Preet Bharara is supposedly a good guy (well... That was allegedly true of James Comey, and we now know how untrue that was.) But Bharara has gone after some very high profile Dems in New York State and brought them down. I can't believe the people behind this cover-up can be happy that other agencies have seen the things they granted immunity and destruction of evidence in order to conceal.
Where has that been established? Because the investigation has been reopened?
Preet Bharara is supposedly a good guy (well...That was allegedly true of James Comey, and we now know how untrue that was.)
We know very little of verifiable substance about either of those men. Suspicions at this point.
But Bharara has gone after some very high profile Dems in New York State and brought them down
US Attorneys do that. Unless they are told not to. You know that is not a factor in their character quotient.
I can't believe the people behind this cover-up can be happy that other agencies have seen the things they granted immunity and destruction of evidence in order to conceal.
I doubt they're happy, too, but I also doubt the instructions from above will not be passed on if needed by a high ranking administrator to middle management to be followed by a city investigator exactly as they are spelled out by his superiors. It's an organizational thing.
All I'm saying is I'm doubtful NYPD is holding the kind of trump I was hoping they did.
Thanks for the fabulous post. It provides a great platform for discussion,.