Posted on 04/16/2013 9:21:37 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Court will hear oral argument regarding both California Defendants and Federal Defendants Motions to Dismiss on April 22, 2013 at 10:00 am in Courtroom 7. The Court will allot each party--Plaintiffs, California Defendants, and Federal Defendants--a maximum of 30 minutes of oral argument. Oral argument will be limited to: (1) mootness, (2) standing, (3) political question doctrine, (4) the Speech and Debate Clause, and/or (5) service of process on defendants. No witnesses and/or exhibits will be permitted or considered at the hearing. Plaintiffs Motion to Recuse Counsel for Defendants and Motion to Expedite under Local Rule 144 (ECF No. 102) currently set for April 18, 2013 is VACATED in light of the hearing on the motions to dismiss. A new hearing date will be set for said motion if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Anyone who didn’t see this coming needs to pay closer attention to the state of the judicial system.. It’s come to the point where conservatives don’t have a chance. If you’re a conservative & you want to contest a traffic ticket, you may prevail. If you’re a conservative trying to hold a liberal person of color in high office to acct, you’ve lost before you even stepped into the courthouse.
"When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion -- when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing -- when you see money flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors -- when you see that men get richer by graft and pull than by work, and your laws dont protect you against them, but protect them against you -- when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice -- you may know that your society is doomed."
Ayn Rand?
I’d like to know where that quote comes from too. It is powerful, & so accurate it is both scary & heartbreaking.
by:
Ayn Rand
(1905-1982) Author
Source:
Atlas Shrugged, p. 413
Thanks. It’s been a while since I read it. Wow. Rand really nailed it.
Like each of the judge’s children, for example... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Its amazing how judges just knuckle under to Obama PC policies. They have become rubber stamps. I have no doubt it is achieved through extortion and/or blackmail. The fascists of Europe did the same to the European judiciary in the 1920s and 1930s. Obama is no different, he is just another fascist dressed up in a different suit of clothes..
Thanks for acquainting me w that quote. I have it cut & pasted for future use & reference.
You’re very welcome, FW, as always. Hope this finds you well; blessings on you and yours. :)
Thank you! May your blessing return to you & yours fourfold.
I’m doing extremely well—& what’s more I’m feeling v optimistic. You know, F_J, for a v long time we’ve been frustrated by Obama’s seeming imperviousness to the normal laws of politics, popularity, etc. I.e.: the economy is on the skids & there’s bad news on every front, yet still his popularity sinks only minimally if at all.
I can’t prove it but I have the sense that things are on the verge of changing. Well, by ‘on the verge’, I should clarify: sometime in the coming yr. Still, after waiting for four+ yrs, that’s not as far off as it could be. He’s defied political & spiritual laws of gravity for almost as long as it’s possible to do. It just feels like something’s going to (finally!) shake loose over the next 12 mo’s or so. We shall see.
Meanwhile, thanks again for your great post. It was a real day brightener.
Rule 1006. Summaries to Prove Content
The proponent may use a summary, chart, or calculation to prove the content of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs that cannot be conveniently examined in court. The proponent must make the originals or duplicates available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at a reasonable time and place. And the court may order the proponent to produce them in court. (emphasis added)
Onaka has told us as clearly as possible that the WH COLB PDF is an abstract.
On the issue of the most egregious crime in the history of this nation, usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by a criminal using forged and stolen I.D.s , the U.S. Department of Justice defrauded the U.S. Congress, this court and American people and went behind the back of the U.S. Congress in order to cover up Obamas forged and stolen IDs. U.S. Department of Justice became criminally complicit in the Racketeering Scheme to cover up Obamas forged IDs.
A judge will look at this.... but only for the exquisite legal pleasure of throwing it out with maximum prejudice. Sorry.
“A judge will look at this.... but only for the exquisite legal pleasure of throwing it out with maximum prejudice. Sorry.”
Dr. Taitz acts as though every judge is a one-man grand jury empanelled to decide whether or not to hand down a criminal indictment of Barry.
Even criminal usurpers have rights to due process in what is left of our legal system.
Criminal acts that become apparent in any case in any trial coming to the attention of any Judge must be referred for prosecution or the Judge himself is complicit in the crime.
That IS a judges duty.
There have been 207 original jurisdiction civil suits concerning presidential eligibility since 2008. There have also been 90 state and federal appeals court rulings and 25 United States Supreme Court rulings. That’s a total of 322 civil actions. No judge has referred any allegation of a criminal act to any law enforcement agency and no judge has been sanctioned for failure to refer.
If any person has evidence of a criminal act having been committed, that person should present their evidence or their suspicion to a duly authorized law enforcement agency for further investigation.
The long form is a copy. The short form is an abstract. Neither version is a summary.
Any judge or panel of judges who wish to see the original can issue a court order for it under Hawaii Revised Statutes 338-18(b) (9). Since 2008, no judge has felt the need to issue such an order.
Gee, Corzine and MF Global comes to mind...
The long form has never been certified as a true and correct copy.
HI DOH has issued certifications that HI DOH records were used to verify that supplied info matches HI DOH info.
As has been repeatedly shown, “matching” does not connote “complete”.
Certifying that official records were used is in no way certifying a true and correct copy.
(pssst...He’s deaf)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.