Xerox 7655 Overview Picture (Obot claims to replicate Obama LFBC pdf w/floating signature)

Native and Natural Born Citizenship Explored ^ | August 6, 2013 | NBC

[Seizethecarp]

The following image is a composite created by scanning the WH LFBC using Xerox WorkCentre 7655 upside down using the automatic feeder. The resulting file was opened in Preview, the image rotated 180 degrees and printed to PDF. The resulting PDF was opened in preview, the layers unlocked and moved to the side. In addition, a close up of the signature was ‘blown up’ to show how the background layer, not surprisingly, has filled in some of the white that resulted from the separation of the background and foreground layers.

Note how for example the signature block is fully separated.

[butterdezillion]

And especially bizarre when you consider that Deputy AG Jill Nagamine said in court that Duncan Sunahara could not get a certified copy of his sister’s long-form because it might damage the fragile paper. The implication being that they won’t disclose long-forms because they would HAVE to make copies from the bound book because they don’t HAVE digital scans of the documents that they could use. If that is the case, then EVERY long-form issued - ever - should have been photocopied from a book onto security paper. It should be a piece of cake for them to come up with examples. Heck, Johanna Ah Nee’s long-form should have the same phenomenon...

[W. Kevin Vicklund]

“Second, has anyone ever scanned a page in a book or scanned documents in a “bound volume”?? It’s very hard to do. A volume with 500 records would be very hard to place on a scanner bed and hold still, plus the scanner lid can’t be closed tightly over the book.”

Actually, last month I finished a project where we did have to photocopy a page from a bound volume, around 480 pages as I recall (done in April) - it was just a bit smaller than a ream. A Xerox WorkCentre of some sort was used to do this. The quality of the photocopy is similar to the LFBC (though it was just text and form lines). A shadow just like in the BC, and the edge shows a progressive curve. In fact, the curve flattens out, and then starts curving the other way. It probably requires a high-end machine to have any quality.

BTW, is anybody else having problems accessing large portions of the internet? Google, FB, Amazon, Bing are all down, and my wife says the same.

[W. Kevin Vicklund]

“Why did the cross-hatches go away on most of the document? Why are there cross-hatches on the BC part but not the certification part? When you adjust the brightness and contrast you can actually see an abrupt line in the bottom as well as the side of the BC part, where it and its cross-hatches stop.

How did the 7655 do that? How did it stop the cross-hatches precisely at the left and bottom edge of the BC part, leaving the certification part as if it is floating on a piece of paper separate from the BC image? What workflow accounts for that?”

Which image are you talking about? There a number out there, created by several different methods (scanning the original, digital camera of a B&W copy, modifying a previous image, etc.), so I don’t want to talk about the wrong image.

[edge919]

So, your scan has a shadow that ends within a box in the middle of a page??

[Seizethecarp]

Thanks for the ping to Gallups update on Zullo’s reaction to the claims that the LFBC can be replicated on a Xerox.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QZjEzzok-g#at=2024

Transcript beginning @27:30

Gallups: If we discover where he was or was not born in this process and, by the way, we WILL discover that and, by the way,...I’ve got to be careful here...we pretty much already know...

Transcript beginning @ 37:28

Gallups: You were asking about the Xerox machine. Here’s the thing. The Obamabots are DYING for me or Zullo to talk about what we know about that. They think they’ve found the goose that laid the golden egg and they’re dying to know what we know about it! Well, Zullo and I, we are NOT going to expose...this is a part of a criminal investigation and when it comes before Congress then Congress will know everything, but I can tell you IT IS OF NO CONCERN! And you’ve got to ask yourself, why would these guys five years into this all of a sudden say “oh we’ve got a particular machine that can do these things”? I mean, just think about what they’re doing and the timing of what they’re doing.

[W. Kevin Vicklund]

“Heck, Johanna Ah Nee’s long-form should have the same phenomenon...”

I note that the Ah’Nee long-form does have the curved line and shadow. Of course, Obama’s shows more of the area next to the spine, so the shadow and curvature is naturally more intense.

[W. Kevin Vicklund]

The shadow has an abrupt stop at the edge of the scanned image, yes.

[4Zoltan]

“BTW, is anybody else having problems accessing large portions of the internet? Google, FB, Amazon, Bing are all down, and my wife says the same.”

Nope they work for me.

[Ray76]

“And you’ve got to ask yourself, why would these guys five years into this all of a sudden say ‘oh we’ve got a particular machine that can do these things’?”

Why would HI DOH refuse SOS Bennett a routine document when that same document is publicly posted?

The answer to these questions is the same: lie stacked upon lie stacked upon lie.

Now just hear Obama’s smug arrogant petulant voice in your head, “I never said I was a natural born citizen”

[edge919]

Do you know what I’m talking about?? The shadow should be on the entire document, not just within a box in the middle of the page. Otherwise, the image had to be manipulated, saved and then printed out on the security paper. It wasn’t scanned directly to the security paper.

[butterdezillion]

Yeah, it’s hard to know what I mean without the images right in front of you. I made a PDF to show what I’m talking about. You can see it at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/disappearing-security-background.pdf

[edge919]

If the scanned image was printed directly onto the scanner paper, the shadow should run the length of the entire document. Here's an example: Maybe the DOH's scanner lets the image be cropped during scanning, but then we're left with a scan that is almost perfectly centered from side to side with the lines in the certificate almost exactly straight and square. Keep in mind, this is NOT the typical way the DOH produces a certificate, so to come up with something this clean and this precise in one try is extraordinary. Yet, despite all these clean lines and the clean scan, the text has a wide variety of discrepancies and anomalies. Weird.

[Mr. K]

it doesn’t matter- its total bull$hit

he claims to explain away one thing (not very well) and ignores 40 pages of other things

[W. Kevin Vicklund]

“Maybe the DOH’s scanner lets the image be cropped during scanning, but then we’re left with a scan that is almost perfectly centered from side to side with the lines in the certificate almost exactly straight and square. Keep in mind, this is NOT the typical way the DOH produces a certificate, so to come up with something this clean and this precise in one try is extraordinary.”

It’s not the way they do it now, but it is th way they did it for decades. Is it really that hard to believe that they didn’t have guides on the old equipment to line the pages up so that it would print cleanly? They still occasionally used this equipment at least into the mid ‘00s for special requests (even after the switch to the digital COLB, there were some governmental programs that required a long form, to prove that parents were of Native Hawai’ian birth, though I understand this is no longer required).

[4Zoltan]

This one has the bend, the shadows. But the bend is at the bottom and the horizontal lines bend upward. http://rcradioblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/090811authenticbcoriginal3.jpg Also a lot of the entries are centered in the boxes.

[4Zoltan]

Here’s the link to the BC image.

http://rcradioblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/090811authenticbcoriginal3.jpg

[butterdezillion]

Why the black line drawn in on the bottom of that? We need to see the whole piece of security paper.

It always astounds me when people who have admitted to forging a Kenyan BC and giving it to Orly to submit in a lawsuit expect us to consider anything they present as credible. They burned that bridge long, long ago. If they wanted to be credible they should have abstained from immoral if not criminal activity. Why should any of us believe they aren’t trying to punk us with everything they say?

[4Zoltan]

You would have to ask Jerome Corsi - he published it in WND. They published this version first and then redacted it.

http://www.wnd.com/2011/09/342937/

But even after they redacted it, the locations of the entries are discernible. So you can see that the box entries are centered in the boxes.

[W. Kevin Vicklund]

“Yeah, it’s hard to know what I mean without the images right in front of you. I made a PDF to show what I’m talking about.”

Thanks. I believe my previous comment explains that - high-end copiers have the ability to crop original images and center them on the page when copying. On a Xerox WorkCentre, for instance, you can set the Original Size to a custom area and Auto Center from the Image Layout tab. Note that the hinge can potentially get in the way if you wanted to try this on an area in the center of the page, but it appears that this wasn’t a problem because the Obama record was on the top left of the right page, making it very easy to align.

[4Zoltan]

This copy was issued in 1995 so it is not the full 8.5 x 11 copy but is the small version like Edith Coates 1995 BC.

The date stamp and the registrar stamps are on the back.