Posted on 01/27/2013 7:25:19 AM PST by Seizethecarp
Sheriff Joe Arpaio's lead Obama investigator Mike Zullo appeared on Carl Gallups' radio show Freedom Friday. Zullo repeated that the Obama investigation never stopped and that the only thing that stopped is the media coverage around the investigation....
Zullo says; "We are so convinced... let me go out on limb... I am going to put my reputation out there that we have evidence beyond a reasonable doubt--the higher standard--beyond a reasonable doubt that this document is an utter forgery."
Zullo also says; "the evidence we have acquired, new found evidence that we have never made public at any point in time, and we are not going to make public until we have the right opportunity, will convince even the greatest skeptic that this document is 100% a forgery."
Zullo hasn’t gotten a dime from this, and has spent plenty on it. His motivation is justice and truth.
Not everyone is as selfless as you.
Zullo and Jerome Corsi came out with an e-book at the same time as Arpaio and Zullo held their first press conference. Zullo and Corsi continue to split the profits from sales of that book.
All of Zullo’s portion goes to his church. This wasn’t about making money; it was about getting the book on Amazon, in an attempt to not just “preach to the choir”.
If their goal was to spread the information as widely as possible, why charge for the book?
They couldn’t get it on Amazon without charging for it.
What they really wanted was for the media to simply report this stuff, but they wouldn’t. Probably had something to do with the fact that Andrew Breitbart dropped dead less than 5 hours after telling Arpaio his evidence was good, and Rush Limbaugh got what was treated as a bomb threat because it referred to 2 famous assassinations - all on the same day as Arpaio’s first presser...
But $9.99?
I still say they’re running a scam. You can be the first to say “I told you so!” if this investigation leads to anything more than press releases, but I’m not going to hold my breath waiting.
"There were legitimate questions raised about Obama’s background when he started running for the presidency, but ultimately I decided that he was born in Hawaii and all the brouhaha over his birth was just a distraction to the real issues facing the nation.
On what basis did you "decide" that, ConstantSkeptic?
"As far as Zullo, he’s a con man. Pure and simple."
So you're saying his boss, Sheriff Joe Arpaio is also a con man, correct? Did you even watch the Cold Case Posse pressers on their findings?
Perhaps you're not an Obot/distruptor and are merely being simultaneously credulous and willfully obtuse regarding the veracity of the "Obama" nativity story. Whatevs. Shaking the dust off my sandals now. . .
> Me too! This whole political thing is just BS and wait, and wait, and wait, nothing but wait.
Donald Trump’s big surprises never amounted to anything much if at all...
The fact that the State of Hawaii has repeatedly stated that Obama was born there is sufficient for me. The full faith and credit clause of the U.S. Constitution states that that is sufficient proof. I would have to believe in an unbelievable amount of fraud and cover-up to believe that Hawaii is lying. I know that lots of folks believe that there’s a grand conspiracy here. I don’t. There are a lot of conservatives who share my belief that Obama was born in Hawaii. It’s not strictly a liberal belief!
As far as Arpaio, I think he has his own agenda. If he truly had evidence, then why hasn’t it gone anywhere?
It is becoming obvious that ignoring the “get it right the first time” has not produced a valid plan / strategy / organization / fact collection that will generate a successful solution to the problem. Reasons and excuses for failure will not cut it. Success will be achieved only if correctly addressed up front with full analysis of the potential strategies / actions of the opposing side.
It is becoming obvious that ignoring the “get it right the first time” has not produced a valid plan / strategy / organization / fact collection that will generate a successful solution to the problem. Reasons and excuses for failure will not cut it. Success will be achieved only if correctly addressed up front with full analysis of the potential strategies / actions of the opposing side.
The full faith and credit clause states that there must be a way of verifying documents and so far, Hawaii has NOT legally verified any alleged birth certificate for Obama NOR have they ever LEGALLY verified he was born in Hawaii. Under Federal Rules of Evidence (one way of satisfying the full faith and credit clause), if someone claims to a fact through a certified document (such as a birth record) then those who challenge it in court have a right to inspect that record. Consider the refusal by Hawaii and Obama to submit an official copy of that record in ANY court of law to be quite telling of what the record does not and cannot prove.
But $9.99?
I still say they’re running a scam.
*****************************************
It’s marketing , if they sold it for $0.01 people would think it was worth $0.01 .... As to the “scam” remark ,, who would run a scam where all of the money goes to a charity and they KNOW the target of the investigation will at the very least verify that’s where the funds went. Arpaio is a true American hero, read his history...
The fact that the State of Hawaii has repeatedly stated that Obama was born there is sufficient for me. The full faith and credit clause of the U.S. Constitution states that that is sufficient proof. I would have to believe in an unbelievable amount of fraud and cover-up to believe that Hawaii is lying.
******************************************************
Substitute “global warming” for the subject matter and “scientists/universities/gov’t” for Hawaii see if what you said makes any sense.. it’s not like this is anything new.
Au contraire. The Hawaii state registrar has actually indirectly confirmed in a legal document that Obama’s HI BC is legally non-valid and has confirmed in 2 legal documents that the White House image is a forgery.
Which is probably why somebody at the HDOH has deliberately added names from non-valid BC’s onto their 1960-64 birth index - as I’ve proven on my blog by showing that Norman and Nathan Asing are the birth names of adoptees and thus those names are on non-valid records.
In addition, we’ve got 4 1961 BC#’s that the HDOH has put on copies they’ve issued.... that could not have been on those particular BC’s in 1961. IOW, the HDOH has switched around at least 4 Aug 1961 BC#’s, including Obama, Stig Waidelich, Virginia Sunahara, and Johanna Ah Nee. The 2 long-forms have blatant signs of forgery on them - apparently from a resistant HDOH worker or possibly Onaka himself (Obama’s BC has TXE in the certifying statement and a smiley face in Onaka’s signature, and Ah Nee’s BC has 2 BC# digits overlapping and a signature that doesn’t look like Onaka’s handwriting). Sunahara’s BC# was found on a death certificate that had 3 blatant signs of forgery on the same line as the BC# was handwritten on: T. H. for Territory of Hawaii on a death certificate from the State of Hawaii, and mismatched and misaligned fonts for FILE and NO. right next to T. H. ) Virginia Sunahara was born on Aug 4, 1961 and died one day later, and the HDOH is refusing to let her brother see her original birth certificate, claiming that the records are “too fragile” to survive if anybody was allowed to see them. Never mind that the paper records have been microfilmed and scanned so that the paper records don’t have to come into play at all.
The only lawful reason for any one of those people to have a BC# different than the one they were given in 1961 is if law enforcement requested a new BC to be fabricated in order to protect the registrant from imminent harm, in which case a BC is made up which says whatever law enforcement says it should say, and a different BC# is given to the fictitious BC so that the real BC remains in effect and available to somebody who knows what is claimed on it. IOW, Eric Holder or Janet Napolitano probably told the HDOH worker what they had to put on a fabricated BC for Obama. It has no resemblance to what is on the real record for Obama, if there even is one.
Seriously? The stupid and uninformed don’t really care who’s legal or what’s forged as long as they keep getting their free stuff. I love Arpaio - but - this will go nowhere just like the rest of the information about the birth certificate.
“Orly jumped the gun before there was solid verification, no doubt alerting the data scrubbers, so it will be a miracle if there is anything left to uncover.”
How reliable is the data if it can be scrubbed?
SSA has data sharing agreements with state vital statistic records databases, DHS and DoS. Not to mention the fact that SSA records are not scrubbed or deleted. They can be updated and corrected, but there is a data trail.
Obama’s SS-5 application is helpful, but his NUMIDENT File is chronological history of his life.
If Obama is ever required to produce his birth certificate in court, I believe that he will produce one from Hawaii stating that he was born there.
The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the Constitution requires the court to treat that birth certificate with the same respect that the court has to birth certificates of its own state. The birth certificate will be self-authenticating and prima facie evidence. Anyone challenging that birth certificate will have to come up with their own evidence that the facts on the birth certificate are somehow false. A newspaper from Kenya, for example, will not trump the official record of a state. Assertions and speculation won’t do. You need something to PROVE that the state records are false. That’s a mighty tall challenge. What proof do you think a court will accept over its official state records?
The signs of forgery/fraud were obvious THE DAY it was released.
Examples. Videos released THE DAY the LFBC came out...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eOfYwYyS_c
Layers, clipping mask, identical letters, etc, etc.
Hack fake.
So?
When major media can publish a forged document and defend it as “fake, but true” they are not going have a problem with a forced Birth Certificate from the “First Black President.”
Another one from the day after it was released.
I like the way this one ends. Its like the end of a high dive. He nails it with his final comment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7k8T7tjTEg
So within hours of release most image oriented computer people knew what was released was a fraud.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.