Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Yorkers seek court order to keep Cruz off the ballot in state Republican presidential primaries
The New York Daily News ^ | February 18, 2016 | Barbara Ross

Posted on 02/18/2016 2:38:43 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Donald Trump's threatened to sue Ted Cruz to keep him off the ballot because of his Canadian roots -- but two New Yorkers have beat him to the punch.

The pair filed papers in Manhattan Supreme Court Thursday asking the court to order Cruz off the ballot in the the New York State Republican Presidential primaries, arguing he's ineligible to run because he was born in Canada.

Cruz has insisted that he is qualified to be President because any child born abroad to an American citizen gets American citizenship automatically.

When Cruz was born in Canada in 1970, his mother was an American citizen. She was born in Wilmington, Delaware. His father was a native of Cuba who became a citizen of Canada after Cruz was born.

In court papers, Barry Korman and William Gallo say Cruz "has publicly admitted that he was born in Canada" and New York State election law says "a person shall not be designated or nominated for a public office or party position who is ... ineligible to be elected to such office or position or ... meet the constitutional or statutory qualifications."

They point out that Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution says "no person except a natural born Citizen or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Therefore, they contend, Cruz is "constitutionally ineligible" to become President.

Cruz maintains he is a "natural born" citizen, because his mom was a citizen.

The action against the NYS Board of Elections was filed by Manhattan attorney Roger Bernstein.

New York's Presidential primaries are April 19.

Cruz is facing similar challenges in at least two other states.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: alexjones; birthers; canada; canadian; cruz; cuba; cuban; naturalborncanadian; naturalbornsubject; newyork; tedcruz; tinfoilhat; truthers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Let them waste their money.


21 posted on 02/18/2016 3:01:39 PM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Excellent point.


22 posted on 02/18/2016 3:02:44 PM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

Legal arguments do not have to make sense to you, but actully you are correct that a child born of an American over seas that does not have to be naturalized is by that fact a citizen at birth and there fore a natural born citizen. Unless you want to claim that C-sections do not count or some other notion.

* C-section was for humor it has been most lacking about FR of late.


23 posted on 02/18/2016 3:04:14 PM PST by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wait, check these guys donation history. If they run a NY business they’ll have donated to leftists!


24 posted on 02/18/2016 3:05:58 PM PST by RginTN (Donald J Trump- why would the people of Ky want a rookie senator when they have Sen Mitch Mcconnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st

Those new york values evidently


25 posted on 02/18/2016 3:07:05 PM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><> GO CRUZ!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st
It's about time!

It is quite bizarre that we do not know for sure who is eligible to be the President. I can't imagine why Cruz didn't strive for clarity before the campaign started.

Other pieces in the puzzle. Have we ever seen Cruz's birth certificate? Did he register for the US draft? Have we seen the certificate issued saying he is a US citizen?

26 posted on 02/18/2016 3:09:06 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

In November NY is going to vote for the most socialist candidate, so the primary my not even be relevant.


27 posted on 02/18/2016 3:10:12 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Barry Korman and William Gallo? And what are their ties to Trump?


28 posted on 02/18/2016 3:10:32 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Hmmmmm, seems to be a pattern there. Trump and associates.


29 posted on 02/18/2016 3:11:37 PM PST by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

I see Trump elated. That will enable the 2 strongest branches of anti-establishmentism to unite.


30 posted on 02/18/2016 3:11:56 PM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yawn.


31 posted on 02/18/2016 3:13:16 PM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“EXCLUSIVE” allegiance to the United States from birth. Cruz does not meet this most vital requirement of citizenship that is embedded in A1 & A2 of the US Constitution, ‘subject to the “exclusive” jurisdiction of the United States’, either at birth or upon naturalization.

And this requirement of “exclusive” allegiance via “subject to the “exclusive” jurisdiction of the United States, including political jurisdiction” was upheld in Congressional hearings in 2000 when hearings were held on an amendment to the Constitution that was brought by Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts. Lengthy hearings, with witnesses from both sides of the argument and Congress denied the change to the Constitution. Then again in 2004, same situation, only this time, the coauthors of the bill were Republicans and Democrats trying to remove that pesky “exclusive” clause that stands in their way of finally destroying what is left of the US Constitution. “Citizenship” is the sacred thread that binds a society and secures borders for their posterity, for all future generations; once that is destroyed (dumbed down), they can now have their utopian global society.

well, if what you are dreaming of is a global utopia, then Cruz definitely is your man, Constitution be damned!

32 posted on 02/18/2016 3:19:17 PM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is - 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Department of Justice website October 2015.  photo image_zpsdqyzykjp.jpeg
33 posted on 02/18/2016 3:19:27 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
I think these parties have standing. They put their case before the election commission, the case was decided "on the merits" with the election commission saying its only duty is to make sure every space in the forms is filled out. The forms are filled out correctly, and the objectors are appealing the decision to the next level.

For those who don't know, in NY, the "Supreme" court is the LOWEST court. It is a trial court, not even an appellate court.

34 posted on 02/18/2016 3:20:33 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They already tried this in Illinois, and got shot down. Also, if they are going to deny Cruz, then they will also have to deny the GOPe darling Rubio, so I doubt this will come to anything.


35 posted on 02/18/2016 3:20:38 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Do you mean Barack Hussein Obama’s Department of Justice? Hahahahaha!


36 posted on 02/18/2016 3:21:28 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

The ill ruling ignored original intent. Most conservatives know what a Natural born us citizen literally means.... Now does not Obama hail from ill... You think ill cares about original intent of the Constitution? Cruz sure does not.


37 posted on 02/18/2016 3:21:34 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
I don't think so

What you think is irrelevant. What I think is also irrelevant. What is relevant are the current laws. And yes, millions of babies that you describe are, under current law, US citizens at birth and NBCs.

38 posted on 02/18/2016 3:24:08 PM PST by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: patlin
 photo image_zpsaskzh0nx.jpeg
39 posted on 02/18/2016 3:24:45 PM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Sorry, that is not the current law. The current law is found in USC Title 8 section 1401.


40 posted on 02/18/2016 3:26:07 PM PST by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson