"There were legitimate questions raised about Obama’s background when he started running for the presidency, but ultimately I decided that he was born in Hawaii and all the brouhaha over his birth was just a distraction to the real issues facing the nation.
On what basis did you "decide" that, ConstantSkeptic?
"As far as Zullo, he’s a con man. Pure and simple."
So you're saying his boss, Sheriff Joe Arpaio is also a con man, correct? Did you even watch the Cold Case Posse pressers on their findings?
Perhaps you're not an Obot/distruptor and are merely being simultaneously credulous and willfully obtuse regarding the veracity of the "Obama" nativity story. Whatevs. Shaking the dust off my sandals now. . .
The fact that the State of Hawaii has repeatedly stated that Obama was born there is sufficient for me. The full faith and credit clause of the U.S. Constitution states that that is sufficient proof. I would have to believe in an unbelievable amount of fraud and cover-up to believe that Hawaii is lying. I know that lots of folks believe that there’s a grand conspiracy here. I don’t. There are a lot of conservatives who share my belief that Obama was born in Hawaii. It’s not strictly a liberal belief!
As far as Arpaio, I think he has his own agenda. If he truly had evidence, then why hasn’t it gone anywhere?