Ah, how foolish of me to think that a freeper might have gone to college. I remember it being rather easy to do.
FReepers are stupid comment from a retread 0bot.
Posted on 08/07/2013 6:29:11 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
The following image is a composite created by scanning the WH LFBC using Xerox WorkCentre 7655 upside down using the automatic feeder. The resulting file was opened in Preview, the image rotated 180 degrees and printed to PDF. The resulting PDF was opened in preview, the layers unlocked and moved to the side. In addition, a close up of the signature was ‘blown up’ to show how the background layer, not surprisingly, has filled in some of the white that resulted from the separation of the background and foreground layers.
Note how for example the signature block is fully separated.
(Excerpt) Read more at nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
Sorry, but this explanation doesn't hold water. There would be no way to accurately hold the document on to the scanner bed and ensure the entirety fit within the entered dimensions. The result would be truncated and certainly not aligned.
And of course, there’s those textbooks in college that I might have somehow managed to accidentally drop onto a scanner and just happen to hit the copy button...
You're defaulting to an irrelevant anecdote. We have no proof of what you're talking about or that it any way involved the workflow process you came up with. It's okay to admit you're wrong.
Ah, how foolish of me to think that a freeper might have gone to college. I remember it being rather easy to do. But memory is a tricky thing. So I tried it this morning, using a 1300+ page textbook from my college days (I realized that if there are 500 records, that means there’s probably 1000 pages). It turns out that a book of that size actually makes it really easy to place accurately on a scanner bed. The weight holds it in place, so you can make fine adjustments, play with settings, and even walk away and scan from your computer. Granted, I don’t have the ability to set the size of the original, so that part I can’t test, but getting it well-aligned was a snap.
W. Kevin Vicklund
Since Aug 11, 2013
Upon re-reading, my comment may have conveyed more of a zing than I intended. The “rather easy to do” comment was not in regards to going to college, but in regards to photocopying a page from a large textbook. To those who took it as the former, I apologize for my imprecise language. I do not apologize for the light-hearted poke in the first sentence - he left himself wide open for that.
I had not intended to stay overlong, as this forum is not really intended for social libertarians.
Let’s try this again, with better punctuation and spelling:
Unlike many of the Obot site pests who troll Free Republic on eligibility issues while pretending to be conservatives, W. Kevin Vicklund is quite honest. He is a liberal of sorts who believes that he has found a novel argument about how the Obama Birth Certificate may have been created.
Rather than communicate from afar via his blog, he has joined Free Republic explicitly to create a dialogue about the birth certificate issues. I see nothing wrong with an honest liberal joining the site for dialogue. I am more upset that threads like these bring out a large number of Free Republic posters who claim that they are conservative but write almost exclusively on eligibility issues from a perspective that solely supports the Obama administration.
Ban these impostors first! If you want a list, I can help.
IMO, the Peter-Boy BC’s signature stamp looked closer to Johanna Ah’nee’s (especially the Onaka name and the Ph.D.) than to later signature stamps.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2997228/replies?c=39
As for the overlapping numbers in the bates stamp. Because you are looking at bleed through of ink into the paper, it may be that the overlap is the ink spreading out through the paper. Only by looking at the front of the document can we be sure of the number’s spacing.
Also there is a possibility that Miki Booth convinced her friend to submit her BC.
From a comment(John says: August 10, 2013 at 13:46) at NBC’s blog:
Apparently, Miki did send her originals to the CCP.
“I provided all our birth certificates to CCP and that of a friend who was born 2 weeks after oblowme. They ran over 400 tests and none could replicate the forgery.”
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/08/10/xerox-7655-ap-character-degradations/
I’ve not been able to find this exact quote, it may be a transcription from a interview.
But if Miki Booth does know Johanna Ah’nee that would go a long way towards verifying that the BC is legit.
That’s my view also. He’s using the same name that he uses on Dr Con’s site, not trying to pretend to be somebody he’s not, and he’s engaging with the content which is all we can really ask of anybody. It’s difficult to go in a place where your views are outnumbered because people gang up on you and you can’t keep up, so I appreciate his willingness to come here. Doesn’t mean I agree with everything he’s saying, but if he’s willing to engage, that’s what this place is for.
Not necessarily, because the tactic I’ve observed over and over again - and that one of Obama’s communist buddies (Cass Sunstein? I’d have to check which one) stated outright as the method for “correcting errors” - is to infiltrate sources that are considered credible and use that to introduce disinformation. I’ve seen it used on me and I’ve sensed when it was being attempted to use me as a means to deceive somebody else.
The Ah Nee forgery was not recognized as a forgery because it had the signs of authenticity - of being from the HDOH. But the presumption that it is non-fabricated just because it is known to be from the HDOH is blown out of the water by the proof that the 1960-64 birth index was manipulated by the HDOH to include names from legally non-valid records. Once you know that the HDOH is willing to fabricate and manipulate records in order to deceive, you know you have to look deeper than just the raised seal. The Virginia Sunahara death certificate clinches that the fabrication includes actual certified vital records.
I have seen an image of the front side of the Ah Nee BC. The numbers overlap. Others have said they wish WND would publish the whole front side; I agree. If people saw it they would see what I mean.
The Peter-Boy signature stamp has features that aren’t on other Onaka signatures but that are close enough to his signature that it could be his. The Ah Nee BC has a signature that exaggerates those features to a point that they are out of character for Onaka. Onaka doesn’t make extra motions in his signature. His fingers might slip a little when making an n, for instance, resulting in a little bit of curve on it. But he would not make big enough and consistent enough slips that the whole thing looks curvy. I wouldn’t expect him to dot his i’s with hearts or cross his t’s with a flourish either.
I have a friend who teaches grade-schoolers. She writes very slowly and is careful to give her letters the slant, loops, tails, etc that are in a penmanship manual. It is painful to watch her write because it is so slow. I could never do that because I don’t have the time or patience. My signature has some loops and tails sometimes but for the most part it looks like I’m taking the fastest route to get the job done - because I am. Onaka’s handwriting is the same way. The Ah Nee signature is too careful, too time-consuming, and makes too much out of small slips that are not characteristic of Onaka’s writing. I can do a pretty good impersonation of Onaka’s signature just because the way he makes his letters is a fast way to make them. But if I was deliberately trying to make the signature look like the Peter-Boy one it would screw me up. I would have to be too careful, like whoever forged that signature.
“method for “correcting errors” - is to infiltrate sources”
So the questions are:
Does Miki Booth know Ah’nee?
For how long?
And did Miki talk her friend into providing the BC?
Here one account that may be from Ah’nee’s:
The date on the bottom of that document is 4/25/2011. The copy was made before the press gaggle (see http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/04/27/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carney-4272011 ) ; the copies were stapled together (see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/27/obama-birth-certificate-r_n_854248.html ) Strange that there aren’t any staple marks on the photo. The PDF wasn’t made until 12:11:23PM on 4-27 - almost exactly 2 minutes after the long-form PDF was made. It has the same properties as the long-form (Mac OS x 10.6.7 and PDF Version 1.3)
They created that page on the computer in order to print it out with the headers. But the PDF was not created on the Mac until after the gaggle.
The whitehouse.gov site doesn’t have a copy of the long-form printout they made for the press. And for good reason. That can’t be a scan in black and white, because the cross-hatches at the far left got picked up in the scan. But just on the top part of the page. There is a clear line where the BC portion stops and the certification portion - with no cross-hatches - begins. That can’t be explained by a photocopier/scanner, even if the copier/scanner was set to black/white. And especially it can’t be explained if the scan was set to be so sensitive that it picked up print from a page behind the page being scanned but didn’t pick up any of the cross-hatches in the certification portion of the copy.
That “white copy” of the long-form is a dead giveaway of funny business because it has a distinct line where the cross-hatches end.
I did some experimenting with contrast and brightness on what I know to be a scan of a genuine HDOH vital record, as well as on the White House image. When it is set to black-and-white there are NO cross-hatches that show up on either one. Anywhere. No matter what contrast I use.
When it’s not in black and white, I can use constrast and brightness to get the cross-hatches to turn a light yellow, but some of the print also disappears when I do that. Of course, that’s especially difficult with the White House image because I can’t get most of the print to show up in Word anyway. Most of the letters are white. This is the only document I have EVER had that happen with.
It wouldn’t matter how long anybody knew each other. The way the method works is by using trusted sources - like using Miki Booth’s credibility in order to have her friend pass off a BC that was recently given to her by the HDOh, with a “date issued” from 1995. Miki thought the BC copy really was issued in 1995. Ah Nee knew it was not. Because Miki was the connection to WND, they thought it was credible - plus the seal showed that t was from the HDOH, it was just an HDOH fabrication, similar to Virginia Sunahara’s death certificate or the 1960-64 birth index.
People know I’m for real and have connections with Zullo. And there have been people who tried to use me to get to Zullo. If they can trick me and I pass something on to Zullo, they can use it to distract and/or slam Zullo. That’s what Zullo has been dealing with. U;ve been VERY careful with what I’ve recommended to Zullo.
The Fogbowers have admitted to fabricating documents and trying to get them to Orly. Somebody real gave information to Orly about Obama’s foreign student aid and Orly paraded it before the world so that the regime was able to expunge those records before her trusting source ever got the proof in hand. It’s a very dirty “game”. A LOT of deception.
Blogger NBC has a new post up showing a pdf created by a Xerox that he claims has “halos, x-ray effect and identical pixel elements.”
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/08/14/scoresheet/
“August 18 Today has been another great day. Two new PDF’s were found that were scanned on Xerox. They show the YCbCr comment and align at 8 bit boundaries.”
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/08/19/the-museum-pdf/
“The Museum PDF”
Posted on August 19, 2013 by NBC
“The document is an 11×17 scan, in ‘portrait’, so no messy rotations but several features have been checked. The YCbCr comment string is, once again, present. The Quantization Matrices are the same and the foreground images align. The document also shows halos, x-ray effect and identical pixel elements.”
On that Hawaii short form that someone sent you. Is the seal debossed or embossed? From the image you posted the writing in the seal is in the correct orientation on the side where the registrar stamp is and that appears to be on the back of the document.
I zoomed in on the word “AUGUST” in the USA TODAY title. The “U”s are pixel for pixel the same.
How about the halos and “x-ray effect”? Do you see those?
That is correct; it is debossed.
That is correct; it is debossed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.