Just In: Wikileaks Issues A Formal Statement On Murder Of DNC Staffer Seth Rich

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/763565863861616640 ^ | 8/10/2016

[BlackFemaleArmyColonel]

Just In: Wikileaks Issues A Formal Statement On Murder Of DNC Staffer Seth Rich.

[TigersEye]

Like I said, it doesn’t have to happen now. It could be months after the election. And it doesn’t need to be parents or other family. In fact that wouldn’t make sense. Plugging leaks by dealing with co-workers or friends would though.

Not sure why you think they’d be so circumspect after Vince Foster, Ron Brown and dozens of other sloppy murders with obvious motives. There was never much press and no consequences for those.

[Talisker]

...corrupt, statist, vicious insider government lesbian grandmothers...

Fair warning, I'm stealing that...

[BeadCounter]

Pictures of Rich always show him drinking beer, going to a ball game, being in a bar, he looks like he was a partyer and I’m sure a nice guy... but would he have the know-how to pull this off? Dump emails, I have questions. But someone sure did.

[MNDude]

He said from the beginning, their policy is to never affirm or deny their sources.

[moehoward]

“No, he DIDN’T punk out - he assured his sources they will not be exposed.

At the same time, he made it obvious Rich was a source without directly saying so. “

Exactly.

[TigersEye]

It makes perfect sense that the policy applies to sources and those who are not sources. If he started issuing denials for those who truly were not sources it would quickly become apparent who the real sources were. The policy doesn’t work any other way.

[right way right]

Well yeah, Assange would like to get immunity to come and testify.
He’s kind of the arch villan to the whole uniparty so, I don’t think it will happen.

[Major Matt Mason]

Your Democrats friends might not, but independent voters are a different story. Something like this could damage the party for years to come, which would be a good thing, of course.

[dragnet2]

Show me an event even remotely involving the Clinton where a close player/associate showed up dead and a week or two later so did the decedents family? Just guessing but to cause that level of screaming, glaring attention would not be a smart move in these circles.

Then again, who knows.☺

[Fungi]

What questions? Please name them and be specific.

[PGR88]

Vicious grandmother

Corrupt statist lesbian

She killed Vince Foster

Corrupt Lesbian

Grasping power-hungry witch

killed Seth Rich. Dead!

[TigersEye]

Show me an event even remotely involving the Clinton where a close player/associate showed up dead and a week or two later so did the decedents family?

I can show you three posts where I said the hurt could come later. Duhhhhhhhh

[dragnet2]

*Where do ya get that?

*Did ya miss the part about Wikileaks decimating the entire Democratic Convention and causing it’s DNC Chairwoman to resign in public disgrace on the eve of their big convention?

[dragnet2]

I see, they won’t kill his family as you initially implied, they’ll just hurt them. Got it!

[TigersEye]

Or kill them. I didn’t rule that out.

[Rusty0604]

That’s what I get from it.

[Fungi]

Rosanna Rosannadanna: never mind. We are not on the same page.

[TigersEye]

I see, they won’t kill his family as you initially implied, they’ll just hurt them. Got it!

FWIW you utterly twisted the meaning of my statement that went...

I can show you three posts where I said the hurt could come later.

It had nothing to do with how they might be hurt. Reading comprehension a problem for you?

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

Bingo.

[Rusty0604]

So why do you think only he should reveal his sources? Think about it.