Skip to comments.HIIO: You Hack It, We’ll Flak it
Posted on 10/02/2016 6:09:20 AM PDT by NOBO2012
Well, its October, here come the surprises:
Surprise #1. Trump Tax Records Obtained by The Times Reveal He Could Have Avoided Paying Taxes for Nearly Two Decades
Note the use of the word obtained not modified by the adverb illegally, probably because thats the only way they could have obtained them. So just as scientists begin to question the existence of dark matter (more on that at a later date) here we have definitive proof of its existence. At the same time we have evidence of what many of us non-scientists have long suspected: the IRS has been weaponized for use against the Deplorables. Prepare to locate a tax shelter.
By the NYTs own admission there is absolutely no evidence that Trump did anything wrong, i.e. lie to federal officials, illegally deleted emails, or did anything contrary to IRS code like funneling income through a charitable trust. Nevertheless they have judged him to be morally deficient.
Using that standard, I suppose we can also obtain Hillarys emails regarding Benghazi by any means necessary oh wait: no we cant; she had them Bleach-bit out of existence. Well shoot. I guess we may as well get back to Trumps 3:00 am Tweets in that case.
By the way, I may have solved The Donalds late-night Tweeting habitué: Ive asked Eric Trump to change his password without telling him. If that doesnt work Ill contact our people at Twitter and have his account suspended for TOS violations (Tweets of Stupidity).
Anyway, if the NYT can extrapolate 18 years of tax payments from 3 pages of Trumps purloined state tax filings, I think I should be able to extrapolate 8 hours of illegal, unethical and morally reprehensible behavior on Hillarys part towards our Libyan Ambassador and his attachés from her 15,000 deleted emails. Or maybe Julian Assange will save me the trouble by releasing October surprise #2 on Tuesday.
After all, it is harvest season.
HIIO: You Hack It, Well Flak it
Posted from: Michelle Obamas Mirror
The NYT’s headline says “Could.” If he made a billion the next year, he would have paid taxes. So no basis in fact, just speculation. And the Times uses speculation to make Trump appear to have not paid taxes. A smear.
I don't know anyone who would ever want to do THAT.
So...which is worse, legally avoiding taxes, or stealing furnishings from the White House?
A Net Operating Loss deduction was the worst they could find on his return?
What a nothing burger!
Gee—Who was President in 1995?
Some twerp named Clinton, if memory serves.
Hillary’s speaking fees are the result of theft from the Goldman Sacks investor.
Might as well have been: "Tax Laws Allow Businesses to Declare Losses as Well as Gains - Legally".
Hypocrisy is the tribute evil pays to virtue.
Unless there is a Constitutional Revolution, the Republic is lost. People like Hillary have no place among the free and the brave.
Anyone who has ever proposed a sin tax on liquor or cigarettes understands the concept that "the power to tax is the power to destroy.
People who do not understand that income taxation destroys - or at least changes the form of - the income which is taxed are either disingenuous or naive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.