World's worst trade.
Posted on 11/03/2013 1:13:38 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
In its Sunday paper, The New York Times editorial board defended President Barack Obama from criticisms that he had intentionally misled the public when he had claimed if an individual likes their health insurance plan, they could keep their health insurance plan.
The paper’s board also attacked congressional Republicans for stoking fear and confusion, writing that Obama “clearly misspoke” when he repeatedly claimed Americans could keep their health insurance plans as he fought to pass the law and defend it during the 2012 election.
“Mr. Obama clearly misspoke when he said that,” the editorial read. “By law, insurers cannot continue to sell policies that don’t provide the minimum benefits and consumer protections required as of next year. So they’ve sent cancellation notices to hundreds of thousands of people who hold these substandard policies. (At issue here are not the 149 million people covered by employer plans, but the 10 million to 12 million people who buy policies directly on the individual market.)”
Later in the editorial, the Times described Obama’s contradicted claims as an overblown controversy.
“This overblown controversy has also obscured the crux of what health care reform is trying to do, which is to guarantee that everyone can buy insurance without being turned away or charged exorbitant rates for pre-existing conditions and that everyone can receive benefits that really protect them against financial or medical disaster, not illusory benefits that prove inadequate when a crisis strikes,” the editorial said.
I know the correct meaning of misspoke, but in Obamalies it means lies.
FRAUD
World's worst trade.
And why shouldn't they?
You might want to reconsider...
Genesis 3
1 Now the snake was the most clever of all the wild animals the Lord God had made. One day the snake said to the woman, “Did God really say that you must not eat fruit from any tree in the garden?”
2 The woman answered the snake, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden.
3 But God told us, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden. You must not even touch it, or you will die.’”
4 But the snake said to the woman, “You will not die.
5 God knows that if you eat the fruit from that tree, you will learn about good and evil and you will be like God!”
6 The woman saw that the tree was beautiful, that its fruit was good to eat, and that it would make her wise. So she took some of its fruit and ate it. She also gave some of the fruit to her husband who was with her, and he ate it.
I think that would be a good strategy. It may work - but if not, it would continually point out the lie and that it was bogus and lame to lie to get it through.
I know that God already knew what was going to happen,
but I wonder what kind of contingency plan He’d have had to do if Adam didn’t go along with Eve.
The paradox comes from our inability to understand God who is outside time.
He had no need for a contingency plan. Some people perceive Jesus’ sacrifice as a Plan B, but John tells us the Lamb was slain from the foundations of the world.
The paradox comes from our inability to understand God who is outside time.
He had no need for a contingency plan. Some people perceive Jesus’ sacrifice as a Plan B, but John tells us the Lamb was slain from the foundations of the world.
0bama clearly “misspoke”, and lied while doing so.
And YOU might want to reconsider.
http://www.tlogical.net/adameve.htm
The fact that when questioned by God, Eve blames the serpent for deceiving her, but Adam blames Eve (and God for giving him her) but not blaming the serpent - Adam wasn’t deceived by the serpent.
He was WITH HER in the garden, but not RIGHT THERE WITH HER. The actual Jewish Torah (1st 5 bible books) do not have the WITH HER phrase in them. Several bible translations do not, the later ones have added this in.
It’s like I am with my wife IN THE HOUSE but not RIGHT THERE with her, I’m upstairs, she’s in the kitchen, and she brings me something to eat.
Someone's been reading FR: “@DLoesch: Can teleprompters misspeak?”
And he lied in covering up benghazi
No guarantee though, for those who liked their insurance and got kicked out.
What a TOTAL bunch of tripe this is!!
President Pinocchio.
The New York Slimes and their less well-known MSM brethren have about as much credibility as "Pravda."
Obama did not “mis spoke.” Obama looked the American people in the eye and lied. His speech was lie after lie after lie, and now he is lying about what he meant in the speech.
The president is a liar.
Liar is merely the most likely possibility. But there is also an outside chance that he’s just a dumbass.
“Wait, individual market? what’s that?”
Actually, nowadays, “PRAVDA” has some good articles.
But I Do agree with you, completely and unequivocally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.