MO:RKBA Amendment Results 5 August Election

Gun Watch ^ | 6 August, 2014 | Dean Weingarten

[marktwain]

Today is elections day in Missouri.   The race that I am watching is the Missouri Constitutional Amendment 5, which has been adamantly opposed by those who wish a disarmed population.  It is a clear stating of the right to keep and bear arms, clarifying that it is a fundamental right; that it protects ammunition and accessories as well as firearms; and that the State is obligated to protect that right.  Here is the ballot question and the actual amendment:


Official Ballot Title:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to include a declaration that the right to keep and bear arms is a unalienable right and that the state government is obligated to uphold that right?

State and local governmental entities should have no direct costs or savings from this proposal. However, the proposal’s passage will likely lead to increased litigation and criminal justice related costs. The total potential costs are unknown, but could be significant.

Fair Ballot Language:

A "yes" vote will amend the Missouri Constitution to expand the right to keep and bear arms to include ammunition and related accessories for such arms. This amendment also removes the language that states the right to keep and bear arms does not justify the wearing of concealed weapons. This amendment does not prevent the legislature from limiting the rights of certain felons and certain individuals adjudicated as having a mental disorder.

A "no"; [sic] vote will not amend the Missouri Constitution regarding arms, ammunition, and accessories for such arms.

If passed, this measure will have no impact on taxes. 

Here is the actual constitutional amendment:

 Section 23. That the right of every citizen to keep and bear arms, ammunition, and accessories typical to the normal function of such arms, in defense of his home, person, family and property, or when lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned
; but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons. The rights guaranteed by this section shall be unalienable. Any restriction on these rights shall be subject to strict scrutiny and the state of Missouri shall be obligated to uphold these rights and shall under no circumstances decline to protect against their infringement. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the general assembly from enacting general laws which limit the rights of convicted violent felons or those duly adjudged mentally infirm by a court of competent jurisdiction.

The earliest returns have just come in  Amendment 5 is ahead with 74% of the vote in these very preliminary returns:

 

Constitutional Amendment 5   Yes  509    No 175   That is 4 precincts reporting out of  3898

 

Here is a link to the Secretary of State page.   The amendment results are at the bottom

 ©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch

[marktwain]

Please feel free to post updated election results as they come in.

[gorush]

I’ll be back.

[marktwain]

A few more precincts have reported in;

Yes 6,545

NO 2,983

29 of 3898 precincts reporting

[riverrunner]

thanks for the link 68 percent rt now

[marktwain]

Yes 15,575

No 5,690

71 of 3898 Precincts reporting in.

[gorush]

Nice trend...but very early.

[deoetdoctrinae]

Constitutional Amendment 5 664 of 3898 Precincts Reported
YES 152,191 70.130%
NO 64,821 29.870%
Total Votes: 217,012

[Windflier]

Nice trend on that vote. I’m here in Texas crossing my fingers that it holds.

[Just another Joe]

Missouri ping

Low volume ping list

FReepmail me to be on, or off, this list.

[Robert A Cook PE]

So far, good trend.

Too many ahead votes to by “bought off” by inner city corruption “late” ballot returns.

[marktwain]

Yes 582,944

No 354,554

3712 of 3898 precincts reporting

Looks like Amendment 5 passes with 62% of the vote.

[riverrunner]

Constitutional Amendment 5 3898 of 3898 Precincts Reported
YES 602,076 60.970%
NO 385,422 39.030%
Total Votes: 987,498

[painter]

You know what bothers me.

Over 385,000 people don't think we should have that right.

[riverrunner]

I could never understand people voting for less freedom

[RedMDer]

Support Free Republic

I can not and will not support politicians
who support any more limits on our
Second Amendment rights.

[greeneyes]

Thanks for the ping, Joe. Glad this passed. I heard that it failed in St.Louis. Don’t know about KC. Like so often, it’s the country folk vs city folk when it comes to a way of life.