IMO, the Peter-Boy BC’s signature stamp looked closer to Johanna Ah’nee’s (especially the Onaka name and the Ph.D.) than to later signature stamps.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2997228/replies?c=39
As for the overlapping numbers in the bates stamp. Because you are looking at bleed through of ink into the paper, it may be that the overlap is the ink spreading out through the paper. Only by looking at the front of the document can we be sure of the number’s spacing.
Also there is a possibility that Miki Booth convinced her friend to submit her BC.
From a comment(John says: August 10, 2013 at 13:46) at NBC’s blog:
Apparently, Miki did send her originals to the CCP.
“I provided all our birth certificates to CCP and that of a friend who was born 2 weeks after oblowme. They ran over 400 tests and none could replicate the forgery.”
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/08/10/xerox-7655-ap-character-degradations/
I’ve not been able to find this exact quote, it may be a transcription from a interview.
But if Miki Booth does know Johanna Ah’nee that would go a long way towards verifying that the BC is legit.
Not necessarily, because the tactic I’ve observed over and over again - and that one of Obama’s communist buddies (Cass Sunstein? I’d have to check which one) stated outright as the method for “correcting errors” - is to infiltrate sources that are considered credible and use that to introduce disinformation. I’ve seen it used on me and I’ve sensed when it was being attempted to use me as a means to deceive somebody else.
The Ah Nee forgery was not recognized as a forgery because it had the signs of authenticity - of being from the HDOH. But the presumption that it is non-fabricated just because it is known to be from the HDOH is blown out of the water by the proof that the 1960-64 birth index was manipulated by the HDOH to include names from legally non-valid records. Once you know that the HDOH is willing to fabricate and manipulate records in order to deceive, you know you have to look deeper than just the raised seal. The Virginia Sunahara death certificate clinches that the fabrication includes actual certified vital records.
I have seen an image of the front side of the Ah Nee BC. The numbers overlap. Others have said they wish WND would publish the whole front side; I agree. If people saw it they would see what I mean.
The Peter-Boy signature stamp has features that aren’t on other Onaka signatures but that are close enough to his signature that it could be his. The Ah Nee BC has a signature that exaggerates those features to a point that they are out of character for Onaka. Onaka doesn’t make extra motions in his signature. His fingers might slip a little when making an n, for instance, resulting in a little bit of curve on it. But he would not make big enough and consistent enough slips that the whole thing looks curvy. I wouldn’t expect him to dot his i’s with hearts or cross his t’s with a flourish either.
I have a friend who teaches grade-schoolers. She writes very slowly and is careful to give her letters the slant, loops, tails, etc that are in a penmanship manual. It is painful to watch her write because it is so slow. I could never do that because I don’t have the time or patience. My signature has some loops and tails sometimes but for the most part it looks like I’m taking the fastest route to get the job done - because I am. Onaka’s handwriting is the same way. The Ah Nee signature is too careful, too time-consuming, and makes too much out of small slips that are not characteristic of Onaka’s writing. I can do a pretty good impersonation of Onaka’s signature just because the way he makes his letters is a fast way to make them. But if I was deliberately trying to make the signature look like the Peter-Boy one it would screw me up. I would have to be too careful, like whoever forged that signature.