He then facetiously noted that the Republican elite will "add 11 million Democratic voters to the rolls through amnesty for illegal aliens as part of a brilliant plan to stop being a national party. And so long as Republicans come to Washington promising they'll change it only to be co-opted by the town's permanent political class, such panels will be necessary."
“The Uninvited”...reminds me of one of my favorite songs.
Time for us to take over. We need to stop being so polite.
I have been trying this lately.....they already think I am “right wing”, so it really doesn’t matter.
Instead of just stating facts and listening to their excuses, I now demand they show me proof, facts, as to what they are claiming.
Of course they can’t and do the “oh, I don’t want to fight now”. I tell them we are not fighting, we are discussing. I backed up my claims with facts and am only asking you to do the same.
Conversation usually ends there, lol.
The homosexuals wanting to hijack CPAC is another issue...
National Review has now become faggot central.
Why don’t these people just start their own convention and call it FudgePAC???
Breitbart lives.
More on immigration reform & cpac...note how the media marks anyone trying to control illegal aliens as ‘opposing immigration’.
Anyone who can’t see that the powers at CPAC are more aligned with Obama/MSM than their conservative base, isn’t trying to see it.
The fix is IN.
CPAC discusses GOP immigration policy
“Regardless of policy outcomes, Republicans must change their rhetoric about immigration, said Whit Ayres, a GOP pollster who has worked for Sen. Marco Rubio.
“The idea that we can use harsh tones against the undocumented without affecting the way Americans see us is just delusional,” he said.
The immigration discussion drew a few heckles from the crowd and some harsh response on Twitter. Mark Krikorian, the head of the Center for Immigration Studies, which opposes immigration, said the panel is “flacking for the Democrats’ amnesty plan.’’
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/03/15/cpac-discusses-gop-immigration-policy/1989577/
The crowd at cpac is NOT impressed with this phony ‘immigration panel’
Speakers on an immigration-reform panel on Thursday morning pitched immigration as an issue that’s compatible with conservative principles, but they received a relatively quiet reception from the audience of activists gathered in the conference hall.
“We are losing the battle against secular socialism at the moment we need more allies” said GOP pollster Whit Ayres. He also added that it would be a “good idea” for Republicans to aggressively pursue hard-working and religious Hispanic voters in order to rebuild a winning coalition.
But even that notion encountered some resistance. One heckler shouted “legally!” in response to Ayres’ pitch. Later, an audience member shouted out “politically correct!” when Korn said that Republicans should use language that’s less “harsh” when speaking about the issue of immigration.
“So now the conservative base that stopped amnesty is demonized at #cpac2013,” tweeted Mark Krikorian, executive director of the immigration restrictionist group Center for Immigration Studies.
http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/cpac-conservatives-wrestle-immigration-divide/story?id=18729918
Andrew Breitbart ...”understood that people need vigorous and sustained discussion and debate to make their own informed decisions.
________________________________________
You cannot properly make up your mind about something if you dont know all there is to know on the subjct...
If people really knew and understood that the illegal aliens dont trump immigration but lawlessness against America, would they be so quick to jump on the wagon claiming a need for “comprehensive immigeation reform” whatever that means and that we are “anti-immigration” ???
If they truly knew and understood that the being in the womb is a living (breathing, yes) human baby with a beating heart, would they be so quick to kill her ???
If they truly knew and understood that God is not mocked, would they continue to spit in His face with their demand for secular humanism ???
If they truly knew and understood that Conservatism is not represented in the CPAC panels this year, would they repent and change their agenda next year ???
Wheres the HA HA fellow ???
Crony Capitalism should be a big winning issue for the Right. Especially if it is described as “Corporate Welfare.”
Why are we paying people simply for existing?
Why are we paying never-married women to have babies?
Why are we taxing intact families to subsidize bastardy?
Click the keyword Aliens to see more illegal alien, border security, and other related articles.
Interesting discussion of where we stand vis-a-vis the GOP establishment. As if we weren't already aware of that! Thanks for the ping, AuntB.