Lost Freepers: What ever happened to FReepers such as... NativeNewYorker

[JoeProBono]

Lost Freepers: What ever happened to FReepers such as...

NativeNewYorker

[Hot Tabasco]

The mods must like you if they banned you and didn’t ban you at the same time...

In their hearts they love me but you should hear what they whisper in my ear about you..........

[ansel12]

There were no bans for being anti-Gingrich, here is just a sample of your own postings as you were spamming FR with anti-Gingrich links.

---

To: GQuagmire
Former Gingrich Wife Says He Asked for ‘Open Marriage’

Exclusive: Gingrich Lacks Moral Character to Be President, Ex-Wife Says

Bombshell Report: Gingrich News Will Be Accusation of ‘Open Marriage’

ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife (She could “end his career”)

Newt Gingrich: The Indispensable Republican [same “bombshell” details in 2010 Esquire hitpiece]

NEWT EX-WIFE UNLOADS ON CAMERA; NETWORK DEBATES ‘ETHICS’ OF AIRING BEFORE SC PRIMARY

Newt Braces for Ex-Wife Interview (Nothing new revealed in interview)

Gingrich camp heads off ex-wife interview

‘Very Bitter’ (Team Newt responds to ex-wife Marianne’s Interview Remarks)

Newt Gingrich asked for ‘open marriage,’ former wife says

It’s gonna be one of those days. Hoo Wee.

17 posted on 01/19/2012 11:13:03 AM PST by Responsibility2nd

---

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Former Gingrich Wife Says He Asked for ‘Open Marriage’

Exclusive: Gingrich Lacks Moral Character to Be President, Ex-Wife Says

Bombshell Report: Gingrich News Will Be Accusation of ‘Open Marriage’

ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife (She could “end his career”)

It’s gonna be one of those days. Hoo Wee.
18 posted on 01/19/2012 7:59:35 AM PST by Responsibility2nd

---

To: maggief
Former Gingrich Wife Says He Asked for ‘Open Marriage’

Exclusive: Gingrich Lacks Moral Character to Be President, Ex-Wife Says

Bombshell Report: Gingrich News Will Be Accusation of ‘Open Marriage’

ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife (She could “end his career”)

It’s gonna be one of those days. Hoo Wee.
14 posted on 1/19/2012 8:00:18 AM by Responsibility2nd

---

To: SeekAndFind
Former Gingrich Wife Says He Asked for ‘Open Marriage’

Exclusive: Gingrich Lacks Moral Character to Be President, Ex-Wife Says

Bombshell Report: Gingrich News Will Be Accusation of ‘Open Marriage’

ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife (She could “end his career”)

Newt Gingrich: The Indispensable Republican [same “bombshell” details in 2010 Esquire hitpiece]

NEWT EX-WIFE UNLOADS ON CAMERA; NETWORK DEBATES ‘ETHICS’ OF AIRING BEFORE SC PRIMARY

Newt Braces for Ex-Wife Interview (Nothing new revealed in interview)

Gingrich camp heads off ex-wife interview

‘Very Bitter’ (Team Newt responds to ex-wife Marianne’s Interview Remarks)

It’s gonna be one of those days. Hoo Wee.

(And I’m not even keeping track of the Perry threads)

44 posted on 1/19/2012 9:42:35 AM by Responsibility2nd

[ansel12]

Good gosh, you really are a bald faced liar, even to posting fake links.

[Responsibility2nd]

Cool. Thanks for posting that. What’s the link to that comment?

And.... If you please - look at Jim Rob’s reply to me.

[Responsibility2nd]

Do not call Free Republic fake. Very troll-ish.

[DJ MacWoW]

Click The Pic To Donate

I don ‘t know about you, but I am impatient with those Republicans who after the last election rushed into print saying, “We must broaden the base of our party”–when what they meant was to fuzz up and blur even more the differences between ourselves and our opponents.

It was a feeling that there was not a sufficient difference now between the parties that kept a majority of the voters away from the polls. When have we ever advocated a closed-door policy? Who has ever been barred from participating?

Our people look for a cause to believe in. Is it a third party we need, or is it a new and revitalized second party, raising a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors which make it unmistakably clear where we stand on all of the issues troubling the people?

Let us show that we stand for fiscal integrity and sound money and above all for an end to deficit spending, with ultimate retirement of the national debt.- CPAC 1975

[rlmorel]

LOL...that was before I watched The Walking Dead, so I wasn’t into the whole zombie thing...:)

[ansel12]

Yet another lie, you keep posting links as though they are evidence of your insulting lie of a purge of Gingrich critics, yet there are not anti-Gingrich zots at your links.

It is clear that you have merely been trolling with this whole scam of a lie.

Jim Robinson was not zotting people for criticizing Newt Gingrich, you made that up.

[Responsibility2nd]

Jim Robinson was not zotting people for criticizing Newt Gingrich, you made that up.

Liar. Look - right here you are yourself gloating over a Join or Die zot.

[Responsibility2nd]

Opps. Here you are again on another Join or Die zot thread.

This makes 2 of the hundreds of such threads. I just didn't know you were on all of those threads. You know.... the threads you keep saying don't exist.

[berdie]

later

[Windflier]

It's hard to sharpen your debate skills in an echo chamber. I've been spending less time on FR, and more time on other forums where I can argue with libs.

Your statement presupposes that most of us are still inclined to argue with liberals. Perhaps some still are, but I believe that for most conservatives, the phase of arguing over basic political philosophy with left-liberals has long since passed.

I'm not interested in burning calories or BTUs trying to get some empty headed leftist drone to understand the simple facts of life. 99.9% of the time, it's a total waste of precious energy. No, I'd rather prepare for the next phase of American history, which won't be a war of words.

[Responsibility2nd]

Join or Die Zot thread # 3 that you were on.

A triple zot. And what did you just say?

Jim Robinson was not zotting people for criticizing Newt Gingrich, you made that up.

Boy, do you look stupid.

Gee, this is fun. I could do this all night.

[DJ MacWoW]

The Most Electable?!

Click The Pic To Donate

As Of January, 2012, He Faced Voters 22 Times And Lost 17 Of Those Times

Support FR, The Truth Serum

[ansel12]

The great zot thread of 2008 was wild. God only know has many FReepers got the zot in just that one thread for comments supporting Giuliani.
But the “Newt or else” era was worse. Much worse. For several weeks in early 2012 one didn’t dare post a negative comment regarding Newt over hundreds of threads or the would be zotted.

That makes zero threads so far, who are these posters and where are the purges of freepers who supported Santorum for instance who were zotted for merely saying something negative about Gingrich, why weren't you zotted?

You just can't support your claim of people being purged for saying something negative about Gingrich.

Trolls and and anti-conservatives get zotted, but as you prove, merely being against Gingrich meant nothing to Jim Robinson, regardless of what you are accusing him of.

[JoeProBono]

http://cache.kotaku.com/assets/images/9/2012/01/medium_aea1c17d5f0e0f0ef0f68f47a99af93e.jpg

[Responsibility2nd]

You asked for proof. I gave you proof. Yet you try and diffuse that proof claiming “Trolls and and anti-conservatives” got zotted. I have it on record that there were some 60 FReepers who were zotted during that “Join or Die” era. (Conservative Estimate - No telling how many more just left.)

Yet they were all “Trolls and and anti-conservatives:, huh?

For the last time STHU about Santorum. Nobody’s talking about him.

Why didn’t I get zotted? I answered that. Pay attention. Like I told you earlier; I and everyone else just shut our mouths about Newt and let things pass.

Now. This is your chance - one again - to stick your fingers in your ears, chant LA LA LA LA LA LA LA LA... and deny this happened (even though you were on those threads) and post something else irrelevant and have the last word.

I’m bored with showing you how dumb you are. Moving on.

[ansel12]

You can’t keep up what you haven’t started, we know that you Romney people have always harbored hostility towards freerepublic, but you haven’t shown anything other than the usual trolls getting zotted, not being zotted because they didn’t support Gingrich, or merely had something to criticize him about.

Where is your evidence of this “”one didn’t dare post a negative comment regarding Newt over hundreds of threads or the would be zotted.””

[ansel12]

I have it on record that there were some 60 FReepers who were zotted during that “Join or Die” era.

You sure are taking your time producing that list.

Santorum versus Gingrich was a major battle here, how many Santorum supporters were zotted for saying something negative about Gingrich?

Trolls, anti-conservatives, trollish Romneybots, and trollish Paulbots will always get zotted, but not because they didn't support Gingrich.

Your pushing Romney and being a hardcore anti-Gingrich guy didn't hurt you for instance.

[Absolutely Nobama]

Debate is fine. We’re all individuals, and for the most part, we don’t do groupthink. During the primary, I backed Newt Gingrich. Some backed Santorum. Some backed Cain. We went to war with each other and that was fine. We had spirited debates and all was well after the primary was over.

However, we don’t want to be beating back troll after troll, either. It becomes tedious. There are certain things that are simply universal truths and they cannot be denied.

They are, in no particular order:

1. The US Constitution is to be interpreted as written.
2. Our rights come from God, not the government.
3. Homosexual “marriage” is evil and should be fought every step of the way. Homosexuals do not need and are not entitled to special rights not granted to other Americans.
4. Abortion, under any circumstances, is murder.
5. The United States must do as it sees fit on the world stage, regardless of whether or not the UN, EU, or the rest of the Alphabet Soup New World Order likes it or not.
6. Israel is a close ally and should be treated as such.
7. Affirmative action is just as wrong as any other type of racism.
8. The redistribution of wealth is wrong and there is justification for it whatsoever.
9. Illegal aliens are criminals who should be punished, not welcomed with open arms.
10. RINOs, liberaltarians, and paleocons are not our allies.

Anyone who rejects these universal truths are not people to be reasoned with. They are Marxists, either culturally or economically. As such, they are contemptible little slugs who should be shown the door as quickly as possible.