Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheriff Clark Disinvited from University Speech, Campus Official Lied
Gun Watch ^ | 14 October, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 10/21/2016 6:48:07 AM PDT by marktwain



Sheriff David Clark was scheduled to speak at New Haven University.  He had been invited, and had accepted the invitation.  After the University considered the political ramifications, the person who invited him, Patrick Malloy, came up with a face saving excuse to revoke the invitation.  He said that Sheriff Clark made extravagant demands, such as requiring a "presidential suite" to speak at the event. Sheriff Clark produced emails that showed the arrangements and correspondence. The excuse was false. It compounded the lie with the injustice of smearing Sheriff Clark as being unreasonable and greedy. From the University of New Haven facebook.com:
I would like to apologize and take responsibility for my actions that have compromised the University of New Haven and put the community in a difficult position with regard to my discussions with Sheriff David Clarke to speak at the University.

I approached Sheriff Clarke in June about speaking at the Markle Symposium. In the subsequent weeks, I exchanged multiple emails with his assistant about logistics. I was not completely accurate, though, with the information I shared with University officials. I indicated that Sheriff Clarke made a series of demands around his travel arrangements. I unintentionally misrepresented what the Sheriff asked for.

Ultimately, in collaboration with the dean of the Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences, we decided not to finalize his arrangements to visit campus when it was determined his appearance could potentially become politically polarizing in light of the imminent presidential election. My colleagues and I in the Lee College determined that this talk would be more appropriate for another time.
Sheriff Clark is an outspoken defender of the Second Amendment, and a blunt critic of Black Lives Matter (BLM).

Sheriff Clark says that when his assistant was contacted about the cancellation, he was told that it was because Sheriff Clark has vocally opposed Black Lives Matter.  From fox61.com:
According to Clarke, his assistant was told by a representative at UNH that it was due to his very vocal in his stance against the Black Lives Matter movement, which he refers to as Black Lies Matter.
“The gentleman was very apologetic, he was sincere, he felt bad about having to make the call but he said they were pulling back the invitation and were dis-inviting,” Sheriff Clark told FOX 61 over the phone. “He said people at the university didn’t like some of the things I’ve said about Black Lives Matter.”
The only reason this is being discussed is that the alumni and students got word of the cancellation at New Haven and were not happy about it. A student, Brian Shamrock started a petition to force an apology.  New Haven University is felt the heat, and were compelled to offer the explanation.  According to bluelivesmatter.blue:
Sheriff Clarke had recently impressed a Senior Lecturer, Patrick Malloy, who saw him speak at the International Association of Financial Crime Investigators-Connecticut Chapter, Spotlight on Fraud IV Training Conference. As a result, on June 24, 2016, Sheriff David Clarke was invited to be the keynote speaker.
I feel for Patrick Malloy.  He was put in a difficult position. He thought he could invite a prominent Sheriff to speak about forensics at a Criminal Justice and Forensics school without checking with Black Lives Matter and the censors of political correctness. He did not know that Sheriff Clark supported the Second Amendment.  He did not know the Sheriff opposed BLM. As a plus, the Sheriff was black and a great speaker. It was a big mistake.

I suspect he was under tremendous pressure to prevent Sheriff Clark from appearing.  The intimidation, threats, and criminal activity at Black Lives Matter protests is enough to place significant pressure on anyone, but especially someone who did not understand that it would be deployed against them, when they made an innocent decision.

The smear may have been unintentional.  Malloy says it was.

It is the insidious form of censorship known as political correctness.

A Senior Lecturer at New Haven University, Patrick Malloy, smears a black sheriff for political purposes, to stop him from speaking. And he gets a pass.  It appears that Malloy was well intended, but he and the college succumbed to the thuggish tactics of BLM.

It does not bode well for the future of the United States.


 ©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch


TOPICS: Education; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; newhaven; patrickmalloy; sheriffclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Invite a speaker. Find out Black Lives Matter does not like him. Lie about it and disinvite him.
1 posted on 10/21/2016 6:48:07 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

How many Democrats enervget uninvited?
We need lists of each on this.


2 posted on 10/21/2016 6:49:33 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It sounds like New Haven “University” is full of liberal “democrat” racists to me.


3 posted on 10/21/2016 6:50:00 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Clintoon will be the "historical" first unindicted felon to sit in the Oval Office. Be proud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
It really ticks me off when a writer can't even spell the name of the subject of the article correctly, all throughout..

That's 'CLARKE' with an 'E', DAMN IT!

4 posted on 10/21/2016 6:52:14 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

As far as I know Sherrif Clarke is still a democrat.


5 posted on 10/21/2016 6:53:05 AM PDT by Romans Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Yep, racist!


6 posted on 10/21/2016 6:54:14 AM PDT by Leep (Just say no to half dead hillary and wrong lane kaine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It is my belief that most Universities and Colleges in this country are fast becoming what I’d call 21st Century Gestapo indoctrination centers. They only lack that final course of instruction that might be called something like “Democracy Guardians” (or similar) to make it all complete.


7 posted on 10/21/2016 6:56:00 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I unintentionally misrepresented what the Sheriff asked for.

Total and complete BS. That is an impossibility. The Sheriff should use the emails and his statement as grounds for a libel lawsuit.
8 posted on 10/21/2016 6:56:42 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
...... the person who invited him, Patrick Malloy, came up with a face-saving excuse to revoke Clarke's invitation. He said the Sheriff made extravagant demands, such as requiring a "presidential suite" to speak at the event (which Clarke proved not to be true).....

Molly never had to deal w/ Hillary's speaking demands.

Here's Hillary's demands for one $300,000 university speech....inside dope on how Hillary prepared for a speech.

=============================================

CIRCA 2014--WASH/PO By Rosalind S. Helderman and Philip Rucker

Plans for UCLA visit give rare glimpse into Hillary Clinton’s paid speaking career. She was paid $300,000 to speak to UCLA students and faculty in March 201. When officials at the University of California at Los Angeles began negotiating a $300,000 speech appearance by Hillary Rodham Clinton, the school had one request:

Could we get a reduced rate for public universities? The answer from Clinton’s representatives: $300,000 is the “special university rate.”

That e-mail exchange and other internal communications, obtained this week by The Washington Post under a Freedom of Information Act request, provide a rare glimpse into the complex and meticulous backstage efforts to manage the likely 2016 presidential candidate’s lucrative speaking career.

At UCLA, efforts to book Clinton and then prepare for her visit were all-consuming, beginning almost immediately after she left her job as secretary of state on Feb. 1, 2013, until she delivered her Luskin Lecture for Thought Leadership speech on March 5, 2014.

The documents show that Clinton’s representatives at the Harry Walker Agency exerted considerable control over her appearance and managed even the smallest details — from requesting lemon wedges and water on stage to a computer, scanner, and a spread of hummus and crudité in the green room backstage.

Gene Block, UCLA’s chief executive and chancellor, presents a medal to Hillary Rodham Clinton after her speech at the school March 5. (Nick Ut/AP)

Top university officials discussed at length the style and color of the executive armchairs Clinton and moderator Lynn Vavreck would sit in as they carried on a question-and-answer session, as well as the kind of pillows to be situated on each chair. Clinton’s representatives requested that the chairs be outfitted with two long, rectangular pillows — and that two cushions be kept backstage in case the chair was too deep and she needed additional back support.

After a lengthy call with a Clinton representative, UCLA administrator Patricia Lippert reported to campus colleagues, “She uses a lavalier [microphone] and will both speak from the audience and walk around stage, TED talk style. We need a teleprompter and 2-3 downstage scrolling monitors [for] her to read from.”

During a walk-through of Royce Hall five days before the lecture, the e-mails show, Clinton’s team rejected the podium planned for her use during her 20- to 30- minute speech, setting off a scramble on campus to find a suitable podium and rent a new university seal to match.

In the nearly two years since stepping down as secretary of state, Clinton has made dozens of paid appearances across the country at industry conventions and Wall Street banks as well as at universities. Her UCLA fee, like those at other universities, went to the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation, the family’s nonprofit group.

But critics have argued that the carefully staged events and high speaking fees could complicate Clinton’s ability to run a populist campaign built around the economic struggles of the middle class.

Versions of Clinton’s standard speaking contracts have surfaced publicly this year — including her luxury travel requirements — but the contracts do not contain the extensive detail seen in the UCLA communications.

It is unclear how personally involved Clinton was in the UCLA negotiations and whether the requests from her agency were being directed by her or merely from underlings anticipating her preferences. A Clinton spokesman declined to comment on the speaking arrangements.

It is commonplace for celebrity speakers to request special accommodations — and Clinton was no exception. Her representatives asked for a case of still water, room temperature, to be deposited stage right. They also asked that “a carafe of warm/hot water, coffee cup and saucer, pitcher of room temperature water, water glass, and lemon wedges” be situated both on a table on stage as well as in another room where Clinton would stand for photos with VIPs.

For the green room, Clinton’s representatives requested: “Coffee, tea, room temp sparkling and still water, diet ginger ale, crudité, hummus and sliced fruit.” They also asked for a computer, mouse and printer, as well as a scanner, which the university had to purchase for the occasion.

When university officials decided to award Clinton the UCLA Medal, Clinton’s team asked that it be presented to her in a box rather than draped around her neck. That request was sent to the university’s chancellor, Gene Block.

“Chancellor Block has agreed to accommodate Hillary Clinton’s request to have the medal presented in a box,” Assistant Provost Margaret Leal-Sotelo wrote in one e-mail.

Lippert replied: “I can either have the jewelers box open or closed, in case the Chancellor doesn’t want to risk opening it.” By contract, Clinton’s approval was needed for any promotional materials. Clinton gave permission for the university to record the event, but “for archival purposes only.”

For public distribution, Clinton’s speaking agency approved only a two-minute highlight video to upload to YouTube. “Please make sure it is available only for one (1) year from the date of posting,” a Harry Walker Agency official added.

Clinton posed for individual photos with 100 VIPS, or 50 couples — “We get a total of 50 clicks,” one university official explained — as well as two group photos. Lippert wrote to colleagues that Clinton’s representatives wanted the group shots “prestaged,” with participants assembled and ready to take the photographs before Clinton arrived “so the secretary isn’t waiting for these folks to get their act together.” Reiterating the request, Lippert added, “She doesn’t like to stand around waiting for people.”

Like many major universities, UCLA regularly pays high-profile speakers to visit campus. Many of the visits are funded through a private endowment and not with tuition or public dollars. Clinton’s appearance was privately funded as part of a lecture series endowed by Meyer Luskin, an investor and president of Scope Industries, a food waste recycling company.

9 posted on 10/21/2016 6:56:46 AM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
Yeah, that's a lot like the difference in "Livingston" and "Livingstone".

It's not a trivial thing. It helps a great deal to get things like that right.

10 posted on 10/21/2016 6:57:51 AM PDT by OKSooner (She was practiced at the art of deception, I could tell by her bloodstained hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I unintentionally misrepresented what the Sheriff asked for.

You didn't unintentionally misrepresent anything. You lied.

11 posted on 10/21/2016 6:57:58 AM PDT by mykroar (Democrats in 2016: The party of genitalia, real or imagined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Why does the slug Malloy still have a job after lying?

Any federal tax dollars going to this “institution” should be stopped immediately.


12 posted on 10/21/2016 6:58:25 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Romans Nine

“As far as I know Sherrif Clarke is still a democrat.”

He is straying off the plantation. The Left can’t abide an uppity black. (Unless he’s uppity for their cause, then he’s the celebrated victim.)


13 posted on 10/21/2016 6:59:27 AM PDT by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

Dead trees make a dead forest.


14 posted on 10/21/2016 7:04:24 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Females DESTROYED America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Romans Nine

Wish there were more democrats AND republicans like sheriff Clarke...

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/07/26/sheriff-david-clarke-my-message-for-america-s-black-community-it-s-time-to-leave-democratic-party.html


15 posted on 10/21/2016 7:04:36 AM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“I’d rather entrust the government of the United States to the first 400 people listed in the Boston telephone directory than to the faculty of Harvard University.”

William F. Buckley, Jr.


16 posted on 10/21/2016 7:10:58 AM PDT by mewzilla (I'll vote for the first guy who promises to mail in his SOTU addresses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Ditto for New Haven.

Mewzilla


17 posted on 10/21/2016 7:11:43 AM PDT by mewzilla (I'll vote for the first guy who promises to mail in his SOTU addresses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Lie, cheat and steal.....by any means necessary. The USA has had a great ride, but we are being destroyed from within. Pray for our country.


18 posted on 10/21/2016 7:14:41 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Romans Nine

Because his parents were Dhimmicrat?
Because of his melanin content?

Why can’t he simply be a PATRIOT that takes his oath of office seriously?


19 posted on 10/21/2016 7:14:57 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

No alumnus should ever give this outfit a dime.


20 posted on 10/21/2016 7:15:17 AM PDT by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson