Finishing the Puzzle

Butterdezillion's Blog ^ | 3-15-13 | butterdezillion

[butterdezillion]

This is the first in a series of posts that will use key puzzle pieces to finish the puzzle of Obama's documentation problems. The first piece of the puzzle is Virginia Sunahara's death certificate, which shows us not only that high officials in the HDOH have ordered vital records to be fabricated, but reveals that the subordinates stuck doing the dirty-work are resisting by raising red flags in the forgeries they create.

I don't know how to get the formatting and images to transfer from a PDF so for now you'll have to look at my blog, but if somebody knows how to get all the content here in readable form, I'll be eternally grateful if they post it here.

I've heard that Mike Zullo will be at CPAC and can possibly get a hearing from some people who could do something with this issue. So maybe it can make a difference if we shout out some of the evidence we've got.

[bluecat6]

From Hawaii's 2012 Hawai'i Digital Archives Plan: Section 92F‐11 states that “All government records are open to public inspection unless access is restricted or closed by law.” This provision “applies prospectively, requiring disclosure of records maintained by state agencies regardless of when the records came into existence.” Each agency is required to issue instruction and guidelines necessary to ensure the public’s access to government records in §92F‐18, including compiling a public report “describing the records it routinely uses or maintains” [§92F‐18(2b)]. Providing the public access to records is covered in section 26‐6 which requires DAGS to “provide a long‐term means for public access to public information” [26‐6 (10(1))] and to “adopt rules as may be necessary or desirable for…the operation and implementation of a program to provide a means for public access to the State's…public information.” [§26‐6 (10(4D))]. The excuse of 'it might damage...' is not law. They LEGALLY have to share the record.

[ShadowAce]

Would it work for me to C&P the images into Paint and save them individually as jpegs and post the jpegs on my blog, so they could be used in HTML here?

Yes, that would work. Any place that is accessible from the net would work. Once that's done, we can edit the document to point to the links and the pics should just pop up.

[BubbaBasher]

You jump to conclusions without any proof and then state them as if they are facts. It detracts from the facts. Even those are a little sketchy.

[Bigg Red]

mfl

[butterdezillion]

What conclusions have I reached that are not supported by the evidence? Be specific; that’s what discussion boards are for.

[butterdezillion]

Thanks. I’ll work on that tonight after I get back from work.

[bgill]

Unless they make a super duper special law against vexatious requesters like they did specially for butter.

[onyx]

Thanks very much!

[bgill]

I know this is my soap box but you really should specify that the birth index you’re using is the digital one and not the original handwritten one. I haven’t read past the first paragraph under #1 so you may have distinguished it later on (then my apologies). The reason for this distinction is that the original handwritten one would be closer to the truth whereas a digital one is more easy to tamper with. The original index will also GLARINGLY show changes in entries - a kid gets adopted after birth and they literally scribble out/white out/tape over his birth name entry and adds him at the end of the end of the new last name section for that year - HELLO! GLARING SPOTLIGHT! Or there’s a big scribble through a dad’s name then you can bet there’s a new daddy listed at the end (out of order) of some other alphabet section - RED FLAG! Mama’s last name changes or there’s notes in the margin, same thing - YO, LOOKIE HERE, BREAD CRUMBS!!! That’s probably why they don’t want you anywhere near the original index.

[butterdezillion]

They claimed to have destroyed the original handwritten index. Said it was only used to find where the paper BC was at so they threw it all away when they computerized. Even though it is specifically specified as to be retained forever, just like the BC’s themselves.

Then again, they also claimed that they didn’t have a computerized index to Certificates of Hawaiian Birth (even though the “for office use” portion of their request form has that index as one of the indices to be checked) - and they did eventually come up with it after The Post & Email pressed them hard (IIRC).

The thing that comes through with every new detail is that the HDOH is crooked, crooked, crooked.

[bgill]

Yeah, I know. Lies, lies, and more lies. No records are ever destroyed, and even if there were a loop hole in the law, registrars are too anal to destroy anything. Registrars truly believe the records belong to them personally so they guard them with every ounce of their beings. All those shelves and boxes ever so neatly labeled give them power. They are the Keepers of Hawaii. The original books are somewhere but no way anyone in our lifetimes will ever see them. Three generations from now, someone will sneak through the gates but they’ll likely find three volumes missing - Aug. 1961, March 1965 and Dec. 1971.

Further proof they weren’t destroyed is they claim they were destroyed when they went digital is that with that statement they’re admitting nothing was destroyed when records were photographed and put onto microfilm or microfiche back in the 80s through a grant. No, all, I don’t have proof but it’s not like Hawaii wouldn’t have latched onto that grant money and modernize. That grant was created because the books took up too much space, the older books in “older” states were getting damaged (not the problem in the “newer” state of Hawaii but still) and because the pages could easily be taken out of the books put together with brads like the indexes were. I can see the microfilm being destroyed because those are considered to be copies rather than the originals but one would think they’d give the boxes to the state library. This grant was what allowed so many libraries to have microfilm and microfiche records across the nation.

[thecodont]

Thanks for the ping!

Butterdezillion:

Thank you for all your hard work.
Continuing to remember you in my prayers.

[bitt]

ping!

[butterdezillion]

I’ve got the images in a post at http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2013/03/16/jpegs-for-fr/ but I think I should have cropped some of these in Paint before saving them (if I could figure out how to do that).

I’m getting a little dejected though, truthfully. I think I’m just bone-weary. It’s such an uphill climb. We need a leader to “unite the clans” (as William Wallace in “Braveheart” would have said). Without a leader and a potentially-effective strategy, we’re all dressed up (with evidence) but with no place to go. Maybe Zullo can reach these new strong voices and they have not yet been hardened and poisoned by the DC filth. Maybe they even won’t care if the R leadership threatens to keep them from committee appointments. That kind of new blood and “never say die” attitude is what we need, to give us hope that there will ever be integrity in the system again.

I’ll be fine in the morning. I think I’m just really tired right now, and not sure that the troops we need are still in this game at this point. If Zullo is finding at CPAC a new energized “leg” in this relay, it may be coming just at the nick of time, when the worn runners are falling from exhaustion - but hopefully not before handing off the baton to the hand of a runner with fresh legs, speed, and the will to win. If these strong, fresh voices have been silent because they truly could not hear us over the deafening drumbeat of the threatened media, the real battle could just be beginning. I’m asking the Lord for strength to keep running until I can hand off what I know to those who can take it and truly run with it. I hope and pray that there are willing leaders to do this.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Marine_Uncle]

Thanks for the ping bitt.

[ntnychik]

Thanks for the pings!

[little jeremiah]

Placemark.

[Col Freeper]

Here is, I believe, all your data and images. I had to adjust the formatting slightly for FR's forum. If you have any questions/comments, contact me via FR email. Hope this helps.

================================

Back to the Beginning: Red Flags in Hawaii

This blog began in January of 2010 with “Red Flags in Hawaii”, giving evidence that the HDOH was engaging in deception and law-breaking to cover Obama’s ineligibility. Now we’ve got strong evidence that the leadership at the HDOH is forcing employees to falsify official records and the workers are fighting back by putting red flags into the forgeries. This series of posts will use that critical puzzle piece to put the whole puzzle together. At the end of this series I intend to make public a redacted version of an affidavit I filed with the Lincoln Police Department, verifying the evidence to substantiate my claims.

1. We already know that a high-level authority at the HDOH conspired to illegally falsify the 1960-64 birth index.

Part of that evidence is the proof that the HDOH falsified the 1960-64 birth index by adding names from non-valid BC’s. Norman and Nathan Asing were adopted by their stepdad, Albert Roloos, and now use the legal names of Norman and Nathan Roloos. I have a copy of the early-70’s divorce records stating that Norman Asing, Sr consented to allow his sons to be adopted and his ex-wife’s signature using her married name of Roloos, recent HI court records listing Norman Roloos and Nathan Roloos, and a PI database spreadsheet listing Norman’s birthday as Aug 4, 1961 – the same day as Mr. & Mrs. Norman Roloos were listed in the newspapers as having a son. I also have a certified driver’s abstract for Norman Roloos which I got by providing a SS# that was in his bankruptcy document and the Aug 4, 1961 birth date. So it is clear that Norman and Nathan Asing were adopted. Yet the non-valid, sealed original birth records under the Asing name are listed in the 1960-64 birth index. I also have evidence that a girl who was adopted has her adoptive name in that index but not her original birth name – confirming that birth names are sealed. Norman and Nathan’s non-valid birth names were manually added to the index.

The index is thus NOT a simple printout of the names from all VALID BC’s; any name in that index could have been manually inserted and we have no way of knowing which names are from valid BC’s and which are non-valid. This is particularly significant because when a colleague pressed to see Obama’s birth certificate (that former HDOH Director Chiyome Fukino had said verified that Obama was born in Hawaii) – as REQUIRED to be disclosed following Fukino’s public announcement – Deputy AG Jill Nagamine said that Fukino’s statement had not been based on the birth certificate but on the already-public birth INDEX. Which I’ve now proven was falsified by somebody at the HDOH office who has the power to add non-valid names to the printout. At least 2 of the names were added in violation of a judge’s order that information from those original birth certificates be sealed. So not only was this a deliberate falsification, it was a violation of a judge’s order. IOW, we already have proof that someone at a high level in Fukino’s HDOH conspired to falsify the 1960-64 birth index, in violation of a judge’s order. This is not a conspiracy THEORY; this is a documented, illegal conspiracy by a high authority at the HDOH. According to the AG’s office that illegal fabrication was the basis for FUKINO’s public statements.

2. Now we also have evidence that a high authority at the FUDDY HDOH forced a subordinate to forge the Virginia Sunahara death certificate – and that subordinate resisted by deliberately adding red flags.

Duncan Sunahara requested a copy of his deceased sister’s death certificate and received from the HDOH a certified copy – a partial scan of which is below (from http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/update-on-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html ).

The birth number that is hand-written could not have been assigned to Virginia in 1961 if either of the 2 BC-numbering methods described by HDOH officials were used. Besides that anomaly, that line has THREE other anomalies:

2a. The fonts for “T.H. FILE” and “NO.” were different sizes and misaligned. On a supposedly pre-printed form.

2b. T.H. stands for “Territory of Hawaii”. (See Appendix A) This is a STATE of Hawaii death certificate, as stated on the very top line of print, but it has a Territory of Hawaii file number. Again, supposedly on a pre-printed death certificate form.

2c. 151 is a BIRTH code, not a code for a particular state or a death code. (See Appendix B) Yet again, supposedly pre-printed.

IOW, EVERYTHING ON THAT LINE IS ANOMALOUS, and to get the “pre-printed” anomalies somebody had to C&P text from different sources rather than simply changing Virginia’s information and leaving the standard form how it is.

SOMEBODY at the HDOH who created this forgery wanted the world to know that the line which has Virginia’s supposed hand-written BC# is a total fabrication, and went to a lot of extra trouble to make it clear that it is a forgery. Why would they want the world to know this was a forgery, unless they were being forced to do it under duress and wanted to put up a red flag so the fabrication would be recognized?

Once we know this critical situation – that somebody at the HDOH is being forced to falsify records and is protesting by putting in red flags – other instances become more clear.

3. Two birth certificates similarly have BC#’s that could not have been issued in 1961 and have deliberate red flags inserted by someone at the HDOH.

3a. Johanna Ah Nee’s long-form BC from the HDOH has overlapping BC# digits (impossible with a Bates stamp) and what appears to be a forged Onaka signature.

World Net Daily published an image of a redacted birth certificate for Johanna Ah Nee, which she offered to them. There was a clear, convincing seal on it, suggesting it was from the HDOH. But on the backside there was bleed through and by adjusting the brightness and contrast a person could see the BC# (which is far out of sequence for either of the 2 contradictory BC numbering systems described by HDOH officials; more on that in later articles or see http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/the-hdoh-has-juggled-bcs-for-at-least-4-1961-bcs/). I noted at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/wnd-bc-forgery.pdf that two of the digits overlapped, which made it clear that the BC# had been manipulated by the HDOH, since the Bates stamp rotates manually and could not create overlapping digits. Again, a blatant red flag showing what information was falsified in that HDOH-created forgery.

I have looked at a LOT of Onaka signatures from various years, though my computer crash swallowed the document which showed the signatures I’ve compared. That signature on the Ah Nee BC was not made by Alvin Onaka; it has too many careful curves; isn’t simple and quick enough to be like any other Onaka signature. It seems to be a crude attempt at matching Onaka’s signature from the Peter-Boy COLB of the same era (1991-1995) that Ah Nee’s BC copy was supposedly issued.

Here is the back of the Ah Nee BC (from http://www.wnd.com/2011/09/342937/ ):

Here is the signature from the Peter-boy COLB (found at < href="http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/4746/peterboycertificate.jpg">http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/4746/peterboycertificate.jpg ):

Let me put those signatures side by side:

1991 Peter-boy signature:

Ah Nee (supposed) 1995 signature:

April 2011 signature (from COLB whose raised seal I felt):

3b. The 2 authenticating marks from the registrar (aside from the raised seal) are the certifying statement and the signature; Obama’s long-form had the TXE typo (from the HDOH) to deface the certifying statement and a smiley face to deface the signature.

I received from a colleague a certified copy of a short-form BC that had an official-looking raised seal:

But the certifying statement had TXE in it:

The HDOH has a certifying stamp that does NOT have TXE in it: it was shown on an image of a certified long-form received by a friend of Miki Booth, which was issued on March 15, 2011 – a little over a month before Obama’s long-form forgery was disclosed (image below taken from http://wtpotus.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/miki-booths-long-form-bc-hawaii.jpg ).

So they had a stamp that would not have had the typo TXE, but somebody at HDOH used the one that had the typo anyway.

SUMMARY: In addition to proof that somebody in a high position at the HDOH illegally altered the 1960-64 birth index, we have proof that Virginia Sunahara's death certificate was altered by someone at the HDOH - and that someone deliberately made the forgery obvious. It appears that the same thing happened on Ah Nee's and Obama's long-form BC's. All these fabrications by the HDOH involve BCs that don't work with either numbering method the HDOH has described, and the red flags center around the area of the BC that thas the BC# (in addition to the area with the authenticating marks from Onaka): The entire line with Sunahara's handwritten BC# is blatantly anomalous. Ah Nee's BC# has overlapping digits. The last digit of Obama's BC# is in a different layer and has different features than the other idgits. It is very possible that the HDOH worker deliberately put in overlap on Obama's last digit like he/she would later do with Ah Nee's fabricated long-form. So whatever worker was forced to do these fabrications put in red flags pointing directly to the BC#s. There is NO DOUBT that the HDOH leadership is forcing resistant workers to fabricat vital records, and BC#s are central to the fabrications.

Upcoming articles will put together more pieces of the puzzle, leading to a clear picture of what the HDOH has done over the past 4 years. But the fact of HDOH leadership forcing subordinates to create forgeries is central to understanding all the other evidence. Please note that high officials in both the Fukino and Fuddy HDOH's have been caught red-handed in illegal fabrications. At this point the only time period in which we HAVEN'T documented illegal activity is the time when interim HDOH Director Neal Palafox was in charge of the HDOH. This will be an important piece of the puzzle as well.

APPENDIX A– T.H. stands for Territory of Hawaii (Copied from http://library.ucsc.edu/sites/default/files/Abbreviations.pdf ).

Copied from http://www.hawaiiancollectibles.com/bottles/bottles.html:

Clips copied from http="//www.rdatoolkit.org/sites/all/files/constituencyreviewfiles/Phase1AppB_10_27_08.pdf.

[butterdezillion]

A thousand thank-you’s!!! I nominate you for knighthood, having saved the damsel in distress! =)

That saved me a TON of work. I am very, very grateful.