Posted on 08/29/2013 6:32:59 AM PDT by opentalk
In a great article in the Independent, Robert Frisk points out that if Obama attacks Syrian leader Assads army, the US and Al Qaeda would be on the same side. However, Frisk incorrectly states that this would be the first time. Not so.
As Gateway Pundit pointed out in prior posts, Obama was on the same side as Al Qaeda in Libya when bombing Gaddafi and his forces. Obama, also, sided with the terrorist organization, the Muslim Brotherhood, in Egypt, even providing them with $1.5 billion in aid, and then taking it away after they were overthrown.
Pundits have tried to figure out Obamas motives. Some say Obama is driven by anti -colonialism like his father. Obamas anti-colonialism makes sense, but doesnt address all of Obamas motives in the Middle East, or necessarily his attacks against Christians and Jews. Others say that Obama is on the side of Islamists, which doesnt address his siding with one Islamist group (Al Qaeda) over another Islamist group, or Islamist group wannabe like Assad. What does make sense is Obamas policy of always siding with the Muslim Sunni sect.
As Barry Rubin at PJ Media points out, Muslim Sunnis have been at odds with Muslim Shias, and vice versa, for a long time. Shia representatives Iran and Hezbollah support Assad. Sunni representatives, including Al Qaeda, support the Islamic rebels and the Muslim Brotherhood. Sunnis account for about 80% of the Muslim world. When Obama moves, he moves not with Christians, Jews or the majority of most Americans, Obama moves with the Muslim Sunni sect
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Bunch of islamophobes.
0bama is a Muslim Brother.
Sunnis are the main source of terrorist activity. Same difference. Al Qeida, 9/11, WTC bombing, most of the fighting in Iraq was the 10% Sunni that demanded to rule, the Beslan atrocity, the Chechyn war, the Boston Bombers, the shoe bomber, the London bombings, the Spain bombings,, etc etc.
All Sunni. The Saudi Royals pay the freight for this stuff with the understanding that they do it elsewhere and not threaten them.
0bama-ruled America is consistently allied with Al Qaeda.
1) Quit Afghanistan leaving it to the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
2) Hand Libya to the Islamists, including Al Qaeda.
3) Fund the Muslim Brothers in Egypt, the parent of Al Qaeda.
4) Support the “Rebels”, Al Qaeda in Syria.
The evidence shows 0bama supports Al Qaeda.
1 Obama left Iraq to the Terrorists.
2 Obama sided with Terrorists in Libya.
3 Obama sided with Terrorists in Egypt.
4 Obama sides with Terrorists in Syria.
5 Obama sides with the Fort Hood Terrorist.
Might be a tell tale pattern there.
It’s nice to see at least some in the media catching up with our recent Free Republic posts. The idea that the common denominator for the Obama Foreign Policy is simply his support for the Sunni Muslims, the Obama Tribe, is certainly not new here at FR.
We have recognized the truth of this for some time. I’m thinking that the media is reading our stuff. That’s good.
Obama’s foolish but consistent policy translates into his support for the Muslim Brotherhood and indirectly for al Qaeda, the Jihad threat that we are, or should be, fighting against. With Obama we are supporting that enemy not fighting it. Sad to say.
I think it’s a good point (that he always supports Sunnis) but I think the reason he does it is that he sees them as the most anti-Western group he can find. Obama is so dumb and so filled with hatred for the West (because of his confused Third-World-identified Marxist mindset) that he gravitates to the group he thinks most thoroughly rejects the West and its ideas.
And that would certainly be Sunni Muslims, as they have proved time and again.
Obamas favorite Oldie But Goodie
Sunni, yesterday my life was filled with rain
Sunni, you smiled at me and really eased the pain
Oh, the dark days are done
The bright days are here
My sunni one shines so sincere
Sunni one so true
I love you
Bobby Hebb, 1966
IF they were reading OUR stuff, they would be far more interested in which madrassa ohaha spent his vacay time in pockeystan...and why. I would bet my right arm that the dude is a full blown imam. It shows in his speeches when he really gets into it. It shows in his gestures. He doesn’t drift into the ‘black’ thing when he reverts. He drifts into the muslim thing, and he has done it over and over.
Gestures like, especially, the way he holds up his hand with the index finger and thumb together.
And there is not a doubt in my mind. That is why they script him and watch him so closely. It’s like English is his second language. Corpse, anyone?
placemark
Rand Slams Congress for Funding Egypt’s Generals:
‘How Does Your Conscience Feel Now?’
Foreign Policy | 15 Aug 2013 | John Hudson
Posted on 08/15/2013 5:44:10 PM PDT by Hoodat
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3055253/posts
Sen. Rand Paul is hammering his fellow senators for keeping billions in financial aid flowing to Egypt’s military — even as Cairo’s security forces massacre anti-government activists.
[by “anti-government activists” is meant church-burning jihadists]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.