"V" is for Valerie.
Posted on 08/06/2013 9:46:22 AM PDT by Nachum
Valerie Jarrett, Commander in Chief
Confidential sources close to Conservative Report have confirmed that Valerie Jarrett was the key decision-maker for the administration, the night of the Benghazi terrorist attack on 9/11/2012.
The chronology of the evening of 9/11 are as follows:
At approximately 5 PM Washington time, reports came in through secure-channels that Special Mission Benghazi was under attack. Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey summoned the President,and briefed him on the crisis, face to face.
Subsequent to that brief meeting, President Obama proceeded to the White House to dine in his living quarters.
(Excerpt) Read more at directorblue.blogspot.com ...
"V" is for Valerie.
That source is from July 2012, BEFORE Benghazi.
The guy gets news an embassy is under attack then heads to the dining room for an executive meal presented by servants?
This man is un-American, an interloper, jackass, devoid of knowing the difference between right and wrong, self serving, arrogant, incompetent, lazy, negligent, prim a-donna, narcissistic......
Iirc he had invited guests to dine with him in the privacy of the non public area. Wonder if they BYO-D with enough to share
May 5, 2013: Issa Reveals Explosive Details From Benghazi Whistleblowers
Maybe the REAL thing they are trying to hide is that Obama did go to bed and it was really Valerie Jarrett calling the shots.That would make Obama actually look like a puppet who is allowed to take outrageous vacations and play golf all the time, while an unelected person is making all the decisions in Obama's name, without Obama's involvement or participation.
THAT would make people step back and ask why Obama is even there, if others are doing all the work.
This wouldn't be a case of an "executive" President (like Reagan was reported to be) who actively lays out strategic parameters and let's his subordinates work out the actual details. This would be a case of a completely disengaged President who is not participating in the daily rigors of the job.
Same thread, the debate continues...
So you say Obama ordered the stand-down, and I say that Obama was disengaged and Valerie Jarrett ordered the stand-down, even though she is not in the chain-of-command. The end result is the same, the order to stand down.If Obama left it to Jarrett and then walked away, it would be extreme deriliction of duty. Obama is the President, not Jarrett. Obama convinced 50 million people to vote for him just weeks after this happened, not Jarrett.
If Obama was found to have lied to the American people in order to win the election, and then cover it up after he won, and if the MSM and the people behave as they have in the past (Nixon covering up the break-in), then Obama SHOULD be forced from office. Americans don't like blatent stealing and cheating from their leaders.
And especially if it was the election that the People feel was won on false pretenses, not stolen votes.
The debate goes on...
Still more...
Still, my point is this: If Obama did not give any order - stand-down or go - because he wasn't there and it was Jarrett giving the order, would Panetta accept that as legal chain-of-command? Would the Generals?I think that's our disagreement. You are saying that Obama did give the order, because he must have due to the chain-of-commang standing down. I am saying that a differnt chain-of-command was accepted, with Jarrett, not an absent Obama, calling the shots.
And everyone accepted it as Constitutional and authorative
Got it. Default inaction.It concludes...I would have hoped to see people try harder to get Obama into the game. I can't beleve that a "Do Not Disturb" sign hanging from Obama's door was enough to stop the most powerful military in the world.
I'm sure that sent a very clear message to our enemies about how America will react to aggessions. Just do it after 9:00PM ET on a weeknight.
More like, Jarrett said don't wake him up because he has a big day tomorrow in Las Vegas.May 8, 2013: Live Thread: Benghazi Whistleblowers Hearing 11:30 A.M. EDT 5/08/13Still, taking that from Jarrett is a de facto order to stand-down, if that was what was the standing default order. It's the same thing: Panetta took unconstitutional orders from Jarrett, not Obama. He should have walked right past her and knocked on Obama's door himself.
I still wonder if Obama was absent and others (Jarrett?) gave "orders" that were followed in Obama's name?
-PJ
This was my understanding as well, before reading this article. However, consider this: Navy Seals Tyronne Woods reportedly was laser-painting targets. As a highly trained soldier, he was aware that painting targets gives away your position. He MUST have thought that air support, one capable of responding to painted targets (such as an AC-130) was nearby or on its way, as the article states.
Thus, I think it is possible that there was an AC-130 in Tripoli.
If it had been at Tripoli, no Cross Border Authority would have been needed.
Agreed. The real issue is who gave the order to stand down.
Of course. ValJar couldn’t withstand a confirmation hearing, remember? So now, she’s the de facto POshiiteUS.
Her name’s not Jarrett. We need to call her as she is: The Shirazi.
“Bull. No one but the President can.”
The man doesn’t. That’s how he gets his ‘I didn’t do it’ or ‘It wasn’t me’ down so convincingly;. He didn’t and it never was/is. So, he’s being accurate, and who’s to know?
“I think that’s our disagreement. You are saying that Obama did give the order, because he must have due to the chain-of-commang standing down. I am saying that a different chain-of-command was accepted, with Jarrett, not an absent Obama, calling the shots.
And everyone accepted it as Constitutional and authorative “
No. Ham and Gaouette did not. And were relieved. ALL top echelon military and covert executives have now left, IIRC.
Congress has seen the documentation. They are complicit.
There was relief waiting on tarmacs at Sig, too. It’s their job.
I’d wager there was relief amped up and ready on a moment’s notice all over the place. The overrunning of an embassy should be the DOS equivalent of Broken Arrow. but I don’t know the call sign.
-PJ
I see.its his is,is defense.
Andrew Breitbart TOLD us he had tape of 0bama and Ayres plotting the overthrow of the US, from back in the day. Remember? At C-PAC. He said to watch March 1st.
On the midnight prior, he was murdered.
bttt
“I see.its his is,is defense.”
Yes. He’s a liar but knows his tells. So, whether we have The Shirazi or a body double, the person can READ the words as though they are true. Talk right. Act Left. Lie to Christians. Kill them and Jews.
There are no words to describe the level of these people. They are mole hole putrifaction.
That was also the goal of the street gang community 0 organized and represented in the state legislature
Here’s what been collected so far if you want to read up on it!
Start at about 749-59. Good material at 730 too
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2151323/posts?page=749
Follow the links
Watch the deceivers w pierce brosnan.
The libs will be trashing the Conservative report & Rush which is to be expected.
But then it poses the question to the naysayer, if not Valerie, then who? Pls tell us.
IOW that’s how it’s gonna be until you prove that’s not what happened!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.