Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most disturbing impact of SCOTUS rulings: They’ve made the federal government the 51st state
Canada Free Press ^ | 06/29/15 | Herman Cain

Posted on 06/29/2015 10:12:21 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

Trashing the Tenth Amendment.

Let’s refresh our memories about exactly what the Tenth Amendment says:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

That is not ambiguous. If the Constitution doesn’t expressly grant the federal government a power or expressly prohibit the states from exercising that same power, then the states and not the federal government have that power. But in both the ObamaCare ruling and the gay marriage ruling last week, the Supreme Court ruled as if the Tenth Amendment did not exist. In essence, by ruling as it did in both cases, it essentially established the federal government as the 51st state - and let there be no doubt, as a more-equal-than-all-others 51st state.

First let’s consider the ObamaCare ruling. Even though the statute says subsidies are only available to those who bought their policies on exchanges “established by the State,” the majority ruled that the federal government can still subsidize those who bought on the federal exchange - because ObamaCare doesn’t work if they can’t. (In other words, the Democrats wrote a law that doesn’t work so the Supremes once again rewrote it in an attempt to make it work.) What they decided, in essence, is that the federal government is a state. That is the only way to square the statutory language with the Court’s ruling.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; constitution; deathpanels; homosexualagenda; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; obamacare; obamanation; scotus; tenthamendment; zerocare

1 posted on 06/29/2015 10:12:21 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Et tu, Roberts?


2 posted on 06/29/2015 10:14:17 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Not 51st state.

LotR: 50 rings created, then The One State to rule them all.


3 posted on 06/29/2015 10:14:46 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

No, there’s just one state. And one government. States are just for tourist ads. The rest of us are closer to serfs than to citizens.


4 posted on 06/29/2015 10:16:12 AM PDT by cvq3842 (Thanks for all responses, and flames, in advance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

It all started w the war of northern aggression. Slavery was legal just like abortion is today and the union was split over states rights. The rest is history


5 posted on 06/29/2015 10:17:00 AM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

51st state?

Clearly, some states are more equal than others.


6 posted on 06/29/2015 10:19:29 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Henry Bowman where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony; All
Note that state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified, in terms of the 10th Amendment nonetheless, that power which the states haven’t delegated to the feds expressly via the Constitution are prohibited to the feds.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.

7 posted on 06/29/2015 10:19:34 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

No. Others have stated it and so I won’t belabor the point, but this isn’t one among equals, this is One State To Rule Them All.


8 posted on 06/29/2015 10:22:05 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony; All

Note that as a consequnece of the ill-conceived 17th Amendment that the corrupt Senate is approving pro-unconstitutionally big federal government activist justices to the Supreme Court instead of state sovereignty-respecting justices.

The 17th Amendment needs to disappear and corrupt senators and anti-state sovereignty activist justices along with it.


9 posted on 06/29/2015 10:24:26 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Disagree. The U.S. is now one socialist state.


10 posted on 06/29/2015 10:31:51 AM PDT by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Union of American Socialist Republics


11 posted on 06/29/2015 10:37:59 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Senators were intended to represent their states. When they do not, they are no longer relevant.


12 posted on 06/29/2015 10:38:52 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

I wouldn’t phrase it that way. They have made the federal government the super-state. Individual states are just an obstacle to the super-state. They just waste time and money.

The superior portions of the super-state are:

1. The Judiciary
2. The Executive.

The federal legislature is just a farce to give the people of the states some sense that they can affect outcomes. They can’t. But it forestalls a revolution of the people.


13 posted on 06/29/2015 10:39:36 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
James Madison, the Author of Federalist 45, "The Alleged Danger From the Powers of the Union to the State Governments Considered", in The Federalist Papers would not approve.

The idea that the reach of the federal government would be restricted to a few enumerated powers is articulated by Madison in Federalist No. 45:

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite.”

14 posted on 06/29/2015 11:10:46 AM PDT by GregoTX (Remember the Alamo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Once again, the tenth Amendment is ignored. The Bill of Rights is ignored. The Constitution is ignored. Ours is a lawless Federal Government. At what point do we conclude that our national government is illegitimate?


15 posted on 06/29/2015 1:03:42 PM PDT by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
Most disturbing impact of SCOTUS rulings: They’ve made the federal government the 51st state: They’ve made the federal government the 51st state

And they just made Mexico the 52nd, Guatemala the 53rd, etc etc.

Fork. Stuck. Done.

16 posted on 06/29/2015 1:45:14 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson