Posted on 06/08/2015 3:12:42 PM PDT by John Semmens
Contending that it is shameful that we allow each state to determine its own qualifications for voters, Attorney General Loretta Lynch has proposed new rules that would concentrate all authority over elections under the jurisdiction of her US Department of Justice.
I know that the Constitution gave states the right to run their own elections, but it also gave Congress the right to alter state regulations if it so chooses, Lynch pointed out. Lynch said she is especially aggrieved that states get to determine who is and isnt mentally competent to cast a ballot. By what right does any state presume to deny the right to vote based on a contention that a person is too demented? Does a person lose his civil right to participate in selecting who will govern him just because he cant understand the issues or his choices? This seems to be a clear violation of the American with Disabilities Act.
Lynch asserted that anyone who wants to vote should be allowed to vote. If that person needs help filling out a ballot, well, thats what we pay social workers for. The legislation I am proposing would permit these trained professionals to assist and, if necessary act as a proxy for those in their care, to cast ballots in any election.
Whether Lynchs bill will gain much traction in the Republican-controlled Congress seems dubious. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) expressed skepticism that ensuring the mentally incompetents access to the ballot box would improve election outcomes. I think the idea of self-government presumes that voters can act rationally. I dont think it means that we trust social workers to cast ballots on behalf of those unable to comprehend the process.
The AG says she doesnt view Congressional opposition as an insuperable obstacle. Drafting a bill is merely a courtesy, Lynch declared. Were giving them an opportunity to be part of the process. If they fail to grasp this opportunity the President is prepared to proceed on his own authority as the nations Commander-in-Chief.
In related news, candidate for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination Hillary Clinton called for the end of all restrictions on voting. A person should be able to vote whenever and wherever they want. Rules requiring registration, or short time frames when ballots may be cast, or limited locations where ballots may be cast or accumulated lower participation rates. There ought to be a free voter app on every cell phone the government hands out.
if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...
http://azconservative.org/2015/06/07/new-candidate-for-president-vows-to-complete-metric-conversion/
And that sums up the Obama administration.
Good job, John.
What matters is who counts the votes.
- Josef Stalin
Another jackass appointee, who
abides with criminality.
This is from The Onion?
It cannot be real.
Voter ID will be part of the plan right?
Voter ID will be part of the plan right?
If you mean Sigmund Freud’s “id,” yes.
If you mean that voters would be required to prove their identity and eligibility, no.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.