Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Runs The World? Solid Proof That A Core Group Of Wealthy Elitists Is Pulling The Strings
http://www.worldviewweekend.com/ ^ | January 31, 2013 | Michael Synder

Posted on 01/31/2013 9:35:54 AM PST by B4Ranch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last
To: Revolting cat!
Better hope The Pentaverate doesn't hear about this...if you ever want to eat chicken again.
101 posted on 01/31/2013 2:24:43 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: svcw

I hope you did read #78 too.


102 posted on 01/31/2013 3:01:15 PM PST by B4Ranch (When democracy turns to tyranny, we still get to vote. We just won't use voting booths to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Oh yes it is. Tell me one organized religion that is not socialist in nature. Everyone of them tells you their religion is the only true religion and without them you will not be saved. Exactly the same spiel that a socialist government spouts out. They demand that you support them financially so they can grow and earn more money.

I know, I know. That is a cold hard look at the organized religions of the world and it certainly will offend some but that’s how I tend to look at things. I strip away all the pretty fluff and examine the bare bones. Organized religions are continually making an effort to control their believers into behaving the way they see fit.

Some say Saturday is a Holy Day and the others say No, you are wrong! Sunday is the day when we must worship. But you have to admit the ones who have got it down pat sure have built up vast fortunes and strong power holds.

Me, I’m free to worship Jesus everyday and in any way that I believe is proper because I don’t have to answer to a priest or rabbi about my sins or regressions. I have had people tell me that I must join their way of worshiping or else. I just laugh at them.


103 posted on 01/31/2013 3:19:41 PM PST by B4Ranch (When democracy turns to tyranny, we still get to vote. We just won't use voting booths to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
stuffed ballots, more votes cast than there are registered voters, 100 % of voters in a number of precincts cast votes for obozo

We did not lose because of vote fraud. If only if were that easy. Do the Democrats cheat where they can? Sure. Was it anywhere near enough to account for our beating? Not even close. Romney lost by 5 million votes, in the end it wasn't really as close as it seemed election night. Heck, we only held the House due to clever gerrymandering - the reality is over a million more people even voted for a Democrat House candidate than a Republican. We are simply following in Europe's footsteps down the road of secular socialism. And the result of that is predictable - stagnant growth, high unemployment, ever greater debt, etc. Add in the rapidly growing Hispanic demographic that overwhelmingly votes Democrat (especially if we amnesty in 11 million more) and you can see how difficult this is going to be to reverse.

Don't hang your hat on vote fraud. We have the same problem the Europeans have - a people problem. Take a good look at Greece. Their problem isn't vote fraud, monied "globalists", Jews, "banksters" or any other nefarious conspirators. They have a population that wants to maintain a massive social welfare state they can't afford. Even when it's obvious they can't afford it they don't want to cut anything. Even when they are begging for cash, the people still don't want to cut anything. That is coming to the US soon. California is flat broke and in a steep decline, yet voting overwhelmingly Democrat and it isn't because of vote fraud. I wish that's all it was, but the problem is far worse.

104 posted on 01/31/2013 3:33:57 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
The massive debt is how you control people.

No, at least in the West, the massive debt is because people vote for politicians that promise them expensive social welfare states that we can't really afford. Socialism is a drug and people will easily fall for politicians that promise it to them.

The free trade agreements are opening the world to a whole new third world population of potential consumers who will yearn to have everything that is on TV, just like Americans do.

Good, why shouldn't they? I lived in a 3rd world country and I am glad to see standard of living increasing. Never believe a liberal when he/she tells you that farmer living in a decrepit hut still using a water buffalo to plow the fields doesn't want a nice house and a tractor. 3rd world people want the same nice things we have. More power to them.

They’ll send their kids to public indoctrination classes - public schools to get an education so they too can earn cold hard cash in a job that promises it will enable them to live a better life.

So? What are you babbling about?

We are getting new taxes that will control us from reaching too far into the hole. The leaders know how to control the masses.

What?

I'm guessing you're regular over at InfoWars and PrisonPlanet? Supported Ron Paul?

105 posted on 01/31/2013 3:49:28 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

LOL. you gave away the secret of post #12. I already had a few falling for it.. darn...


106 posted on 01/31/2013 4:17:02 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: discostu

IMHO, read the bios of advisors to Presidents starting with Wilson, read up on the Council of Foreign relations.

Read up on George Peabody (1795-1869) who gave J S Morgan his start in London banking and its gold cartel, setting up for J P Morgan (son of JSM) to be European banking’s main representative in America.

The capital funding for American expansion, the slave trade, etc., all this was the invested in by European banking.

The fortunes don’t evaporate when people die, and the business associations and relationships don’t evaporate either. Peabody setup a lot of foundations, all with a purpose, that would help the businesses in the long run, many were education-focused. This gives the foundations great sway over the direction of education, i.e., how the “common man” is to be taught and how the elites are to be taught. You’ll notice that elites even to this day send their children to the Ivy League schools.

You will almost never hear this history mentioned in the media or in schools.

If you research, things become obvious. George Soros is using the exact same formula; endowing universities, tax-free organizations, etc. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, that’s how we can know that he’s not just doing his thing on his own, and what he’s doing is no accident. He must, therefore, have the Eastern-Europe and Middle Eastern “franchises”, the way the Rockefeller and Morgan line has the American “franchise”.

The Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve is all people on the same team, the Fed itself was founded by the same team. If you could create a central bank for a country - you’ve got an off-the-charts amount of power and influence in that country, beyond that of any particular politician.

The only way this is not all real is if these bankers founded the Fed, all these foundations, universities and the Council on Foreign Relations, then sort of just let their influence die out and kind of “let them go”.


107 posted on 01/31/2013 4:26:20 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Obozocare, the national debt, the creeping erosion of our freedom, cost of living skyrocketing, the unemployment rate, the adminstrations selective enforcement of our laws, obozo’s constant lies, illegal invasion of Lybia, his first term was failure after failure for this country and our law. Given the turnout of the crowds prior to the election where Romney and Ryan had thousands showing up at every ralley and obozo and Biden turnouts had mere hundreds showing up at theirs, what did that say with respect to who the people no longer trusted and who they intended to choose on election day. With that and as long as electronic programmable vote and vote counting machines are the predominant means of casting and tallying votes and the allowed stuffing of absentee ballots, it will be hard to convince me and whole lot of other people that the 2012 election was not stolen. Obviously the people didn't like Romney because he is establishment but the mood was that the people have had enough of the obozo and his Marxist policies. Obozo owes many thanks to Mr. Soros, Mr. Hagel and the Dibold Corp. Not to be contentious but maybe it might do for you to reconsider where your hat hangs.
108 posted on 01/31/2013 4:33:17 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

It’s narrarated in English.


109 posted on 01/31/2013 4:39:39 PM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Great vid by ShorelineMike! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOZjJk6nbD4&feature=plcp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
Given the turnout of the crowds prior to the election where Romney and Ryan had thousands showing up

That does not measure depth of support, only intensity of supporters. You know who else had massive rallies right up to election day? George McGovern. That didn't work out so well for him did it. Nader could fill arena's during his presidential runs, but that didn't amount to squat. Heck Ron Paul could get huge crowds near college campuses, but again, that just shows what followers he has are intense about him.

With that and as long as electronic programmable vote and vote counting machines are the predominant means of casting and tallying votes and the allowed stuffing of absentee ballots, it will be hard to convince me and whole lot of other people that the 2012 election was not stolen.

The same thing the Democrats said when they lost the off year elections in 2002 and the presidential election in 2004. Kerry had huge crowds, and the intensity of an opposition and media that hated Bush with a passion - he still lost. The left blamed Diebold and other nefarious plots with voting machines. They didn't really let go of their "black box voting" conspiracies till they started winning again in 2006.

We are simply following along the same path Europe is. They are voting secular socialist, and we are doing the same. I understand it is hard to accept that the American public is so far gone, but think about how dramatically the demographics have changed. Look at California. California is in the gutter yet just voted for a Democratic legislative super majority. It ain't vote fraud man, its a public that is growing increasingly ethnic, ignorant and dependent. Sorry, but that's the reality. We're just not the same country we once were.

110 posted on 01/31/2013 4:50:03 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
I read the Daily Bell. It drops a newsletter in my mailbox.

Interesting issues about the elite.

http://www.thedailybell.com/

Read about the Internet Renaissance.

111 posted on 01/31/2013 5:39:33 PM PST by Chickensoup (200 million unarmed people killed in the 20th century by Leftist Totalitarian Fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

So who are those 300 families?


112 posted on 01/31/2013 5:49:08 PM PST by Chickensoup (200 million unarmed people killed in the 20th century by Leftist Totalitarian Fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

People these days got no appreciation of the classics.


113 posted on 01/31/2013 8:27:24 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

Then are you saying that some family in the Church is part of this shadowy cabal dedicated to the promulgation of international socialism? That organized religion is just another tool in the Illuminati’s kit?


114 posted on 02/01/2013 5:30:50 AM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Problem here is that you’re declaring the normal behavior of powerful captains of industry as a conspiracy. Rich people do rich people things, people that want to become leaders to leader things, that’s not a conspiracy, that’s normal life. Yes the rich people send their kids to ivy league school, and so do others, thanks to online stuff Harvard is projecting to have 10 million students soon. Yes they invest in similar things. Yes they belong to the same clubs. That’s just normal reality. That doesn’t mean they control things, that doesn’t mean they’re pulling the strings, that doesn’t mean there’s some massive conspiracy. It means people hang out with their own kind.


115 posted on 02/01/2013 7:22:57 AM PST by discostu (I recommend a fifth of Jack and a bottle of Prozac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I hear you, rich hang with rich, sounds plausible.

I can’t explain J P Morgan founding the Council on Foreign Relations, though. That does not square as normal behavior for rich people.


116 posted on 02/01/2013 11:02:08 AM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

Why wouldn’t a many involved in international business want to be in a group of high powered businessmen and politicians from multiple countries? The more information he has the more business opportunities he can capitalize on. The more people he knows in foreign countries the more business allies he has. It’s rich hanging with rich.


117 posted on 02/01/2013 11:40:04 AM PST by discostu (I recommend a fifth of Jack and a bottle of Prozac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Why wouldn’t a many involved in international business want to be in a group of high powered businessmen and politicians from multiple countries?

The Council on Foreign Relations is not a "group of high powered businessmen", etc.; if you take a look at their membership lists, you'll see who's a member and who's on the Board. For example, it has historically included the leadership of the U.S. news media. How are they helping to gather information for the rich ? The news media leadership controls the dissemination of information, they're not at CFR to find stories. It's quite obvious, because, although these news media heads are members and directors of CFR, the CFR is kept as low-key as possible in the news media and one virtually never hears about. One never hears about its founders, its purpose and mission, its membership, etc., whether in education, news or entertainment. It is impossible to have a leadership position in the State Department or be a foreign policy advisor to a President without the approval of the CFR.

The more information he has the more business opportunities he can capitalize on.

Being the personal advisors to U.S. Presidents, filling the State Department leadership - that's not about gathering business information. I don't think Madeleine Albright, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, etc., simply gather information for rich people (I'm sure they would chuckle at the thought).

The more people he knows in foreign countries the more business allies he has. It’s rich hanging with rich.

The rich man already has business connections anywhere he wants. Government connections are had for one reason. Just like a local town, where land developers want to have their men on the planning boards, zoning boards, etc. It's not so they know what's going to happen, it's to make happen what they want to happen. If I'm a big developer and want to develop some land that's off limits to development, that's where I want to control the government, not come begging it for permission.

Bottom line - the CFR functions as a shadow foreign policy agency that controls U.S. foreign policy. If this was not the case, it would not be necessary for it to exist; diplomats could simply work for the State Department without belonging to a foreign policy "think tank". Or, they could found their own think tank that ONLY had diplomats, instead of including banking, industry, news media, etc., leaders in with them. As I look back in history it seems painfully obvious that CFR's influence as an organization is unprecedented.

Long-term permanent control versus individual influence:

If those who control the CFR chose to rely on individual people to influence the State Department for them instead of having created the CFR, they'd have to keep working on the careers of the individuals one at a time so as older ones retired new ones could get established. And there would be much more traceable links from the influencers back to their "masters". Having the CFR means that the CFR brand name automatically confers acceptence upon new individuals. Those that control the CFR are completely out of the public eye, hidden behind the CFR, while all the members of CFR, old and new, can easily be installed in State Department leadership positions and White House advisory capacities without needing to develop the personal connections to arise to those positions. The CFR is "foreign policy outsourced", a situation that is inherently and invariably dangerous for a nation.
118 posted on 02/01/2013 12:59:31 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

No, I’m say the organized religions are a hotbed of socialist for change.


119 posted on 02/01/2013 1:19:56 PM PST by B4Ranch (When democracy turns to tyranny, we still get to vote. We just won't use voting booths to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Thanks, I signed up too.


120 posted on 02/01/2013 1:26:39 PM PST by B4Ranch (When democracy turns to tyranny, we still get to vote. We just won't use voting booths to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson