[Exmil_UK]

I think the Alabama Dem Party is using the amicus brief on behalf of Obama to try to reintroduce the Forged 2011 LFBC PDF using slight of hand, without actually presenting it, and using this “shadow of a forgery in the hands of a stand-in” instead.

That 2011 LFBC file is a total liablity, and they have to keep that multi-layered PDF out of court.

The next question is will the Alabama supreme court sit “En Banc” or will there be a more limited selection of judges?

If the court rules for Klayman against Beth Chapman, there is the question of how strict or lax will the Mandamus be?

Will a strict Mandamus, if granted, force Chapman to “perform her duty” in front of the Supreme Court of Alabama or refer her to a lower court to report back to.

If the Mandamus is general and asks Chapman to refer back to/ act in front of a lower court, the whole process of Dem's/CP-USA/GOP-e tricks, traps, forgery, dissembling, switcheroo’s and Judicial threats/blackmail/manipulation will recur.

These people have no shame whatever, no trick is too lame or cheap if it allows the political class to CYA.

[4Zoltan]

“That 2011 LFBC file is a total liablity, and they have to keep that multi-layered PDF out of court.”

The appellant (Larry Klayman) already introduced it into court.