Posted on 10/11/2016 9:01:18 PM PDT by lafroste
As the U.S. elections draw nearer, the amount of bellicose rhetoric from politicians and key military commanders (in truth, “politicians” as well) has been increasing. The main focus of that rhetoric has been directed toward Russia, and is also “blathered” in the direction of China, North Korea, and Iran when it suits U.S. political interests. The problem is that all of it is not just talk: action has been taken, especially regarding Russia and the Syrian theatre of operations.
Within the past several weeks, the U.S. has bombed Syrian troops, killing 62 outside of Deor ez-Zor in airstrikes and then admitting to doing so “mistakenly.” The Russians responded by firing up a UN/coalition convoy almost immediately after. Russian naval artillery then took out a command post with approximately 30 “coalition” officers, some of them being Americans. The U.S. then made itself responsible (indirectly) for an attack on the Russian Embassy in Damascus, Syria: anti-Assad Islamic militants did the job, and these have support with funding and materials of the U.S.
(Excerpt) Read more at shtfplan.com ...
Source, please?
Source, please?
I have not lived thru the Cuban Missile Crisis. I don't know what it is like to live in a world with tensions so high that I have to stock up on food and water and wonder if I will be waking up tomorrow. In the movies it usually begins with a crisis somewhere, usually in the Middle East. I firmly believe the reason we are in Syria is to place a pipeline thru Syria to Europe in order to lessen Europe's dependence on Russia for oil and gas. Plus, it will have the benefit of reduced oil and gas income for Russia and hurt their economy.
I don't know what will happen. I have not seen any mention in the media about this Russian request for students to come home. I will begin to really worry once I hear that the Russian ambassador has left the US with all diplomatic relations broken off, evacuation of Moscow and other large cities underway, Russian subs along our coastlines and the detonation of a low-yield nuke somewhere in the Med or Middle East.
If that happens...God help us all.
That definitely is interesting. I wasn’t aware of that.
Sounds like they expect to be hit in the homeland and they expect to retaliate abroad.
The ONLY thing I trust this admin to do is to “miscalculate”.
I really don’t understand the dynamics of this HIGHLY confrontational undercurrent threatening to become an overcurrent between the US & Russia. What in bloody hell do whatever elements of the US gov’t in charge of this particular piece of Kabuki theater expect to gain?
And the Ozarks.
The globalists hate Putin because he wants Russia to have an independent set of policies both domestic and international. In most cases, his policies make more sense than our western policies nowadays.
Russia would only launch nukes at North America and western Europe if they detected a credible threat of invasion of their territory on a large scale. A few special ops people in a border area wouldn’t trigger it.
Therefore we can only expect a nuclear war if NATO invades Russia. It would be foolish and suicidal to do this, and there is no obvious pretext for it. If the globalists behind the scenes decide the next step is to bunker down for ten years and outlive a radiation storm, then they will try to precipitate this war.
As some have said already, this sounds irrational at first hearing, but these are evil people with a long-term agenda for world domination. Their real reason for destabilizing the Middle East and provoking the refugee stream is to place greater stress on the fabric of our societies so that more authoritarian rule can be justified. They also figure it will swing the balance of power as the grateful refugees vote for the parties that let them in.
We have no rational reason to be enemies with Russia. I am not a big fan of Putin, I think some of his methods are crude and that he can’t always be trusted. But at the same time, he has decided to stay out of the globalist death march to oblivion and that makes him considerably smarter than our leaders. We should hope that Trump is elected and that these two men can forge a better understanding (which will include some limits, Putin should not think he can exploit the situation).
As for the globalists, the more senior of them are a law unto themselves and I think any reasonable legal analysis will show that they are committing treason. They are trying to govern our countries for their own personal gain, and whitewashing it with issues that justify their intervention such as the phoney climate change scare.
I have no idea, and that fact has been an obstacle to me seeing war with Russia as a possibility for a long time. The American people don't gain anything, and could lose a whole lot. Strategically I don't see that the US gains much, they are no longer a superpower.
And with nothing to gain, at least from my perspective, I keep thinking that these incidents that are building up are accidents, or Russia provoking us, or something. Because as cynical as I am about politics, it just seems crazy to take the leap and believe that our government is risking a war with a nuclear power, even trying to provoke it. Yet when I look really really deep, it seems to be the US provoking Russia, not the other way around. And we have been doing it since the Bush administration.
Add Atlanta, Denver, Seattle, Houston, Tampa and Vegas. And a bunch more up and down the east and west coast.
Leave Minneapolis alone, OK? I still live in Minnesota.
Right. A no-fly zone once again means that we do nothing and Russia flies on and over...
https://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2015/03/17/the-truth-about-the-conflict-with-russia/
Being as unhistorically unpolitical about that part of the world as I am, is there anyone who can shed light on it, in relation to the ZH piece? Any comments would be appreciated.
I stopped reading at the second paragraph:
The current conflict between the US and Russia is due to one simple reason: the Ashkenazim. They have a debt to settle with Russia.
They are obviously swine with an agenda decent, sane people will not share.
Syria is a sovereign country. They did not invite us, but they did Russia.
Russia is destroying ISIS/Al-Aquaeda. I’m okay with this. Let Russia sacrifice their own pilots.
Why are you so eager to want to go to war with Syria and Russia? You do understand it would lead to a wider and more spread war. Furthermore, we are over 20 Trillion in debt.
You do realize that Russia has nuclear subs sitting off our coasts?
When did Congress EVER vote on whether or not to send troops to Syria? Did we declare war on Assad?
BREAKING NEWS: RT NEWS
RUSSIAN PARLIAMENT APPROVES AIRBASE TO BE STATIONED IN SYRIA:
RT NEWS
BREAKING NEWS: RT NEWS
RUSSIAN PARLIAMENT APPROVES AIRFORCE (CORRECTED), TO BE STATIONED IN SYRIA:
RT NEWS
I always felt if the Cubs were one strike away from winning the Series is when the asteroid when hit and the game never completed. I guess this would do the trick too
Note how the MSM “fighting for you” is keeping you informed? Hell, I’m betting even the bastards in government don’t even bother turning on the air raid sirens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.