Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2016-10-28 James ("Jimmy the Weasel") Comey Reopens The Case: Some Theories.
FrederickJZarguna | 2016-10-28 | FredZarguna

Posted on 10/28/2016 10:00:19 PM PDT by FredZarguna

So, here we stand on the brink of the Presidential election in 2016 with what very well might be the last hope for the Republic, and for reasons nobody seems to quite understand, today the FBI dropped a bombshell on the Clinton campaign.

The BIG QUESTION is Why? Why Now? The obvious answer, that the FBI found additional evidence of criminality on the part of Hillary!® or her minions, flunkies, and stooges is, to say the least, preposterous. Anyone with the IQ of a mollusk has known Hillary!® is as guilty as Benedict Arnold, the Rosenbergs, Aldrich Ames, … OK, pick your favorite (or least favorite) traitor as the case may be. James Comey knew it, too. But after slamming Hillary!® non-stop in his press conference, he ultimately backed off on recommending indictment with his famously tortured reinvention of the espionage statute.

So, she was off the hook. What’s happened?

Here are some theories. Please add your own.

Theory 1: Another agency (or Agency) has been able to verify that someone does indeed have all of the Clinton emails, and has given the FBI the heads up that a shoe is about to drop, and they’d better get ahead of this before the proverbial poop pummels the propeller.

Theory 2: There really are some people left at the Bureau with some integrity, and they’ve threatened to go live. Comey’s calculation then becomes: what hurts more, high profile resignations and or/whistleblowing and all the damage that goes with that, or defenestrating Her Thighness? (That’s “throwing under the bus,” for the illiterate DU’ers lurking here.) No doubt senior FBI officials spilling the beans could hurt Comey, The FBI, the Administration, and Clinton a lot more than today’s FBI statement. And seen in this light, the decision is simple damage control: the best way to put a lid on the insiders threatening Comey is to throw them a small bone that’s going to amount to nothing in a few weeks. And Hillary, like Sauron, “can deal with the little people later.”

Theory 3: The revelations that over a million dollars were laundered to the Deputy Director of the FBI through his wife’s unsuccessful state senate bid was just more than even the corruptocrats at DOJ could stand. [Right. OK. I know, I know. Over 90% of the people at DOJ have donated to or openly support Clinton, so this theory is about as dead on arrival as the Phlogiston theory of Combustion. I mean, really, a woman who can stand up in front of the country and claim that her 30 years in public service – which have netted her and her corrupt family a quarter of a billion dollars -- have been a “sacrifice,” simply has no shame. And neither does anyone who supports her. Still, just throwing it out…]

Theory 4: The folks handling the Weiner investigation actually did discover some things, and given how ridiculous the whole probe into Anthony Weiner was, these folks may have been lower level agents who haven’t yet been “made men” in The Clinton Global Crime Family. As a result, what they found on Huma Abedin’s computer threatened to reveal some of the things that Comey and the more senior FBI agents and DOJ lawyers had already deep-sixed with their generous immunity deals and deliberate spoliation of evidence. Again, as with Theory #2, today’s announcement is simply a way to get a lid on the new evidence, destroy it, and let the whole thing blow over. [And if you threw up in your mouth a little bit at either or both of the phrases “Weiner investigation” or “Probe into Anthony Weiner,” you are most certainly not alone, believe you me.]

Theory 5: This is basically an extrapolation of the position taken by Ed Klein in his book Guilty as Sin in which he paints a very sympathetic picture of James Comey: Straight shooter, family man, devout Catholic.

All the Good Stuff.

According to Klein, Comey was allowed to run a full, complete, and straight-up investigation of Hillary Clinton. In the meantime, 0bama was leveraging this investigation against Hillary!® behind the scenes. He really does hate the Clintons, and he tried desperately to get Joe Biden to run, and failing that attempted to persuade Fauxcahontas (or is it Lie-a-watha?) Anyway, Joe is too old, too tired, and too devastated by the death of his son, and Princess Cherokee-Cheekbones is not really much of a politician and was not the least bit interested in getting in the oncoming headlights of the Clinton Smear Machine. When he realized he wouldn’t be able to get either of them – or anyone else of standing -- on board he told Lynch to shut down the FBI investigation.

In Klein’s theory, Lynch told Comey that if he recommended indictment, she would try the case in such a way that Hillary would be acquitted. The result, anathema to Comey’s sensibilities, would be that he and the Bureau would be disgraced, having inserted himself and a supposedly apolitical law enforcement organization into a presidential race running full throttle in a partisan manner, and that from the acquittal Hillary would emerge inoculated from future examination, and stronger than ever.

This theory explains why Comey took the unprecedented step of laying her guilt out before the whole world only to pull back the football with a bizarre legal theory at the last moment. And it might explain today’s announcement: he’s been trying to do the right thing all along, without having any legal apparatus behind him. This theory explains a lot, but it has problems, not the least of which is Comey’s dubious clearing of the Clinton Global Crime Family on two previous occasions, and the financial connections he and his family have enjoyed to “The Foundation.”

Personally, I think a lot of Klein’s argument makes sense, but frankly is too clever by half. I think the part about 0bama wanting somebody else is true. I think the part about him allowing the investigation to go on to pressure both Clinton (to not run) and her potential rivals (to run) is also true. And certainly the part about telling Lynch to pull the plug – if he even needed to – is true as well. But I stop right there, because I believe Comey has been in on The Fix from the git-go.

So, what think you, fellow insomniacs and deep thinkers? Is James Comey a latter-day Thomas More, hoping to tightrope walk the damning moral hazard on one side of the abyss and the dangerous personal consequences for himself on the other? Or is he Thomas Cromwell, the kind of corrupt enabler that every tyrant requires?

Personally, I believe it’s the latter; and I believe that whatever motivates today’s announcement, it has been done for one reason and one reason only: someone higher up the food chain than Hillary Clinton is potentially exposed by new revelations, and this is the least damaging way to make them go away. And hey, a country that elected He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Middle-Named twice, might just go ahead and elect Hillary in spite of all the criminality.


TOPICS: History; Politics
KEYWORDS: clinton; comey; fbi; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: FredZarguna

I think it might even be simpler than all that. I’ll bet the Abedin/Weiner breakup is NOT amicable. Weiner noticed some “great stuff” and shoveled it in the direction of the authorities. Weiner stuck it to them.


21 posted on 10/28/2016 10:14:43 PM PDT by Scooter100
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
Believes Trump might just win, and if he does, and appoints a spec prosecutor, Comey's butt, and many of his cohorts' butts will be in the sling, if not swinging from a rope.

So, he reignites the investigation, and if TRUMP wins, proceeds with full steam, gathering accolades for being untouchable..

If the grifter wins, he pulls the flush lever, keeps his job and monies, wins both ways.

22 posted on 10/28/2016 10:15:48 PM PDT by going hot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Comey is #2.


23 posted on 10/28/2016 10:16:05 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Oh, Rolling Stone points out that the NYPD is involved with the Weiner investigation.

Then there would be evidence that the Weasel can’t get to.

That would explain it. The weak part WAS that the Weasel would let someone who wasn’t a crook investigate Weiner.

Having another agency involved, that explains it perfectly.


24 posted on 10/28/2016 10:17:07 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

It’s consistent with all of them except possibly the last. One question, if Ed Klein is correct, and Comey was basically a helpless cop thwarted by higher-up lawyers, is why would he make the immunity deals? However, to my knowledge, we do not know who actually made the proffers. It could have been made by DOJ lawyers working the case with the FBI. In Klein’s book he claims that the other alphabet agencies, NSA, CIA, DHS refused to help the FBI with any of the forensic computer examinations. It may well be that the investigation was crippled by DOJ as well.


25 posted on 10/28/2016 10:18:50 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Let’s be dangerous; our enemies are.


26 posted on 10/28/2016 10:21:39 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: theoilpainter

The Bernie supporters must be losing their minds even more than they already have!


27 posted on 10/28/2016 10:22:02 PM PDT by ozaukeemom (I am deplorable and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

She operates under the assumpion that it’s not a lie if you really believe it.


28 posted on 10/28/2016 10:23:52 PM PDT by Gamecock (Gun owner. Christian. Pro-American. Pro Law and Order. I am in the basket of deplorables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
I don't believe Comey is a person of integrity, at this point, so any theory that relies on that is out. I've been trying to think of a plausible reason that they'd let this drop...WikiLeaks has been dribbling out info for months -- people who already care, care, and nobody else pays any notice and the media doesn't cover it, so it's not like whatever is in these emails, no matter how bad, would have damaged her. If they wanted to get it out and let it blow away...They could have waited two weeks. They could have just sat on it and nobody would have been the wiser and there would have been no chance whatsoever that it might influence voters against Clinton. There is no reason that they would have let this drop if they were trying to help Clinton, because even if this ultimately doesn't hurt Hillary, there is no way that it can help her.

But at the same time, I can't think of a single reason that they'd want to hurt her chances. Some people are saying that Obama is implicated somehow, and they're throwing Clinton under the bus in order to save him, but wouldn't his best defense be to see her elected? How on earth would it help him to have Trump at the helm government, controlling the FBI and DOJ? Another theory is that they're sure Clinton is going to lose and Comey is kicking CYA-mode into high gear already, but considering how tight this election will probably be, with the fraud and everything else, this seems awfully premature.

Will Comey come out in 5 days and say, "Well, we looked into it and it was nothing. Looks like Clinton is double-dog cleared of any wrong-doing, have a nice election, folks."...? If so, why bother with this entire stunt at all? I just can't figure out why this is happening, but considering the source, the intention behind this can't be for the good.

29 posted on 10/28/2016 10:24:32 PM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Flag burners can go screw -- I'm mighty PROUD of that ragged old flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
So it is a Seinfeld thread!
30 posted on 10/28/2016 10:25:01 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; TWhiteBear; WildHighlander57; ...

See article.

.

31 posted on 10/28/2016 10:25:02 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

I suspect an internal revolt at the FBI. Career agents did not like being made to look like bought-off Clinton stooges like Comey.


32 posted on 10/28/2016 10:25:39 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scooter100

Who has the child?


33 posted on 10/28/2016 10:26:08 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
This whole thing reminds me of one of the major turning points in Water Gate, The Saturday Night Massacre.

This is the Friday Night Massacre and I think it is going to end Hillary's Political career.

34 posted on 10/28/2016 10:28:58 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3486276/posts

Another point of view.


35 posted on 10/28/2016 10:28:58 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
this one is not so affectionate.


36 posted on 10/28/2016 10:29:16 PM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

Who has the most to lose if Hillary is elected? It’s not Trump. It’s Obama.


37 posted on 10/28/2016 10:29:23 PM PDT by REDWOOD99 ("Everyone should pay taxes. Everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

I like your take on Comey


38 posted on 10/28/2016 10:31:40 PM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tiki
"Who has the child"

Boy, that's a good question. Weiner in jail, Huma a career political animal. Kid goes where....with the Muslim Brotherhood Grandma?

39 posted on 10/28/2016 10:34:00 PM PDT by Scooter100
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
but we already know that Obama lied...so if it's him no big deal already.

Not so fast.

Fact: We know 0bama lied about the server. However, what if one of Huma Abedin's emails from Hillary!® says something like: "Barack is going to handle the FBI thing."

That is a substantially different kind of involvement.

40 posted on 10/28/2016 10:40:30 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson