton campaign going off message is severe—where are my focus groups at this late hour?. The danger is any average person can understand what Weiner did without an explanation by the MSM. And when Hillary’s shoe fell off, Dick Morris was interested again. And somewhere in the background someone is whispering to Trump that he doesn’t have to play the cards he is holding, she will fold.
Comey's legal interpretation was flat out wrong.
The espionage act specifically says that gross negligence alone, with or without intent, is a violation of the statute.
But in any case it is a moot point. One can never really know what is in another person's mind, so the the question of intent invariably requires specific tests for its application, which all prosecutors use. One of them is action of apparent "guilty knowledge." Clinton repeatedly refused requests to provide evidence, and by her own admission deliberately destroyed evidence. That alone is proof of intent in most courtrooms.
Comey's legal interpretation was a facile rationalization to do what his masters told him to do.
To get to the place where a Friday night massacre is a reasonable option there must be some upper echelon operative who wants Trump elected. Who that might be and why escapes me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.