Posted on 06/26/2013 1:19:52 PM PDT by Abakumov
Choices:
No. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Period.
Yes. Its a freedom and equality issue. Washington shouldnt have the power to say what couples can and cannot get married.
Somewhat. The federal government shouldnt be involved at all. Leave it to the states to decide these things.
It doesnt matter. Marriage is a dead institution anyway.
(Excerpt) Read more at rare.us ...
So now we see one of the main reasons Obamacare was rammed (no pun intended) through.
FREE HIV DRUGS FOR ALL OBAMA'S HOME BOYS !!!
This was one of the main factors surrounding the fall of the Roman Empire. We have repeated history. funny how progressives always repeat history, like they have never learned.
Come Lord Jesus Come. Heed the prays of Your people who seek Your face and honor your commandments. We cry out to You to heal our land.
I could honestly care less. I don’t agree with the descision at all, but I’m not goingto whine about it from behind a keyboard. When society allows morality to be dictated to them by their corrupt elected officials, that society deserves nothing.
What reality are you from? Revere is revered. Arnold is not.
Historical reality.
He was charged with treason after the Penobscot Expedition (which failed), and the pay chest ‘mysteriously disappeared’ and his craven actions in delaying the seige for sufficient time to allow the British to reinforce their garrison.
Arnold on the other hand, nearly took Quebec himself, succeeded on the raid and was abandoned by the Colonials. He was a hell of a general and poorly regarded by the Colonial government. He took substantial personal financial risks to arm the colonials and was never repaid for his losses by the quartermasters. So the man was ruined.
Until he turned to the British, it was he, and not Revere that was considered to be the hero.
Revere never had any monuments until after that poem written in the Victorian era by one of his descendents who sought to elevate his family. It’s complete hokum.
Do you agree with the Supreme Courts decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act?
No. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Period.
73%
Yes. Its a freedom and equality issue. Washington shouldnt have the power to say what couples can and cannot get married.
18%
Somewhat. The federal government shouldnt be involved at all. Leave it to the states to decide these things.
7%
It doesnt matter. Marriage is a dead institution anyway.
3%
States have the right to determine marriage, but doesn’t the Federal government have the right to determine who gets Federal benefits?
Have you considered the possibility that they did learn history?
Looks a little fishy donut?
“Revere was a traitor, an English spy, caught then and later betrayed the Revolution.”
Utter nonsense.
If he was such a hero, why don’t we see commendations from his commanding officers?
“If he was such a hero, why dont we see commendations from his commanding officers?”
I will not venture to guess what you have or have not seen or why.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.