Posted on 10/18/2016 12:54:38 PM PDT by thefixisin
Drudge would not post unless it's credible
This one?
A WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING
from City of Light Studios PRO on September 18, 2016
From the producers of the Gabriel Award winning television series “SAINTS ALIVE!” on EWTN, comes “A WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING”, a new feature docudrama on Saul Alinsky, the father of community organizing and author of “Rules for Radicals”. The film is a lens into America’s cultural Marxism euphemistically called ‘progressivism.’
With all the radical transformations of America and its religious freedoms, politics, economy, education, healthcare, courts, media, cinema, music, art, architecture; the film will help Catholics and all Christians understand “how we’ve gotten to where we are today” and “what’s behind” the amorality, sexual revolution, political correctness, gender confusion that is destroying our families and culture.
This is no conspiracy theory! It’s the real story of Alinsky and his movement. It’s the classic teachings of the Church with insights from philosopher Dr. Alice von Hildebrand, Fr. Mitch Pacwa, S.J. (who as a Jesuit scholastic was trained in Alinskyian organizing), Fathers Glenn Sudano & Andrew Apostoli (co-founders with Fr. Benedict Groeschel of Franciscan Friars of the Renewal), Stephanie Block (who wrote the definitive 4 volume study of Alinskyian organizing). Actors play Alinsky, Popes St. John Paul II & Leo XIII, Blessed Jerzy Popieluszko & others.
Even “idiot women” know the enquirer isn’t much more than gossip.
I’m just saying it would have served the source better if the story had been offered to and vetted by, lets say, the New York Post or the Washington Times. My hunch is they couldn’t vet the story.
That said, may it create all the doubt it can ...
1 The Wall Street Journal 2,378,8271
2 The New York Times 1,865,318
3 USA Today 1,674,306
4 Los Angeles Times 653,868
5 National Enquirer 520,795
Yea, where is the ACTUAL video's of DNC operatives using what one person in the video called a "double blind" to keep it getting back to the DNC?? Drudge better start posting this stuff or he is dead to me.
“If this is the big one, Hillary can start measuring for the drapes in the Oval Office. Nobody cares about this sh*t in 2016.
N.o.b.o.d.y.”
Oh yeah? Trump and his 9 groper women were in the news for over a week. We’ll see what the MSM does with Hillary’s (and Bill’s) indiscretions.
Re-airing:
A WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING
10/18 at 3:30 PM ET; 10/27 at 3:00 AM ET; 10/28 at 10:30 PM ET; 10/29 at 5:00 PM ET; 11/04 at 1:00 PM ET; 11/06 at 2:30 PM ET
Even without videos, if some of the named people come forward and confirm the details of the story, that will be huge.
That’s a good sign. :-)
And you remember this? Wow! They really are an effective means of reaching certain groups of people!
:)
Yoo Hoo Everyone.......Troll, here......note screen name.....TangledUpInBlue.......fer sher u r, troll
“Enquirer” got it right on one Presidential “shoe-in”
candidate that was poised to seize the Presidency; just as
Hillary is poised to seize the Presidency. Who was it? His
mistress was Raille Hunter and he was caught right before
the election visiting his mistress and his new baby.
EDWARDS!! That’s it! JOHN EDWARDS!
FWIW: Here’s a list of Hillary’s Lesbian Lovers:
Dated April 15, 2015
http://blindgossip.com/?p=70684
N.o.b.o.d.y.
You obviously missed the last week of "Grab the P***y" news cycle.
I have never purchase an Enquirer before ... I’m buying this issue just to save (with my Baseball Cards and Comics)
Almost certainly garbage. Whatever happened to the last 2 huge stories that claimed Cruz was having affairs with women who were easily able to categorically deny it or the one where Cruz’ Dad supposedly had a hand in offing JFK.
Yes, yes, the Enquirer gets 1 in 10,000 right, but almost everything they print is just trash. And if it were true, the fact it is being reported in the National Enquirer means the rest of the media has license to utterly ignore it.
This would only be useful to us politically if she performed these acts without their consent. No one cares if she’s promiscuous, and bisexuality would probably just make her voters like her more since it’s so on trend.
Those appear to be actually true.
Go ahead, I would like to see the other 50!
More truth here than in the NYT or WashPo or Huffpo.
I really, really, really did not need that mental image. Dinner is ruined!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.