Posted on 12/08/2014 8:49:15 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
Well at least he didn’t say it was high taxes that killed him. LOL
I’m not mad. You insist on trying to make me agree on your perverted logic for a situation that is not based on race, IMO.
Simply because you assert “illogical” and “irrational” and “unprovable” does make it so.
Frankly, you lost this discussion when you started with condemnation and derision - something I never tried on you.
Just being concise...not trying to say anything about you. You should have taken it as such.
The problems police have is almost everyone who doesn’t want to be taken in will be saying things like, “I can’t breath”, “I’m innocent, so loosen my cuffs”, “You have the wrong person” and so forth.
Police have people crying wolf so often that they can’t always catch a real issue.
Obviously there was bad health and stupid decision making by Garner involved when he resisted arrest.
Since you don’t remember, here’s a refresher:
He was alive before the police grabbed him; he was dead afterwards. How hard is this to understand?
Post Hoc ergo Propter Hoc
Logical fallacy !
Now, go ahead and explain your illogical, irrational and unprovable position on this matter.
I guess now, you’ll next be calling me a newbie troll. Just go away.
No, I asked you to explain your illogical, irrational and unprovable position on this matter.
But I see that you CAN’T.
So you laughably try to put words in my mouth then tell me to go away.
I invite you again to go ahead and explain your position, please, convince me that your postion is the correct position.
You misunderstand and grab another FReeper’s lifeline that asserts some mistaken contention that ONE example of a similar instance gives rise to “all laws are unjust” is patently absurd. I never said anything of the sort. Just quit. You and I don’t agree. I can accept that, why can’t you?
It’s not a lifeline.
It’s demonstable proof that your assertion is false.
I have asked you to explain how your position is correct, and you refuse.
“He was alive before the police grabbed him; he was dead afterwards. How hard is this to understand?”
This above is what is absurd, your postion, and you question my ability to understand, when in fact it is obviously your ability to understand that is questionable.
What I can accept is that you are wrong on the matter.
Flat.
Out.
Wrong.
Just keep that lifeline and keep thinking that. Maybe you could emphasis your points with punctuation for dramatic effect. Done here, dude.
Yes, you are.
Checkmate.
Pathetic isn't it? Way too many on the right run around in circles about race.
Geez. I had an ex-wife that stuck to idiocy like you do. Fortunately she and I reconciled and don’t pull your kind of stubbornness any more. Be confident in your convincing me that I’m wasting my time with your. Much more than I care to. You win, dude. Be happy with it.
I’m happy that justice and fact won over irrational emotion.
A man who did not deserve to face trial for a crime he did not committ is not going to be facing a trial for such.
Justice in a unjust world is a good thing.
This idiot can’t tell the difference between the two cases. He is a moron of the highest degree. And he is also the real racist.
Nonsense.
Eric Garner was killed because he was threatening NYC’s steady flow of tax revenue.
The man was killed over a small amount of tax monies.
Emphasize
Yeah "period", as in no need to respond to the error in your post, right?
Garner was out on bail for one(or more than one) of his previous 30 arrests. Usually when one breaks the law while being out on bail, the person is subject to more than a citation. The person is subject to an arrest and a revocation of bail.
Period.
Yes. Correct. Any relevant comment other than kibitzing? Mea Culpa...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.