Jackie Kennedy believed Lyndon Johnson killed JFK

Communities Digital News ^ | October 18, 2014 | Richard Cameron

[2ndDivisionVet]

It has been widely reported that Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, widow of President John F. Kennedy, shared with family members she was certain that Kennedy’s Vice President Lyndon Baines Johnson, arranged to have her husband murdered.

Soon that conclusion will be heard in the late First Lady’s own words, because audio tapes, recorded of discussions with historian and close family associate, Arthur Schlesinger Jr., between March and June 1964, will be released and excerpts featured on an upcoming ABC News program in November marking the 50th anniversary of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination in Dallas.

(VIDEO-AT-LINK)

The tapes, which insiders describe as featuring Ms. Kennedy’s disclosures of J.F.K.’s affairs and her romantic liaisons in retaliation, also reportedly reveal her conviction that L.B.J., with a cabal of associates and Texas businessmen, orchestrated the plot culminating in the Kennedy assassination. This is in contrast to the account of these interviews in Barbara Leaming’s biography of Ms.Kennedy, “The Winter of Her Despair”.

The establishment theory of the Kennedy assassination, arguably the most controversial event in American history, is dubbed the “lone gunman”. It is the conclusion of the Warren Report, commissioned by newly sworn in Lyndon Johnson and chaired by then Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Earl Warren.

It concludes that Kennedy was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald, a disturbed ex-Marine who had exhibited erratic actions and behavior and that Oswald shot the President from the 6th floor of the Dallas Book Depository building....

[thestob]

please don't anyone get caught up in people accusing George Hickey of discharging his rifle in the secret service car and accidentally killing jfk ...the theory has been debunked over and over with no witness ever saying they saw anything like this happen ....

#1.) Ken O'donnel and Dave Powers sitting less than a foot away from where Hickey would have discharged his weapon, and they didn't seem to notice that the guy in the car with them blew the presidents head off? or did they just decide to instantly plot a complex cover story for their closest friend's accidental murder and become a part of the largest cover up in American history to protect a bumbling, but astonishingly accurate secret service agent?

#2.) what about the Newman family? they were aligned with the front bumper of the secret service car at the time of the head shot, but they did not notice an ar-15 going off a few feet in front of their eyes? Didn't hear it? ...NO...they state, not 15 minutes later, and on live television that every shot came from behind them up on the "knoll"...so did someone from the secret service get to them and tell them to shut up? here is a link to their interview 15 minutes after the assassination: http://youtu.be/iC1ebqkXGTk

How about Charles Brehm who was directly across from the secret service follow up car and the closest street witness to George Hickey at the time of the head shot, would he not have noticed a rifle going off that close to him? would he have not seen it? look at the photo below that has a yellow arrow pointing to George Hickey, Charles Brehm is the man in the tan jacket no more than 10 ft from Hickey...he wouldn't have noticed the Hickey firing his rifle? come on now ...

photo is a frame from the Bronson film showing George Hickey at the time of the fatal headshot, it goes from normal to extreme blow up ..yellow arrow is pointing at Hickey....notice again Charles Brehm in the Tan jacket...here is first interview, just moments after the assassination http://youtu.be/S8Vk3WY1GBA and just look at all the people standing around the car, yet not one witness to this secret service man standing up high enough to clear the windshield and fire his weapon ...

[CodeToad]

It was done by Oswald who simply wanted to impress the commies. He spent years trying to get their attention and this opportunity dropped right in his lap.

[SuperLuminal]

If it talks like a demoncrat, votes like a demoncrat, runs as a demoncrat, gets elected as a demoncrat, and loves Karl M. as a demoncrat...murder (of humans both before and after birth)is a no-brainer, essential part of its ideology.

[CivilWarBrewing]

There was a lot of commotion following the first shot, fired by Oswald. And people's memories can be contaminated by bogus theories, etc.. I'm not sure the AR-15 head shot was intentional, most likely NOT. But in the moment when the driver of the chase car reacted, possibly hitting the brakes for a split second before speeding up, the AR-15 discharged and the round cleared the windshield probably by no more than a 1/2 inch headed for Kennedy's skull.. You have to admit that the exit wound is extremely violent as if from close range from an explosive round. This scenario fits PERFECTLY with what really happened. What would it take for the Secret Service to admit they killed Kennedy? No amount of money, pressure, guilt, or whatever would ever let that truth come out. The fact is, a Secret Service agent by the name of George Hickey held a loaded and chambered AR-15 in directly behind Kennedy's head. An AR-15 that Hickey had NO training with whatsoever.

Kennedy's fatal head wound was caused by an explosive round (hollow point) that caused his head to explode. Oswald's rifle was not carrying this type of round, nor would Kennedy's exit wound been facing Oswald had it been his weapon that struck Kennedy's skull.

[thestob]

there is no use arguing with you...the picture is right there, Hickey would have to shoot through 4 people and a windshield to fire his rifle ....you won’t see it ...and believe every person in the Secret Service, every witness, every police officer was within 15 minutes decided to involve themselves in the greatest cover up in human history ...

and finally a quote from Dave Powers when asked about “Mortal Error”——

“Someone a foot away from me or two feet away from me couldn’t fire a gun without me hearing it.”

[muir_redwoods]

LBJ was a miserable SOB capable of anything.

[zeugma]

I read something a long time ago that Kennedy wrote Executive Order 11110 which he signed in April of 1963. The central bank (FEDs) didn’t like that and had him killed. Although EO 11110 is still valid, the government shortly after Kennedy’s death removed all the money printed with “United States Note” while leaving Federal Reserve Notes in circulation. Google “Executive Order 11110” for more information.

From what I understand, countermanding that executive order was the first thing LBJ did once in office. The FED has always been my favored target in this particular conspiracy. When you look at big things happening in history, it always comes down to money in the end.

[BlackElk]

The cover story for assassination week in Time magazine was about Kennedy trailing Goldwater everywhere but New England and New York and New Jersey. The actual hard copy of that issue should be available at significant public or academic libraries.

[don-o]

That is a disgusting image.

[morphing libertarian]

how did the bullet get through the windshield of the SS car to get to kennedy. Isn’t the theory that the agent was pushed back by the car acceleration and he discharged the weapon as he was pushed into the seat?

[angryoldfatman]

...which then struck Kennedy in the back of his skull, exiting through the side/front...

No.

[CivilWarBrewing]

But what if one of Oswald’s shots (or echo) and the SS agent’s shot occurred at the same time?

[dfwgator]

BJ didn’t even seek a second elected term as President. Doesn’t sound like the kind of guy who wants it so bad he’d kill for it.

Maybe he found that the view from the top wasn't what he expected.

[morphing libertarian]

You don’t attribute any difference in thinking between the ambitious LBJ up to Nov 1963 and the LBJ of 1968 after the turmoil in the country over 3 major assassinations and Viet Nam.

Big difference.

[angryoldfatman]

“The idea that LBJ had anything to do with it is deep into 9/11 truther style territory. Utter nonsense.”

Don’t equate those two things, please.

The only thing they have in common is people telling us the video evidence isn’t what we saw with our own two eyes.

In the case of 9/11, that’s your thermite/holograms/missile crowd.

In the case of JFK, that’s the Dan Rather/Warren Commission/Vincent Bugliosi/Gerald Posner crowd.

[x]

Who did she think killed Marilyn, though?

[PIF]

I thought LBJ was aboard Airforce One at the time ...

[OldNewYork]

Maybe Lyndon Johnson also believed he killed JFK, or contributed to it by action or inaction. I think this is less and less likely to ever be settled for us here on earth as more and more of those involved pass on to their own divine judgement.

[Defiant]

If she had mentioned it publicly in 1964, she could have saved this country. Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society and Vietnam War did more to harm this country than anything since FDR’s New Deal.

[angryoldfatman]

Are there any honest biased free ballistics experts that
have refuted or disproved the single bullet theory.

~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~

True Scotsman fallacy.

As soon as anybody mentions one, you’ll say they’re not honest or “biased free”, thereby employing circular argumentation to avoid any opposing evidence.

Much the same way that “no reputable scientist has opposed global warming” or “only doctors paid off by Big Pharma will tell you HIV is related to AIDS”.

I posted a photo line-up of bullets earlier. See if you can spot the one that supposedly caused 7 wounds on 2 men.