Alabama Democratic Party Submits Different Obama Birth Certificate In Ballot Challenge Appeal

McInnish-Goode-v-Chapman-Appeal-ADP-Amicus Brief ^

[Cold Case Posse Supporter]

In a unusual rare move, the Alabama Democratic Party has submitted a amicus brief in the McInnish Goode v Chapman Appeal case. The reason being is most likely because the Alabama Supreme Court has Chief Justice Roy Moore presiding over it. He supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin during his court martial. Another worry for them is another justice named Tom Parker. He once opined in a prior McInnish case:

"McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public."

This has reasons for the Alabama Democratic Party to be alarmed. In the amicus brief, the Alabama Democratic Party attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence submitted by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief” and stated:

"A county sheriff from Arizona is not an “official source” of anything in Alabama."

One thing that stands out in the amicus brief filed, specifically on page 33 is something new. It's a Barack Obama long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something not seen before. It's not the normal security paper backing that the Hawaii Dept. Of Health has been using. It is raising a lot of questions that even has Obama supporters baffled. Click on the link and scroll to page 33 of the brief to see the birth certificate.

[Seizethecarp]

“The Democratic Party of Alabama submitted a copy of the LFBC (no diamond pattern) and then there is the diamond pattern LFBC on Jack Ryan’s scribd.com account.”

Where did they get it? (Who forged this one?)

[4Zoltan]

Well, as I understand it (and I could be wrong), the one from the Alabama Democratic Party is a certified copy that Pixel Patriot or Obamareleaseyourrecords got from the Alabama Court. I’m not sure but I think the Jack Ryan copy was downloaded from the Court’s website (using Pacer?) and then they added the watermark (Friends of the Fogbow) and uploaded it to the Ryan scribd account.

The diamond pattern than might be a watermark. Was it added to screw with people?

[butterdezillion]

How do you know the AL Dem Party’s copy was different than what Jack Ryan posted on scribd?

[4Zoltan]

I assume they are the same thing. The Alabama Demo copy doesn’t have the diamond pattern background.

[butterdezillion]

Where did you see the AL Dem Party’s copy without the diamond pattern?

[4Zoltan]

“2. The PDF copy e-filed by the Alabama Democratic Party with the Alabama Supreme Court was obtained by Birther Report. The diamond pattern is not found on this e-filing. Pixel Patriot analysis reveals the security paper background extended on the right side farther than the visible area of the PDF copy (clipped/masked version) posted on the White House servers on April 27th, 2011.”

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/04/revealed-multiple-obama-birth-certificates.html

[butterdezillion]

Thanks. I hadn’t seen that.

Seems like the AL Dem Party assembled their image from the WH PDF but printed it without using the clipping mask.

I wonder if that’s why the White House changed it back to unflattened - so the AL Dem Party could take off the clipping mask and pretend to have the same document that Savannah Guthrie supposedly photographed. Sort of disingenuous because it then proves all the more that the image on the White House website is a printout of the masked PDF and not a simple scan of a document.

And it would suggest collusion between the AL Dem Party and the White House. The AL Dem Party must be ready to go to jail with Obama and the others.

Seems to me if Jack Ryan and/or the Friends of Fogbow are willing to add stuff to legal documents and pretend that it’s genuine by not noting that it’s an added watermark, they’ve lost credibility with the sane world and their posted documents will always be questionable as to whether they’ve first been manipulated before being posted on Scribd. A very silly thing to do since there’s no reason to want to “mess with” anybody, unless there’s something they want to distract from...

[Exmil_UK]

I think the Alabama Dem Party is using the amicus brief on behalf of Obama to try to reintroduce the Forged 2011 LFBC PDF using slight of hand, without actually presenting it, and using this “shadow of a forgery in the hands of a stand-in” instead.

That 2011 LFBC file is a total liablity, and they have to keep that multi-layered PDF out of court.

The next question is will the Alabama supreme court sit “En Banc” or will there be a more limited selection of judges?

If the court rules for Klayman against Beth Chapman, there is the question of how strict or lax will the Mandamus be?

Will a strict Mandamus, if granted, force Chapman to “perform her duty” in front of the Supreme Court of Alabama or refer her to a lower court to report back to.

If the Mandamus is general and asks Chapman to refer back to/ act in front of a lower court, the whole process of Dem's/CP-USA/GOP-e tricks, traps, forgery, dissembling, switcheroo’s and Judicial threats/blackmail/manipulation will recur.

These people have no shame whatever, no trick is too lame or cheap if it allows the political class to CYA.

[4Zoltan]

“they’ve lost credibility with the sane world’

Yeah, I don’t think they are too worried about losing credibility with the “sane” world.

“their posted documents will always be questionable as to whether they’ve first been manipulated before being posted on Scribd.”

They usually post court documents so it’s not like they have the only copy, so I don’t think there is real much fear that everyone is going to be fooled for long if they should change something.

“there’s something they want to distract from...”

I think it has to do more with point and laugh at...

[4Zoltan]

“That 2011 LFBC file is a total liablity, and they have to keep that multi-layered PDF out of court.”

The appellant (Larry Klayman) already introduced it into court.

[Exmil_UK]

Even more reason to keep it out of defense arguments, especially when you are trying to paint the other side as making extraordinary claims.

Imagine opening the 2011 LFBC PDF *from the defense* in court on a PC running Adobe Illustrator.
“Oh look here is the Hawaii DOH Registrar's stamp floating about in a separate layer... “

Now THAT would be a steak through the heart of the Connecticut Vampire's reputation.

Gasp, even the dullard's in the MSM might have to report it.

[butterdezillion]

Changing legal documents and posting them online so people will waste time having to try to find a credible/honest source is just a waste of everybody’s time.

Which tells you the grand purpose of those people’s lives: to waste everybody’s time.

Life is too short for that kind of crap. I pity people who have nothing better to do than lie.

[Exmil_UK]

butter, on ppsimmons there is a report that the Arpaio CCP will be assisting on the case in the Alabama supreme court:

http://www.ppsimmons.blogspot.com/2013/05/breaking-cold-case-posse-will-assist-in.html

I think partly why Fogblower activity is raised is because the usual tricks have so far failed to ensnare the Alabama supreme court justices. Perhaps we won't see any judges acting as ventriloquist dummies for Perkins Coie this time.

On the the other hand I think we have some VIP’s from the republican side who may be moving *against* the political class consensus that has protected the usurper all this time by getting involved with briefings by Zullo/CCP.