Posted on 08/21/2016 7:47:37 PM PDT by pboyington
It’s been a summer of good sports: the Tour de France, the Rio Olympics, baseball, and now within weeks, the beginning of the football season.
Professional and amateur sports are obviously not coed. Why aren’t women competing with men in the track and field events at the Rio Olympics? Because men can run faster than women. Why aren’t women competing with men in the Tour de France? Because men are stronger and have more aerobic lung capacity. Why aren’t women intercepting a pass in the NFL? Because women don’t have the muscle mass and upper body strength to last five minutes in the NFL.
So, let’s get this straight…
No women compete in the Tour de France.
No women compete in the NFL.
No women are teeing off with Jordan Spieth in the Masters.
No woman play in the NHL.
No women play on Major League Baseball teams.
Yet, women will now be allowed in the Green Berets, the Navy SEALs, the infantry, the cavalry, the artillery, the Rangers, Marine Recon and Delta Force.
Professional sports have a profit motive and bring in a fortune every year. Do you really think the owners of the Dallas Cowboys are going to start a woman as QB just so they can show how sensitive, progressive and PC they are? Of course not! First of all there would be outrage that a woman would be subjected to physical destruction on a football field. Secondly, the Cowboys would lose millions in revenue after fans refused to buy tickets. The networks would lose millions when people turned the dial from Sunday football to reruns of Mannix.
The same could be said for every other sport I’ve mentioned. Granted, golfers aren’t body slamming each other to the ground, but lady golfers no matter how talented or cute they are, just can’t compete with the Men’s PGA tour. The networks aren’t salivating over the Marriot Ladies PGA Tournament. They salivate over the Masters, the US Open, the British Open because the best golfers in the world are there and the best golfers in the world bring in millions on TV and the best golfers in the world are men.
So, let that sink in for a second. No woman is allowed to tee off with Dustin Johnson at the US Open, yet women are now allowed in the toughest units of the US military, the combat arms and special operations; jobs that require an incredible amount of physical exertion, upper body strength, endurance, aggressiveness and the killer instinct that nature has given men, along with the physical prowess only young men possess.
Why isn’t there outrage in the country over the fact that our nation’s young women are going to be subjected to the horrors of ground combat and the rigors of life in a combat arms or special ops unit, which turns strutting 22 year old men into geezers in a decade.
Why isn’t there outrage in the country that our nation’s young women are going to be maimed and butchered in future conflicts?
Do the people of America have any idea what the young men of this nation have endured in our wars? Speak with a survivor of Iwo Jima, Omaha Beach, the Frozen Chosin’, Khe Sanh or Fallujah and ask them if they want our nation’s sisters, daughters and mothers exposed to the nightmare world of a battlefield.
Do the members of Congress even care what happens to our nation’s young women? Furthermore, why are they willing to let aviators like Martha McSally become the experts on the inclusion of women in the infantry or the Green Berets?
The generals know the real story, as most of them are combat vets, but they are too spineless to take a stand as USDW has indicated in a myriad of articles.
Since the dawn of time, men have defended their nations and fought wars. While technology has evolved, the simple mission of the combat arms has remained steadfast. Their mission is to seize and hold ground and to annihilate the enemy swiftly and violently. The combat arms have no other mission but that. What has changed in the DNA of mankind to suggest that women will now somehow be able to survive on a battlefield?
The answer, obviously, is nothing has changed in the DNA of mankind. What has changed is the effect of militant feminism on society. What has changed is the absolute spinelessness of the US military’s leaders in allowing this insidious insanity to be instituted.
Feminism, like socialism is nothing but death: death for the family, for women, for masculinity, for society, for freedom, for the future of mankind. It is evil incarnate and as heinous a philosophy as fascism or communism. It belongs at the bottom of a very deep sewer.
Feminism is now in the process of destroying the US military as no enemy of this great nation ever could. If the current policies are allowed to continue, feminism will be responsible for the demise of the US military in a future war and the fall of the Republic.
Feminism has created a whole generation of women who have literally been brainwashed by Hollywood, leftist K-12 teachers and card carrying communist instructors who lecture at Women’s Studies classes in the nation’s universities. Many American women now believe they are physical equals of men, no matter what history and science tells them. It is a mindset that teeters on delusion.
On the other side of the spectrum, the nation’s young men are the feminized products of a whole generation of the War on Boys by school administrators, the absence of male role models as coaches and teachers and a feminist driven society that portrays men as indecisive wallflowers who parade around in capris and crocs.
While a loss in sports may result in a loss of money for a team, a TV network or individual players, it does not mean the death of soldiers, Marines, the US armed forces and the nation itself.
We are now at the point where we need a gigantic reality check as a nation. We must finally ask ourselves if we are willing to send the US military to its death in a future war, in order to placate cultural Marxists, feminists, liberal imbeciles and gutless generals.
Will common sense finally win the day in America, or will we march to our deaths like zombies, led by feminist executioners? Will America be nothing more than a chapter in world history, where future historians explain how the greatest nation on God’s earth was destroyed?
Time will tell…
The ONLY way a female will be a Navy SEAL is if they lower the standards to almost nothing and then let her slide through. Sorry, but that’s just the way it is.
There are physical limitations women cannot overcome.
That can’t be right. I saw “GI Jane” once.
Sucker
I thought Demi Moore was the first ——— So soon we forget!
Diversity is Our StrengthTM
(I hope a sarcasm tag isn't necessary.)
“Women have ruined more men than wars and pestilence.” - Author Unknown
Now it seems that the quote has to be altered:
“Women have ruined more men than wars, pestilence and a nation.”
I couldn't have said it better. I had an argument last week with one of my adult daughters. All because I told my granddaughter to be selective in what she pursues and does when she grows up. My daughter argued that her child can be whatever she wants to be. I said that is being unrealistic, and the facts say otherwise. That she's cruising for a bruising if she doesn't know her limitations. I backed away from the argument, saying facts are facts and females can be illogical (that didn't go over well).
Anyway, I've had similar conversations with women in the past, for instance thinking they could defend themselves in a one-on-one fight against a male attacker, despite the woman being 5 foot and 100 pounds (without any martial arts training) going up against a 6 foot and 250 pounds male. Logic dictates otherwise, unless the female has been specially trained. These were female friends who were mild mannered without any fighting skills at all. Women have been brainwashed, and movies reinforce that delusion. I know for a fact that women don't have comparable upper body strength equivalent to that of a man, mostly based on moving furniture and equipment. Maybe I sound chauvinistic, but I just don't want to see women get hurt unnecessarily.
I see it all the time as a golfer. Young women strut around like they’re the second coming of Ben Hogan. Some are okay at the sport, many aren’t good. On the other side, many young guys seem to have no muscular strength and guys 50 plus can crush a ball a lot farther.
you must be a homosexual or a stone age muzzie...
but I'll bet on the homosexuality..
Can we also add to the discussion how Blacks cannot be racist... maybe this falls into the same PC-science.
but I'll bet on the homosexuality..
WTF wars have YOU fought in?
I fought in Vietnam and lived.
You?
We don't need any social "experiments" to show how "diverse" we are.
The man is right!
I'll admit that there are exceptions to a rule. But the fact is that on average, males are stronger then females when it comes to muscles. In my younger days at work I used to play baseball on department teams. There were some women who could knock the ball out of the park farther and higher than the guys. Amazon ladies do exist! Us guys would just gawk in amusement as those ladies ran the bases for their home runs. But they are the exception, not the rule. Same goes for guys; there are a lot of weakling young guys but there are also a lot of tough strong guys who balance out the stats. Being over 50 and strong is impressive, as many people let themselves go as they age.
“you must be a homosexual or a stone age muzzie...
but I’ll bet on the homosexuality..”
I had to stop laughing before I could type a response and I’m still laughing!
ROFL
Viet vet also. However, I cannot go into the details. Well, I suppose that I could but then I would have to kill you! ;-)
Just reporting the quote, nothing more!
It seems I should have put one on Post #4.
Also once standards are lowered so that Little Suzzie can qualify for any unit that Little Johnny can qualify for it will be time to make the move to have 18 year old girls register for the draft. And believe me any nation that would draft it's young women into combat is not a nation worth fighting for.
DITTO!!! I've got one granddaughter. She's a H.S. senior this year. She's a perfect little lady and not a phonyass, baseball hat wearing "tomboy". She has no business being in the military.
This effort to integrate women into combat is IMHO really an effort to make the nation unwilling to go to war and unable to win should it be forced into a war. Anyone pushing the idea that woman should be allowed into combat arms is an enemy of the USA. That goes for those that support open homosexuals in our military too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.