Posted on 08/07/2013 6:29:11 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
The following image is a composite created by scanning the WH LFBC using Xerox WorkCentre 7655 upside down using the automatic feeder. The resulting file was opened in Preview, the image rotated 180 degrees and printed to PDF. The resulting PDF was opened in preview, the layers unlocked and moved to the side. In addition, a close up of the signature was ‘blown up’ to show how the background layer, not surprisingly, has filled in some of the white that resulted from the separation of the background and foreground layers.
Note how for example the signature block is fully separated.
(Excerpt) Read more at nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
Breaking Ping
Here is Mike Zullo’s thoughts on the Xerox scenario that everybody has been debating. This is from a Carl Gallups interview earlier.
Go to exactly 33:20 in the audio.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QZjEzzok-g#at=2024
“That Nordyke-like left bend is a phenomena of a copy being made while the document is still in a bound volume.”
The DOH told WND’s document expert (Ivan Zatkovich) how they created the LFBC.
“A representative of the Hawaii Department of Health described how the copy of the Obama Birth Certificate was produced. She stated that the copy of Obama’s birth certificate was produced by taking the original paper birth certificate, which was black printing on white paper. The original is then placed on the photocopy machine and that image is copied onto green ‘safety paper’. That green copy is then stamped, dated and signed by the State Registrar.”
http://www.ecompconsultants.com/news/Obama-report.pdf
If not taken out of the bound volume it would be almost the same procedure as used to make photostatic copies back in the 1960’s.
There’s a major problem when the state of Hawaii decides they need to move a standard document for “added security.” Why would this document need added security?? The governor had pledged to find this record when he was elected and make it public. Hawaii’s Uniform Information Practices Act provides immunity from liability for ANY member of the government who discloses such a document in good faith to meet a public interest. That public interest was already expressed by the current governor. Basically, this means the HI DOH is trying to prevent anyone from releasing the original document(s) to the public, which runs counter to their own laws and their governor’s publicized objective. Moreover, this means there’s no way to determine if Obama’s alleged birth record was bound into a book. If his record is in lockdown, wouldn’t that also apply to 499 other records?? Or, did they remove Obama’s alleged record from the bound book to put it in lockdown?? If they did that, then it should have been scanned flat.
You must be new - LoL.
No, Abercrombie could only find some scribble in the state archives after a search probably in some log covered in dust. An article from the Hawaiian Star Advertiser, January 18th, 2011:
Gov. AberCommie - "It is actually written...it actually exists... archives written down...."
Oh, it is written down! Hahahaa...
An additional reply to bluecat6 from NBC regarding the “left bend”:
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/08/16/bluecat6-bends/
Bluecat6 Bends
Posted on August 16, 2013 by NBC
Bluecat: Another non-technical red flag is the Nordyke-like shadowed left bend. That should not be there. Its in the Nordykes certified copies. But for good reason – their COPIES were made in 1965! Well before the originals were scanned into a digital (likely optical WORM) library. Images stored in the digital library are SCANNED FLAT.
NBC: Good points but there is only one major flaw, this was not the workflow used by the DOH of HI.
Source: The first is that the original so-called “long form” birth certificate — described by Hawaiian officials as a “record of live birth” — absolutely exists, located in a bound volume in a file cabinet on the first floor of the state Department of Health. Fukimo said she has personally inspected it — twice. The first time was in late October 2008, during the closing days of the presidential campaign, when the communications director for the state’s then Republican governor, Linda Lingle (who appointed Fukino) asked if she could make a public statement in response to claims then circulating on the Internet that Obama was actually born in Kenya.
Bluecat: Except for a very slight bend the images printed on security paper are flat in their appearance. That Nordyke-like left bend is a phenomena of a copy being made while the document is still in a bound volume. To scan them – they unbind them and scan them flat. There has yet to be another example of a LFBC image printed on security paper with a transparent background that looks like Obama’s LFBC. In this regard is truly a only-one-on-this-earth ‘document’.
NBC: You presume that they unbound them…
Source: “After the 2008 elections, the Department of Health received a significant number of requests for a copy of President Obama’s original birth registration by individuals who believe that the president is not a U.S. citizen,” Fukino explained. “To assure the safety of the record, the bound volume was removed from the file vault and placed into a fireproof safe with limited access.”
Source: She explained that the official Obama birth record absolutely exists – in a bound volume in a file cabinet on the first floor of the state Department of Health. When she released her first statements on the issue she carefully explained that the record was with the state in accordance with state law, but did not explain what that would mean.
Source: Obama’s original certificate of live birth is bound with one ledger containing 499 other certificates of people born in Hawaii in 1961, according to Fukino. There are 500 sheets per book, and 35 volumes of 1961 birth records. The last series of digits in the registration number found on Hawaiian long form and current computerized-format birth certificates indicate which number volume the original document can be found inside the health department first-floor vault.
NBC: According to Fukino, all books bound in the 1960s, including the one containing Obama’s birth certificate, have a bright orange elasticized canvas cover and the year of the birth designated on its spine.
So producing more examples should not be a problem.
23 hours.
I should say listen to the entirety from 33:20 to 38:11. Thanks.
There shouldn’t be any edge erase. And the same size problem exists between the scan of the 2008 COLB and the document that was allegedly photographed at a different time by factlack dot org, except in the 2008 jpg, you can see the edge of the paper and the shadow of the paper on the scanner bed in the image. There was no clipping mask applied. The document in the factlack photos is not the same document that was scanned or created.
The most logical reason to apply a clipping mask is to resize an image to a pre-determined size. An automatic clipping mask runs the risk of degrading desired parts of an image or document, so there’s no reason there would or should have been an automatic clipping mask.
Xerox controversy.
Zullo is completely aware ...
Gallups - “It is of no concern”
“NBC: According to Fukino,...”
Are we not all getting sick of the words...ACCORDING TO....
According Richard Nixon - he was not a crook. But he was the highest government official. Guess we should have taken his word.
I am from Missouri....show me examples of that match the infamous image.
If other examples can not be produced, the this is all BS. And these people are pathetic.
Its simple - show some examples that match the basic structure of the WH LFBC.
The sizes don’t make sense. The long-form is reduced in size on the photocopy so it doesn’t take up the full page left-to-right. You can see cross-hatches that show where the left side of the BC is - on the top where the BC data is filled in, but not on the bottom half where the signature and certification are. It looks like a BC (with concrete edge on the left side) was placed on top of a sheet of paper that had the signature and certifying statement and the whole thing was copied. Except for the top half of the left edge there is no sign of security paper.
How did the 7655 do that?
Also, there is no sign of staple marks or a diagonal fold in the upper left-hand corner where the pages were flipped back. The COLB is perfectly sraight with the long-form. Was the packet for the press stapled together?
“The document in the factlack photos is not the same document that was scanned or created.”
___________________________________________
Actually the Factlack photos and the fullsize Daily KOS are the same document.
In fact, due to this, it is easy to show the fraud.
The 3d document in the photos existed first. It was scanned later. There are matching attributes to the full size, hi-res Daily KOS document. And....printed elements that would not be part of the real document were picked up in the scan and can be seen in the photos. Amazing. They did not clean up their document. Probably did not see a need to. Print is actually pretty low resolution but digital photos taken with a Canon 570IS from up close....they show a lot. A whole lot. And then they scanned it and only enhanced the error. That was nice of them.
Idiots.
Scribble found and 'absolutely' created.
Nobody knows what workflow was used. All we have are some assumptions based on what the image looks like.
Source: The first is that the original so-called “long form” birth certificate — described by Hawaiian officials as a “record of live birth” — absolutely exists, located in a bound volume in a file cabinet on the first floor of the state Department of Health. Fukimo said she has personally inspected it — twice.
This isn't necessarily true. Fukino's October 2008 news release only states that she checked to see if the document was on file. This doesn't mean she personally inspected the document. She may have done nothing more than pull up an entry on a database. That news release says nothing more about the original record or what information is contained in the record.
Source: “After the 2008 elections, the Department of Health received a significant number of requests for a copy of President Obama’s original birth registration by individuals who believe that the president is not a U.S. citizen,” Fukino explained. “To assure the safety of the record, the bound volume was removed from the file vault and placed into a fireproof safe with limited access.”
Anyone notice that Fukino calls it a "birth registration" and not a Certificate of Live Birth or Birth Certificate?? And as I noted in another comment, there should have been no reason to move this document or the "bound volume."
Second, has anyone ever scanned a page in a book or scanned documents in a "bound volume"?? It's very hard to do. A volume with 500 records would be very hard to place on a scanner bed and hold still, plus the scanner lid can't be closed tightly over the book. This means that light will seep into the scan, which creates very strong shadows and clarity problems. IOW, the image in the PDF is exceptionally clean for being scanned while still bound. The easier way to do this would be to remove the document from the bound volume and scan it flat. We end up with more inconsistencies than we do with answers. Nothing has been debunked.
No, actually they aren't. The Daily KOS scan came from Tommy Vietor. It's the same one that shows the edge of the paper in the scan. The document that factlack photographed has a wider margin of security paper surrounding the printed border the rectangular box. You can look at the full-sized scan and compare the margins to the document in the photographs. The factlack document has a wider margin all the way around.
Everything outside of the clipping mask becomes transparent, showing the white of the pdf page, which is exactly 8.5x11. The clipping mask does not change the size of the pdf page.
whUUT fake? And Fukino refused to verify if the DoH even issued Obama his COLB back in 2007 even though it was published on the net by Obama? target=
NBC: You presume that they unbound them…
Obviously someone fails to understand how documents are migrated to a digital library. Maybe they should become an expert on mass-storage systems like iXOS systems instead of Xerox machines.
Why does every single other example ever presented NOT show the same Nordyke-effect?
If it was done as explained then there should thousands and thousands of examples with the same effect. Yet only one ever presented exhibits this apparent mix of 1960s technology along side 1980s and beyond technology. Only one.
Amazing.
Why did the cross-hatches go away on most of the document? Why are there cross-hatches on the BC part but not the certification part? When you adjust the brightness and contrast you can actually see an abrupt line in the bottom as well as the side of the BC part, where it and its cross-hatches stop.
How did the 7655 do that? How did it stop the cross-hatches precisely at the left and bottom edge of the BC part, leaving the certification part as if it is floating on a piece of paper separate from the BC image? What workflow accounts for that?
Enlightening. It goes with Goober AberCrombie who came up with Obama bupkis. LoL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.